Slog
News & ArtsFriday, March 5, 2010
Politics What Would Pridemore Do on Health Reform?
Posted by Eli Sanders on Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 2:03 PM
Yesterday I asked, and today Democratic State Sen. Craig Pridemore, who's running to replace Brian Baird in Washington's 3rd Congressional District, answers:
The Republicans are making automated 'robo-calls' to local voters about health care reform, suggesting that I'm undecided. Let me be clear: I believe that Democrats in Congress should pass the bill, include a public option, and if necessary, use the reconciliation process to get it done.
That's a strong contrast with what the likely Republican nominee, Jamie Herrera, says. It's also an interesting contrast to what Baird himself is saying—which is that he's "undecided" on how he'll vote on health care reform.
Still no word on what the other leading Democratic candidate, Denny Heck, thinks.
3
1 & 2-- This is actually a discussion on the candidates for Washington's 3rd district. Do your health-care trolling elsewhere.
This is hardly surprising. Pridemore is coming out as a progressive. Heck is waffling b/c he's trying to find the right profit angle. He's a businessman, not a politician. All his "big Olympia" supporters are socially liberal, when convenient, and fiscally tied to large kick-backs & campaign contributions. Another BlueDog in the making.
This is hardly surprising. Pridemore is coming out as a progressive. Heck is waffling b/c he's trying to find the right profit angle. He's a businessman, not a politician. All his "big Olympia" supporters are socially liberal, when convenient, and fiscally tied to large kick-backs & campaign contributions. Another BlueDog in the making.
4
wait hold on.
he didn't say HE would vote for it.
he said that "Democrats" should.
Unless he said HE will vote for it, he just psyched you.
he didn't say HE would vote for it.
he said that "Democrats" should.
Unless he said HE will vote for it, he just psyched you.
5
Zepol, a public option can't hurt. And it's quite possible that reconciliation will present an opportunity for a better kind of public option. Single-payer isn't going to happen (but it becomes a more likely next step if we pass the current bill), but you might be able to get a Medicare buy-in provision.
Actually, as much as I like Medicare-for-All as an end-point, having government paid Medicare for retirees and buy-in Medicare as an option for everyone (not just the 50+ set) who doesn't have or dissatisfied with private insurance would be very good. Coverage would be near-universal. Medicare would compete directly with private insurance and would win out in basic coverage. The buy-in Medicare pool would be so large that it would still be competitive with private insurance while probably helping to fix the funding issues with the current system.
But even without public option now, passing the Senate bill as is helps the long term universal/single-payer/Medicare expansion cause. It means we would have done everything else short of that, so Democrats running on health care would have to offer something. Converting to national exchanges, adding a small public option, expanding Medicare down from 65, covering "kids" through age 25, buy-ins, everything that remains to debate consists of what are now merely the progressive side of the argument. The genius of passing a center-right health care bill (as the Senate bill is) is that the future options for change are all left-of-center.
Actually, as much as I like Medicare-for-All as an end-point, having government paid Medicare for retirees and buy-in Medicare as an option for everyone (not just the 50+ set) who doesn't have or dissatisfied with private insurance would be very good. Coverage would be near-universal. Medicare would compete directly with private insurance and would win out in basic coverage. The buy-in Medicare pool would be so large that it would still be competitive with private insurance while probably helping to fix the funding issues with the current system.
But even without public option now, passing the Senate bill as is helps the long term universal/single-payer/Medicare expansion cause. It means we would have done everything else short of that, so Democrats running on health care would have to offer something. Converting to national exchanges, adding a small public option, expanding Medicare down from 65, covering "kids" through age 25, buy-ins, everything that remains to debate consists of what are now merely the progressive side of the argument. The genius of passing a center-right health care bill (as the Senate bill is) is that the future options for change are all left-of-center.
6
I'm so sick of gutless politicians. Fortunately, there is a politician with courage running in the 3rd. His name is Craig Pridemore
8
Side note: There will not be a Republican "nominee" nor a Democratic "nominee." We have a top-two system now. That means it is possible that the two candidates in the general election could both be of the same party, if they get the most votes. In this case, the most likely version of that would be Heck and Pridemore. (In fact, I'd made a small wager on that outcome right now.)
9
@4 He can't vote for it until he gets elected. Everyone who wants it passed wants it done before the election.
10
Good job pimping Denny Heck, Eli.
How's that working out for you?
The Stranger is a joke when it comes to covering Southwest Washington issues. You do better sticking to Seattle. Seen as how your sister publication, the Portland Mercury, won't dare cross the river to cover our issue, we're left with Eli Sanders' pathetic long-distance attempts to cover the 3rd Congressional race.
How's that working out for you?
The Stranger is a joke when it comes to covering Southwest Washington issues. You do better sticking to Seattle. Seen as how your sister publication, the Portland Mercury, won't dare cross the river to cover our issue, we're left with Eli Sanders' pathetic long-distance attempts to cover the 3rd Congressional race.
Advertisement
Most Commented on Slog
-
Hating People Doesn't Make Them Thinner by Jen Graves
-
Los Angeles Gay Bar Bans Bachelorette Parties Until Marriage Equality Is Attained by David Schmader
-
Fill in the Blank by Grant Brissey
-
This Reminds Me of the Great Calculator Scare of the Late '70s/Early '80s by David Schmader
-
Idiot Tries to Defend Bigoted Anti-Gay-Marriage Preacher on Anderson Cooper by Paul Constant
-
Six Moms with Too Much Time on Their Hands and a Shitty Website Decide to Fight Gay Superheroes by Paul Constant
-
Why Mayor McGinn's Wife Canceled Her Family's Seattle Times Subscription by Eli Sanders
-
What the Hell Is Wrong With Seattle's Pride Parade? by Dominic Holden
-
The Saturday Morning News by Unpaid Intern
-
NYC Man Ticketed for Not Riding in the Bike Lane by Jonathan Golob
RSS
Facebook
Twitter
Comments (10) RSS