Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Thursday, February 18, 2010

The Dog Owner's Revenge

Posted by on Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 11:58 AM

A moment ago, at a sunny street corner: a woman and her dog. The dog is biggish, black, shaggy, and leashed. It's sniffing some bush, then a patch of grass, then something on the concrete, then the area near my feet. At that moment, the moment before its muzzle meets and pulls some smell from the surface of my shoes, the woman pulls the dog away from me. The leashed animal looks up at her; she looks down at it and says: "No, honey, some people do not like dogs. I know, I know, but not everybody likes you. Some people hate you and we have to respect that." She gives the leash another strong pull, the dog chokes, surrenders, and runs to her side. Both walk across the street.

Now, why all of this talking? Dogs do not speak English, so the woman was actually speaking to me. She wanted to make me (of all people) feel guilty for not wanting my feet sniffed by some strange, dirty, hairy animal. Her lovely, lovely animal is not loved by everybody. This is not the dog's fault; it is the fault of the world. The dog lives in a world that happens have people like me—people who do not like it. The woman wanted me to see/hear that she was making a big, big effort to accommodate people like me—the faults of the world. Dog owners sometimes.

 

Comments (50) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
SchmuckyTheCat 1
That you don't like dogs makes it your fault. Why do you expect other people and their dogs to conform to you? You don't just "not like" dogs, you actively dislike them and spend consequential amounts of time dwelling on it and posting about it. Most people dislike lots of things. They don't make a big deal about it. You do. It's your problem.
Posted by SchmuckyTheCat on February 18, 2010 at 11:53 AM
2
No Charles, she was talking to her dog. The dog doesn't understand English linguistically, but it certainly understands aspects of the vocal communication she directed at it. Tone of voice and all that ho-ha.

Anyone who's ever had a pet where the pet is a being as much a part of your household as any person, and not a funny thing/other, knows you talk to them. This is how you create a society with them, by communicating, even though they might only understand the tiniest sliver of that communication. Creating a society with them leads to, usually, sane dogs who don't exist in virtual isolation.

What would be better, people trying to communicate with their dogs through body language and barking?
Posted by Lilting Missive on February 18, 2010 at 11:55 AM
attitude devant 3
Charles, the ideas you get sometimes! The lady was indeed speaking to you---but she wasn't trying to make you feel guilty, she was apologizing for her dog behaving like dogs do, without breaking our weird code of not speaking to strangers. She was also giving you a chance to say (if you were that kind of person) that you actually DO like dogs.

Which you aren't and don't. Which we all know.
Posted by attitude devant on February 18, 2010 at 11:59 AM
4
i would say that that woman WAS talking to you and telling you, hey i'm sorry, i understand you don't like dogs, so i'm respecting you and walking away. she was talking through her dog to get to you. i would say she was being respectul.
Posted by ke on February 18, 2010 at 12:00 PM
5
Being respectful would have just been keeping the dog away.

She doesn't need to flip some random guy a bunch of passive-aggressive bullshit about people not liking dogs and how tolerant she is of them.
Posted by doceb on February 18, 2010 at 12:03 PM
Old Mama Chips 6
I agree with Charles (for once!). She was passive-aggressively speaking to Charles and attempting to make him feel guilty for not loving dogs like "most" people do. You Seattle-ites are just as passive-aggressive as most Minnesotans, but here we have a cute little name for it: Minnesota Nice.
Posted by Old Mama Chips on February 18, 2010 at 12:03 PM
Julie in Eugene 7
I think attitude devant has it 100% right.

There's another possible aspect to it... I have two dogs. And I acknowledge that not everyone likes dogs. So, I try to be very aware of my dogs and their proximity to other people when I'm out and about in public. But, sometimes, if you correct your dog and don't let it approach someone, people will assume you have a mean dog. That you're pulling the dog away for their safety not because of the possibility that they may not like dogs.

Now, I don't prattle on about why I keep my dogs from approaching others like this woman seems to have. But, I completely understand the impulse to attempt to explain that you're not pulling the dog away because it is dangerous but because some people just don't like dogs. Especially if you're walking the dog in your neighborhood and you prefer that your neighbors not think that your pet is unsafe around people.
Posted by Julie in Eugene on February 18, 2010 at 12:07 PM
Denis Diderot 8
I usually like your posts. This one, however, is so narcissistic that I actually said, "What the fuck?" after reading it. The woman was being respectful of you, as other comments have pointed out. But apparently your world, at least as it relates to people who really love their companion animals, is so restricted that your voice is the only one you want to hear when out walking.

You probably have a cat too.
Posted by Denis Diderot on February 18, 2010 at 12:08 PM
J.T. Oldfield 9
I hate dogs. If I have to be subjected to this treatment from dog owners who reign in their dogs, so be it.

I do like cats (they have a much better understanding of personal space--sometimes they just choose not respect it, but at least they're aware of it, unlike say, dogs, or drunk people). I don't like people who baby talk their animals, and yet I can't help doing it to my kitten. It just comes out. He doesn't seem to understand English (baby talk or otherwise) but what's more puzzling is that he doesn't understand LOLz, either. He does understand shouting though, and I think he understands when my voice is affectionate.

Sorry for the rambling comment.
Posted by J.T. Oldfield http://bibliofreakblog.com on February 18, 2010 at 12:08 PM
10
The blog owner's revenge:
'I keep my mouth shut, then go home and blog some pseudophilosophical crap about a person.'

You see lady, Charles isn't speaking to us, he's speaking to you. Except he's so passive-aggressive that he waits an hour and seeks reinforcement later via a public forum.

It's not the blog's fault, it's the fault of the world.
Posted by Feme on February 18, 2010 at 12:10 PM
11
Its that dog with the white paw, isn't it? Isn't it?!
Posted by awaywego on February 18, 2010 at 12:19 PM
The Amazing Jim 12
Charles, she was inviting you to pet the dog while simultaniously giving you a polite way to refuse (i.e. be silent).
Posted by The Amazing Jim http://www.facebook.com/home.php?#/profile.php?id=100000076496291&ref=profile on February 18, 2010 at 12:20 PM
merry 13
Maybe she was just reacting to the expression on your face? If not actual fear, then maybe some disgust? Maybe you gave her some visual clues as to how you feel about dogs, and she was responding to that?

Or maybe she's a devoted Slogger and she recognized you? With your well-known and documented canine adversity, maybe she just wanted to accomodate your stated preferences?

In any event, are you ever capable of moving through the world in a non-solipsistic fashion? Because if you are, there is precious little evidence of it posted here to the Slog.
Posted by merry on February 18, 2010 at 12:20 PM
Fnarf 14
Charles is right. The dog's natural inclination is "like me, like me, like me". The dog owner's is not; but dog owners readily get confused on this point. What happened here was a demand (expressed in a passive-agressive way) that Charles love her dog as she herself does. That's not reasonable.
Posted by Fnarf http://www.facebook.com/fnarf on February 18, 2010 at 12:20 PM
15
I think she doesn't like big hairy black people and didn't want her big hairy black dog near you and just spouted some carefully worded BS to that effect. If you had been white, and the dog had been white, this would not have happened.
Posted by Cathy in Chicago on February 18, 2010 at 12:24 PM
Charles Mudede 16
@5, seriously, that is all she needed to do. pull the dog away. no need for this passive-aggressive business.
Posted by Charles Mudede on February 18, 2010 at 12:25 PM
very bad homo 17
I usually like dogs more than I like people.
Posted by very bad homo on February 18, 2010 at 12:26 PM
bklyn 18
um, but what kind of reaction were you giving her that made her ramble on? If the dog was just sniffing around, I doubt she'd have bothered to say all that, rather than just pull him away.
Posted by bklyn on February 18, 2010 at 12:30 PM
19
This lady is so Seattle. I hear that kind of thing ALL the time here. My friend and I were riding bikes in a park once without helmets and some guy yelled really loudly to his friends right as we were passing, "And THEN they don't even wear helmets!" It's so obnoxious.

But I'm sure you'll get lots of comments defending the lady as "just wanting to let you know..." because it's such an innate quality out here that people feel that's a legitimate form of communication and not just her passive-aggressive way of letting you know she's going out of her way to accomodate your "ridiculous" dislike of dogs, thus trying to make you feel bad.
Posted by Oh Seattle, you sure do suck on February 18, 2010 at 12:32 PM
20
Not all people like others named Charles, but you still persistently pester.
Posted by karel on February 18, 2010 at 12:32 PM
Dee 21
@9 - "I don't like people who baby talk their animals, and yet I can't help doing it to my kitten." I'm the same way. It always irked me when other people did it, but now I do it to my cats. I know that it's a completely nonsensical thing to do, but it just comes out naturally.
Posted by Dee on February 18, 2010 at 12:37 PM
mrbombit 22
Both of you suck. She is a passive aggressive typical seattle hipster. And you are a whinny, dont touch or talk to me city going cold isolated jerk. Let the damn dog smell you. Why the hell do you have to act like such a cold jerk. Get out enjoy being human, smell the flowers, talk to people, pet dogs, and the like. Man, no fun Charles, you are no fun.

I wish the damn dog would have bitten you. Jerk. Keep being cold and isolated and not enjoying life. I hope the SLOG provides you with adequate human contact. Because from the sounds of it, you are a freaking jerk to meet on the street. Now I see why you are so obsessed with going to Italy. You fit in there. Go walk a dog.
Posted by mrbombit on February 18, 2010 at 12:44 PM
laterite 23
Julie's probably made the most thoughtful comment so far about why she might have acted in this manner. Sheesh, okay, so she's a dog owner who's a bit verbose and maybe a little loopy. It's been known to happen. I usually just tell my dog, "No.", and move on. All this attribution of "passive aggressive" behavior on her part is getting a bit ridiculous. It's amazing that Seattle is increasingly childless yet simultaneously full of babies.
Posted by laterite on February 18, 2010 at 12:44 PM
24
Commenting on blogs is passive-aggressive.
Posted by mint chocolate chip on February 18, 2010 at 12:47 PM
25
You're leaving something out. The woman's alleged comments are extraordinarily out of proportion with the scenario you described.

You must have had a pretty strong reaction for her to say that.

Or you're BS'ing and she did not, in fact, say that.

Normally people wouldn't make presumptuous comments like that out of the blue.

What are you leaving out?

(PS it's possibly that she's crazy rude, but somehow i think you made a comment or a nasty face or something to warrant the comment)

(PPS - i'm not justifying her comment even if you did make a nasty face or a comment of your own - what she said was weird and annoying, but i still don't believe it was out of the blue)
Posted by pffft on February 18, 2010 at 12:48 PM
26
maybe she sensed that you were about to treat her dog like you treat horses.
Posted by jennam on February 18, 2010 at 12:53 PM
Chefgirl 27
I've known dog owners like that. I was once deep in conversation with my grandma when suddenly a big dog was upon me, rubbing its face down my pants leg and leaving a slimy trail of drool and snot. I stepped quickly away and said, "ick!" and the dog's owner who had let it (while leashed!) walk up to me simply because it wanted to) comforted it, "there there baby. I forget not everyone loves you like they should."

Really? Do most people really appreciate leashed animals climbing on them? I actually had to go change my clothes after that encounter.
Posted by Chefgirl on February 18, 2010 at 12:57 PM
Will in Seattle 28
At least dogs don't leave cigarette butts everywhere.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on February 18, 2010 at 1:02 PM
Charles Mudede 29
25, actually, i did not realize how close the dog was until she made the comment about there being dog haters in the world. I was in a conversation and the dog was not dominating my attention.
Posted by Charles Mudede on February 18, 2010 at 1:06 PM
aardvark 30
i don't like dog owners
Posted by aardvark on February 18, 2010 at 1:08 PM
31
"No, honey, some people do not like dogs. I know, I know, but not everybody likes you. Some people hate you and we have to respect that."

If she had left it at the first sentence, she could be given the benefit of the doubt, that she was just subtly indicating to Charles that she was trying to be considerate of him. That she continued on with her "poor me" crap thereafter proves Charles' point.
Posted by keshmeshi on February 18, 2010 at 1:09 PM
gloomy gus 32
@26, what, you mean she feared Charles might put her dog in one of his internationally acclaimed movies? Ooh, scary.
Posted by gloomy gus on February 18, 2010 at 1:09 PM
33
Charles, I believe that my dog is part cat. He acts very much like one. I think that you would like him very much, but he wouldn't like you to pet him.
Posted by JRT on February 18, 2010 at 1:10 PM
Reverse Polarity 34
People don't always behave rationally, Charles. Surely you must know that.

The logical analytical part of my brain understands that pets can't understand the English language. That has nevertheless never stopped me from talking to dogs and cats I take a liking to. I'm not talking to the humans around them. I'm just prattling affectionate nonsense to the pet.
Posted by Reverse Polarity on February 18, 2010 at 1:16 PM
Fifty-Two-Eighty 35
I really hate it when I agree with Charles, but in this case, he's right.
Posted by Fifty-Two-Eighty http://www.nra.org on February 18, 2010 at 1:33 PM
36
keshmeshi is right - if she'd just left it at the first sentence it would be fine. The rest of he blather is total passive aggressive crap. But I can't help but call #10 FTW.
Posted by genevieve on February 18, 2010 at 1:39 PM
37
I'm with #35...I totally agree with Charles, as frustrating as that statement is :) This is Seattle passive-aggressive at it's finest. All of you who disagree are no doubt people who also use this stupid way of telling the world that it owes you something.
Posted by stuffandthings on February 18, 2010 at 1:41 PM
chrisrnps 38
"Ask Me About The Deeply Profound Meaning Of A Dog Almost Sniffing My Shoe This Morning!"
Posted by chrisrnps http://www.dollfactory.org on February 18, 2010 at 1:55 PM
Simac 39
Not all dogs are equally intelligent or adept at understanding human language, of course, but the more intelligent breeds do in fact understand quite a bit; in this scientific study, the dog even understands German:

http://www.wired.com/science/discoveries…

Dogs are specially adapted/bred/evolved to be responsive to human language, human gestures, human body language, and human emotions. It's not merely a Pavlovian conditioning thing; it's been selected in their genes.

Dogs' passive language skills are also highly contextual (i.e. they aren't as good at generalization as humans are), and some smarter dogs likely have a vague understanding of past and future time.

Obviously some owners are crazy and think their dogs understand Sartre, too, but that woman you encountered probably says the same strings of words to her dog in similar contexts using the same tone of voice, and I would wager the dog has a rudimentary but good understanding that those syllables and that tone and people like you giving off certain body language cues all together mean "stay away from that one, but not because he's dangerous" or something along those lines.
Posted by Simac on February 18, 2010 at 1:56 PM
40
I can usually tell almost immediately if strangers are dog people and want to pet my dog. If they do, I'll let my dog walk over to them and say hello. If they're quiet, I'll keep her leashed, and if I space out and she walks over to them, I'll pull her in and apologize. I think that's the courteous behavior. Charles is right, everyone doesn't have to love your dog, children etc. And that doesn't make them an asshole.
Posted by Hosono on February 18, 2010 at 2:39 PM
41
As long as the dog is on a leash (and it was) you have no right to complain about anything. Assuming you can stay 6' away from the person. The person with the dog has the same right to be there as you do. It isn't against the law to be sniffed by a passing dog. Really.
Posted by Marine Mammal on February 18, 2010 at 2:54 PM
eric (the other one) 42
Agree with @3, @10 and @12 .

Don't assume passive aggression here--she may have been talking to her dog (I do). As someone pointed out, dogs certainly do hear tone of voice, and using vocal as well as physical cues makes for more effective training reinforcement. It seems to me that the likelihood that she was doing it in a way that invited you to answer without (gasp) speaking to a stranger in public is also highly likely.

Have you ever pondered why you have an aversion to animals?
Posted by eric (the other one) on February 18, 2010 at 3:14 PM
43
I've had many dog owners (and I actually love dogs, although I don't own one, and like to pet them if I'm allowed) who have handled that situation a lot better...mostly by just quickly pulling the dog away, smiling apologetically, and continuing about their business. The dog may have a right to be on the sidewalk, but it doesn't have any more right to get in someone's space than a person does, especially in a situation where it's 99% avoidable. This was pure passive-aggressive B.S. She could have left it at the "No, no honey" and it would have been fine.

A responsible pet owner respects others by scooping their poop, not letting their animal run wild and definitely not letting their animal approach whomever they please without some very distinct sign that it is ok by the other person. When someone chooses to enter a pet owner's home (which I am one), they do so with the understanding that they have to interact with the animal (or reach some sort of understanding with the owner, alerting them of any problems they may have so they can be dealt with). In public, I think it is only right and fair that one does not force, or allow their animal to force, their presence and opinions about such matters, upon complete strangers. Kinda like religion and politics.
Posted by tired of passive aggressiveness on February 18, 2010 at 3:17 PM
44
I think I'll join this opinion-fest, just for the helluva it. Dogs are cool, cats are cool and people are cool. Sometimes they aren't all cool in the same space because they don't "get" each other.

The chick with the dog may or may not have had the best of intentions, nobody here knows because none of us are in her brain.

The dog may have been trying to just say hi, or tell Mr. Mudede in his own doggie way something it thought was important. We don't know, because as a species, we've figured out crap-all about how to communicate in any meaningful manner with other species. Or with our own species, come to think of it.

Mr. Mudede seems cool from the posts I've read, but since I've never met him in person, I wouldn't be making a judgment on the man's behavior and what he may or may not have done to "make" the dog and the woman act that way. Maybe the post was ill-thought, but that's where our society is now -- blog and comment about every damn thought and opinion. The more controversy, the more readership, the more views.

Hook, line and sinker -- all over a dog sniffing shoes.
Posted by Lana on February 18, 2010 at 3:33 PM
KatieDewi 45
nah, I'm with Charles. The use of the word "hate" was over the top and hints at her true intentions...
Posted by KatieDewi on February 18, 2010 at 3:35 PM
threnody 46
I am allergic to dogs and get myself out of the way if I see them coming. Often this courtesy is rewarded with a nasty look or passive-aggressive monologues like the one Charles described. In Seattle only, I might add...I haven't noticed this attitude in any other city I've lived in. I broke out in rash once from a dog jumping on me and had a lady say "oh, wow, I thought you were always just saying you were allergic because you didn't like dogs." Yeah. I hate fun, too. I should really stop and smell the flowers and enjoy life. With a fucking rash. (I should add I do like some dogs. Mostly the short-haired ones that don't jump on me.)
Posted by threnody on February 18, 2010 at 5:40 PM
47
@19 for the win

Seattle has perfected the merge of Minnesotan passive-aggression with West Coast sanctimony bred from a personal code, philosophy or from politics.
Posted by UberAlles on February 18, 2010 at 7:20 PM
48
My dog doesn't speak anything, but he sure as hell understands english and french. And he, like many dogs I know of, can tell the time. I tell him, 'we go out in 20 minutes.' He goes away and comes back, expectant, in 18 minutes (he's got the punctual thing from his other mother).

I think the owner of that dog was doing everything that everyone else suggested. A little passive-agressive, yes, and also giving you the opportunity to say hello. A combo platter. I tend to not go overboard when I'm with my monster. I talk out loud to him while also signalling to the person that the dog is friendly if he/she so chooses to pet him. But I don't want anyone to feel badly about not petting him.
Posted by sheiler on February 19, 2010 at 7:19 AM
49
I agree with Charles, she was putting him down for not cooing over her pet. Many dog owners go to great lengths to use their dogs to interact with other people. Several how-to-get-a-date guides suggest dogs as a way to meet prospective partners.

There is a particularly annoying woman who rides the #43 bus with her lovely Irish setter. she has one of those long extension leashes. When she boards the bus she has it short. She always sits at the very back, where she then extends it so the dog can walk around and sniff passsengers or cadge pats. Some people compliment the dog and she lights up, when other people ask her to keep the dog to herself she gets very huffy. One fellow told her the extended cord was a safety hazard to standing passengers and she actually argued that it is up to people to look out for themselves, which ironically is exactly what the fellow was doing.

I was raised to never interact with other people's dogs unless you knew them and had permission. the very good reason for this is that the dog may be in obedience training and distacting them is both rude and detrimental. European dogs in public are a joy to be around because they are trained to leave others alone.
Posted by thatsnotright on February 19, 2010 at 11:20 AM
50
"Some people hate you" is clearly a usage of the passive-aggressive bullshit that runs endemic in this town. If the woman really had a problem with you not gushing over her dumb smelly animal, she should of at least had enough spine to be a confrontational moron.
Posted by Angry Sam on February 20, 2010 at 9:24 AM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy