Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Friday, February 19, 2010

Soul on Ice: A Word or Two About Brother Shani Davis

Posted by on Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 12:18 PM

In a very recent ST article about gold medalist Shani Davis...

Picture_1.png
  • Image by Mingo
The 27-year-old Chicago native skates with such grace and precision. He's a perfectionist, mastering his turns, doing whatever he must to trim a millisecond off his times. He's a fascinating sports figure, but he's as mysterious as he is gifted.

He coaches himself most of the time. He finds his own sponsors. He refuses to be a part of the United States' team pursuit, which has created controversy in the past two Olympics. He is the founder, president, CEO and publicist of Team Shani. And Team Shani's only mission is for you to appreciate watching him skate. Then leave him alone.

Surprisingly, Davis' rugged individualism is the source not of praise and admiration but controversy and ressentiment. But is he not the neoliberal ideal? And is not neoliberalism still alive and kicking? You only have to look in this week's paper to find a story about how our big financial and banking institutions still run the world. And though these institutions are supported by the government, their political program is still informed by neoliberalism—less government, more freedom for markets, less regulation, privatization of public wealth and resources.

By staying independent, not being a part of the "team America," securing his own sponsors, and personally managing the rewards of his genetic and learned talents, Shani Davis is only being consistent with the neoliberal program. He sees himself not as a human but as human capital—the main subject of the ninth chapter of Michel Foucault's excellent The Birth of Politics.

Because I do not have the book with me (it's at home), I will use this quote from a paper ("Managing Human Capital") by Professor Isleide Arruda Fontenelle to explain the human capital concept:

Based on this perspective, in his last piece of writing, “Naissance de la biopolitique,” the result of a course he taught at Collège de France in the late 1970s and which was published after his death, Foucault (2004) examines the analysis of neoliberalism and the radical change it promotes not only in the relations between the state and the market, but especially in the new relations between the market and the individual. In other words, in addition to presenting the new role the market plays, and the power it has to have social life revolve around its logic, Foucault resorts to the theory of human capital and to the conceptual shift this theory had on the concept of “homo oeconomicus,” or economic man.
In so doing, he argues that with neoliberalism we would be “facing a reconfiguration of the state and society, based on the market’s paramount principle, which is competition and not exchange, as in the origins of political economics”
An investment in, say, a child's education is an investment that expects a return. In a word, we must see ourselves as entrepreneurs—the ideal subject of the neoliberal order—and not as citizens. The entrepreneur is at base an inhabitant, and Davis is only being the kind of subject his moment most desires to produce. In the age of nationalism, it was a citizen—the citizen soldier. In the age of neoliberalism, it is an inhabitant. And an inhabitant is in a great position to become human capital, an entrepreneur.

 

Comments (8) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
Will in Seattle 1
But if this were true, wouldn't an investment in someone with a Doctorate in Philosophy mean that we wouldn't expect to find these poet warriors working behind the bar in the local dive, waiting tables, or pulling coffee for us from the local espresso machine?

That and you'd expect to see Arts Majors with Masters in French Expressionist Painting not doing cleanup at the local diner ...
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on February 19, 2010 at 12:24 PM
stinkbug 2
Has there been an explanation of his seemingly flip flop opinion on Colbert?
Posted by stinkbug on February 19, 2010 at 12:34 PM
Drone 3
One could argue that the controversy re: Davis' rugged individualism stems from the conflicted nature of the Olympics themselves; it is a stubbornly nationalistic institution (witness the flag-waving, anthems, and fervor of the crowds), though not completely immune from neoliberal colonization.
Posted by Drone on February 19, 2010 at 12:52 PM
4
@1:

Yes, but you have left out the central component of economic competition in neo-liberal cultural analysis. The philosophy and art grad fail because they lack a viable business plan.
Posted by Edward on February 19, 2010 at 12:54 PM
eric (the other one) 5
I was amazed at Davis' onscreen interviews. In sharp contrast to the subliterate ramblings of Lindsey Vonn and the jingoistic nonsense of most everyone else, Davis seemed thoughtful and calm. NBC seemingly couldn't get the camera off of him fast enough, though!
Posted by eric (the other one) on February 19, 2010 at 1:08 PM
6
I look forward to seeing a white actor in black face play him on stage someday.
Posted by Smiley Face on February 19, 2010 at 2:16 PM
7
Say what you will. He still skates like a sumbitch.
Posted by Toe Tag on February 19, 2010 at 3:34 PM
8
Blah blah blah. Don't care.
I think Shani Davis is the bomb and I also think the character Frozone from the movie "The Incredibles" was designed after him.
Discuss.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frozone
Posted by tacomagirl on February 19, 2010 at 6:06 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy