In a very recent ST article about gold medalist Shani Davis...
The 27-year-old Chicago native skates with such grace and precision. He's a perfectionist, mastering his turns, doing whatever he must to trim a millisecond off his times. He's a fascinating sports figure, but he's as mysterious as he is gifted.Surprisingly, Davis' rugged individualism is the source not of praise and admiration but controversy and ressentiment. But is he not the neoliberal ideal? And is not neoliberalism still alive and kicking? You only have to look in this week's paper to find a story about how our big financial and banking institutions still run the world. And though these institutions are supported by the government, their political program is still informed by neoliberalism—less government, more freedom for markets, less regulation, privatization of public wealth and resources.He coaches himself most of the time. He finds his own sponsors. He refuses to be a part of the United States' team pursuit, which has created controversy in the past two Olympics. He is the founder, president, CEO and publicist of Team Shani. And Team Shani's only mission is for you to appreciate watching him skate. Then leave him alone.
By staying independent, not being a part of the "team America," securing his own sponsors, and personally managing the rewards of his genetic and learned talents, Shani Davis is only being consistent with the neoliberal program. He sees himself not as a human but as human capital—the main subject of the ninth chapter of Michel Foucault's excellent The Birth of Politics.
Because I do not have the book with me (it's at home), I will use this quote from a paper ("Managing Human Capital") by Professor Isleide Arruda Fontenelle to explain the human capital concept:
Based on this perspective, in his last piece of writing, “Naissance de la biopolitique,” the result of a course he taught at Collège de France in the late 1970s and which was published after his death, Foucault (2004) examines the analysis of neoliberalism and the radical change it promotes not only in the relations between the state and the market, but especially in the new relations between the market and the individual. In other words, in addition to presenting the new role the market plays, and the power it has to have social life revolve around its logic, Foucault resorts to the theory of human capital and to the conceptual shift this theory had on the concept of “homo oeconomicus,” or economic man.An investment in, say, a child's education is an investment that expects a return. In a word, we must see ourselves as entrepreneurs—the ideal subject of the neoliberal order—and not as citizens. The entrepreneur is at base an inhabitant, and Davis is only being the kind of subject his moment most desires to produce. In the age of nationalism, it was a citizen—the citizen soldier. In the age of neoliberalism, it is an inhabitant. And an inhabitant is in a great position to become human capital, an entrepreneur.
In so doing, he argues that with neoliberalism we would be “facing a reconfiguration of the state and society, based on the market’s paramount principle, which is competition and not exchange, as in the origins of political economics”
1
3
5
Comments (8) RSS