Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Tuesday, March 9, 2010

"Oh my GOD you guys....that computer-enhanced baby is totally ME!!!!"

Posted by on Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 8:01 AM

Apparently that's the thought that went through the mind of Lindsay Lohan upon seeing this E-Trade commercial:

As the New York Post reports:

Lindsay Lohan is suing the financial company E-Trade, insisting that a boyfriend-stealing, "milkaholic" baby in its latest commercial—who happens to be named Lindsay—was modeled after her. And she wants $100 million for her pain and suffering, The Post has learned.

The actress filed a lawsuit yesterday in Nassau County Supreme Court over the commercial that debuted during the Super Bowl this year....Lohan's lawyer, Stephanie Ovadia, said the actress has the same single-name recognition as Oprah or Madonna. "Many celebrities are known by one name only, and E-Trade is using that knowledge to profit," Ovadia said. "They used the name Lindsay," Ovadia said. "They're using her name as a parody of her life. Why didn't they use the name Susan? This is a subliminal message. Everybody's talking about it and saying it's Lindsay Lohan." Ovadia wants an injunction to force the spot off the air, and the Lindsay camp wants every last copy of the commercial.

I understand cocaine is a drug that makes people think they're glamorous and fascinating, but what drug makes people think they're being impersonated by CGI babies?

Also, if this is a collaborative publicity stunt by Lohan and E-Trade, I salute them both. If it's not, God help Lindsay Lohan, who's apparently going to go crazier than we ever dreamed.

 

Comments (29) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
Cracker Jack 1
Every person in the world named Lindsay is to report to your local governmental renaming facility. Those with preexisting addictions to alcohol, cocaine and hanging your genitalia out in the breeze have first priority.

There shall be only one.

Lindy -- you're on probation. A little too close for the Mistresses' liking...
Posted by Cracker Jack on March 9, 2010 at 8:10 AM
gloomy gus 2
I love this so! Thank you for posting it. If Lindsay can just get the purple lady from the Oscars to be her mouthpiece on this. Pleaseplease.
Posted by gloomy gus on March 9, 2010 at 8:14 AM
LogopolisMike 3
I understand cocaine is a drug that makes people think they're glamorous and fascinating, but what drug makes people think they're being impersonated by CGI babies?

The same drug -- just too much of it apparently.

Actually...and it pains me to admit this... I actually thought the same thing too the one time I saw this commercial. Not that it was $100 million worth of pain and suffering, but I didn't think it was an accidentally name choice and much more cleverly political and liberal than I expected from a stock trading ad. And so timely -- I mean he's being such a baby about the whole military tribunal thing.

Oh wait, not Lindsay Graham?

Never mind.

I totally thought of Lindsay Lohan as the milkaholic baby. And I'm not just saying that because I want to be a witness for the plaintiff if this thing goes to trial. I was put on this Earth to be Kato Kaelin to Lindsay's O.J.
Posted by LogopolisMike http://logopolis.typepad.com on March 9, 2010 at 8:21 AM
Cato the Younger Younger 4
I want $100 Million from E-Trade from allowing fucking infants to make stock trades. Seriously, and we wonder why the economy got fucked?!?!?
Posted by Cato the Younger Younger on March 9, 2010 at 8:21 AM
5
Funny, her lawyer doesn't seem to have the same problem with the last 5 years of the show The Soup on E!
Posted by pragmatic on March 9, 2010 at 8:28 AM
6
Lohan's case would be a lot stronger if it was the baby girl tramping out with Baby Lindsay. Do you think Sam Ronson will sue too?
Posted by Smartypants on March 9, 2010 at 8:51 AM
Joe Szilagyi 7
Can we please outlaw these horrible commercials? They make me not want to have children.
Posted by Joe Szilagyi http://www.joeszilagyi.com on March 9, 2010 at 8:54 AM
linda with a y 8
SHE NEEDS THE MONEY!

Plain and simple. Being a three time rehabbed media whore just doesn't pay like it used to.
Posted by linda with a y on March 9, 2010 at 9:14 AM
Urgutha Forka 9
^Who's Linsay Lohan?^
Posted by Urgutha Forka on March 9, 2010 at 9:15 AM
Hernandez 10
And once she figures out that she can't make a living off of frivilous lawsuits, she will begin her long-anticipated career in porn.
Posted by Hernandez http://hernandezlist.blogspot.com on March 9, 2010 at 9:21 AM
Normal Adjacent 11
I can just picture the strung out call to her lawyer. She's screaming and crying about "Milka-What?" and he's calculating the billable hours this BS will net him.
Posted by Normal Adjacent on March 9, 2010 at 9:27 AM
STJA 12
Adrenochrome.
Posted by STJA on March 9, 2010 at 9:38 AM
TheMisanthrope 13
Lindsay Buckingham unavailable for comment.
Posted by TheMisanthrope on March 9, 2010 at 9:43 AM
Free Lunch 14
The same single-name recogition as Oprah or Madonna. Yes, she's high.
Posted by Free Lunch on March 9, 2010 at 9:46 AM
Bill W. 15
It's pretty obvious to everyone (except some dense people on here) that E-Trade is specifically referring to Lohan but aren't you allowed to make fun of celebrities?
Wouldn’t SNL be bankrupt by now if you could sue?
Because it is a commercial vs. a comedy skit?
I’m confused.
Posted by Bill W. http://www.seattlegayscene.com on March 9, 2010 at 10:16 AM
16
Everyone knows crazy bitches are the best lays.
Posted by six shooter on March 9, 2010 at 10:19 AM
17
@4 FTW!

Am I the only one who finds these talking baby commercials fucking annoying?
Posted by Senor Guy on March 9, 2010 at 10:28 AM
Fifty-Two-Eighty 18
You've got it, Bill W. Making fun of celebrities is fair game; doing it for profit is a very different story.

Six Shooter: That seems to be the story of my life, yeah.
Posted by Fifty-Two-Eighty http://www.nra.org on March 9, 2010 at 10:29 AM
reverend dr dj riz 19
@15.. then i 'm one dense bitch.. i can barely recognize her face , let alone her name.. and while the thought rarely occurs to me once every other millenia, why i would associate my decision to hire a company that specializes in stock trading with a broke coke addled and thinly talented actress is a little beyond me..
what #13 said.. lindsay buckingham makes about as much sense..
.. but as you can tell, maybe it's just because i fucked around and got old..or something
Posted by reverend dr dj riz on March 9, 2010 at 10:39 AM
schmacky 20
@15: "Obvious"? Really? I would say that I am a "fan" of Lindsay Lohan in my straight-guy way (meaning I think she's hot), and I'm pretty sure if it was "obvious" I would have caught the reference.

Help me understand. What does the "milkaholic" reference have to do with her? I mean, sure she drinks, but isn't that kind of a reach? Also, if the one female baby is Lindsay Lohan, who is the other female baby on the phone (I assume she's also famous)? Why does the Lohan baby, if it's supposed to be Lohan, not have red hair, or sound like her, or have anything at all in common with her besides a first name?

And do you really buy this "Oprah, Madonna, Lindsay" bullshit?
Posted by schmacky on March 9, 2010 at 10:54 AM
David Schmader 21
19, 20: I'm with you.
Posted by David Schmader on March 9, 2010 at 10:56 AM
22
I found this commercial to be one of the most gallingly misogynist of the float of galling, misogynist ads during the Superbowl, in addition to having hated the creepy obnoxiousness of this campaign to start with.

So in the interest of these things being sued off the air, I will totally back up Lohan's claim on this one. I mean, everybody knows how obsessed the audience of the Superbowl is with troubled young actresses, so that totally makes sense.
Posted by lilzilla on March 9, 2010 at 11:06 AM
23
Everyone knows who Lindsay Lohan is. Don't act like you don't, stupid "I don't own a tv" losers. You are commenting on a blog about a Super Bowl ad.
Posted by lovechild of Ron Popeil on March 9, 2010 at 11:14 AM
reverend dr dj riz 24
@23.. nope ..don't know her..and i watch tv.. like reglar tv too bceause i cain't afford cable. i do know what the super bowl is and i watched the ad..but lindsay lohan.. heard the name , don't know the face or why i'm supposed to make the connection.. but our household is like that..
the other night when the oscars were on and sandra bullock was making her speech, mys husband walks into the room and says' who's that ?' ..i say' sandra bullock' he says'' oh.. i hate her.... what does she do again?'
Posted by reverend dr dj riz on March 9, 2010 at 11:39 AM
hartiepie 25
@23...I don't know who Lindsay Lohan is ---so fuck y'alls.... I AM SUMBODY!

(And yes I know about Google, but how famous can somebody be if I have to go look her up on Google?)
Posted by hartiepie on March 9, 2010 at 11:46 AM
David Schmader 26
I totally know who Lindsay Lohan is, but her connection to the eTrade baby is beyond specious.
Posted by David Schmader on March 9, 2010 at 12:18 PM
very bad homo 27
I know who Lindsay Lohan was.
Posted by very bad homo on March 9, 2010 at 2:48 PM
Fnarf 28
@5 makes an interesting point. Everytime Lindsey does something Soup-worthy, which is almost every week, she's introduced with a gravelly smoker's voice intoning "It's Lindsey", in obvious homage to their much perkier "It's MILEY!" intro for that other one-named megasuperduperstar.
Posted by Fnarf http://www.facebook.com/fnarf on March 9, 2010 at 4:09 PM
i'm pro-science and i vote 29
I hate these commercials, so I hope they get sued
Posted by i'm pro-science and i vote http://home.comcast.net/~theyellowdog/joerepublican.htm on March 9, 2010 at 9:27 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy