Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Wednesday, February 17, 2010

Re: Sucks to Be the South Park Bridge Today

Posted by on Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 11:50 AM

SouthParkBridge.jpg
  • Benjamin Cody
Vulcan spokesman David Postman responds to my earlier post:

A few points about the stimulus grants. One of the key requirements for a project to get funding was that it had to be ready to go to bid. Mercer Street is. South Park Bridge is not.

The two projects were not pitted against each other because South Park didn't meet the requirements. If Mercer wasn’t in the running, that money still wouldn’t have gone to South Park. It's unfortunate that it gets portrayed as neighborhood v. neighborhood.

And Mercer is about much more than car commuters. For the first time, that section of Mercer will include bike lanes and sidewalks. It is a project with strong support from bike advocates. It will also allow transit to add stops in the area, one of the most under-served parts of the city core.

There was a great public process that led up to Mercer being able to get funding. There were stakeholder groups and public meetings and help from organized labor, all the arts groups at Seattle Center and much more.

We all—the city and the county—need to take the model that finally got Mercer funded after nearly 50 years of complaining about it and put that to work to get South Park what it needs, as well as other parts of Seattle.

Meanwhile, King County Exec Dow Constantine promises to fight on for South Park Bridge funding, saying in a statement:

I am very disappointed for the people of King County that our application for federal stimulus funding to replace the South Park Bridge was not approved.

While the bridge competed against a lot of other worthy projects, replacing this key transportation link is imperative to the economic health of affordable, diverse neighborhoods and the hundreds of industrial businesses that depend on direct vehicular access to State Route 99 and Interstate 5. It may not be a glamorous or high-profile project, but it’s one that is vitally important to our economy and our society.

I am determined to pursue funding for this project through future TIGER grant cycles, the jobs bill, other federal appropriations, and the state Legislature.

At present, the South Park Bridge is scheduled to be shut down this June.

 

Comments (12) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
Will in Seattle 1
The big question is why the South Park bridge wasn't ready to go to bid - it's like city council and county don't care about freight and jobs if they don't impact billionaires.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on February 17, 2010 at 11:57 AM
2
I question the claim that the South Park Bridge isn't "ready". The county has contracted with WSDOT to do property acquisition. I received a letter last year telling me that my boat would have to be moved from the marina, and it has been moved.. Land is already being cleared on the west side of the river.

If this project isn't ready, then what the hell is?
Posted by Citizen R on February 17, 2010 at 12:16 PM
Westlake, son! 3
"shut down".... what does that mean? To heavy truck? Cars? Bicycles? Pedestrians? Boats underneath?

I'm guessing it'll be perpetually up if it's shut down? One way to actually shut it down, but that would suck for emergency responders having to go the long way around...
Posted by Westlake, son! on February 17, 2010 at 12:24 PM
Will in Seattle 4
It means shut down.

As in totally.

As in not being usable.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on February 17, 2010 at 12:48 PM
Will in Seattle 5
By the way, if you're outraged at this, try phoning you city councilmembers, especially the Vulcan apologists like Tim Burgess.

Any time they get more than 10 phone calls on an issue, it's a big deal for them.

Any time.

ACTIONS speak louder than online blog posts.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on February 17, 2010 at 12:49 PM
6
Are we not about to create a Montlake Mess with the new 520 bridge? There's no way the current preferred configuration will leave the neighborhood livable. It will permanently disrupt cross-cut traffic (it's already nearly impossible to cross the cut at Montlake) and ruin what is now a nice, established neighborhood that is walkable to the UW and offers great interconnection with nature. In ten years, the complaining will be at fever pitch and all our electeds will be clamoring for a "solution" when we ought to just insist they build what we need now.
Posted by ScreenName on February 17, 2010 at 2:34 PM
7
"It will also allow transit to add stops in the [Mercer] area, one of the most under-served parts of the city core."


Well, you've got the fancy ass streetcar, the only one in the whole damn city. Is that not good enough? Do we need to buy you another one?
Posted by shabadoo on February 17, 2010 at 2:35 PM
Will in Seattle 8
@6 - yes. If we expand HOV lanes on 520, we create a bigger Montlake mess, which will exacerbate the Mercer Mess that even the proponents admit will reduce time to get thru Mercer to I-5 by 4 minutes with their "fix".

Basically, the only solution, other than more cowbell, is more transit-only lanes.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on February 17, 2010 at 2:39 PM
Will in Seattle 9
(reduce == increase - as in takes 4 minutes longer for your car to get there)
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on February 17, 2010 at 2:40 PM
10
The South Park Bridge:

Allowing murdering rapists into the hood to murder the Stranger's demographic since 2009.
Posted by Davy Jones on February 17, 2010 at 3:25 PM
11
Just to set the record straight on the construction readiness of the South Park Bridge, the project is ready to go. King County has completed all the federally required environmental work for the bridge –the final environmental impact statement was signed this past December. The plans are 100% complete. We know there are future funding opportunities ahead and we will aggressively pursue them.

Rochelle Ogershok
King County Dept. of Transportation
Posted by Rochelle on February 17, 2010 at 3:45 PM
12
Postman is very wrong when he reports that South Park was not ready for these funds. It is ready. It is just not as ready as Mercer. Plus it needed three times as much money as Mercer. Very dumb communication by Postman on behalf of one of the world's richest men.

It will be fun to see McGinn out there with the Governor tomorrow advocating a project she promised to chase funds for to get the tunnel deal on the Viaduct. The city also made the case that Mercer is really part of the 520 jobs corridor, which also has a special irony.

There is also a special irony in knowing that McGinn campaigned against replacing the South Park bridge - as did Ron Sims - when they opposed the road and transit ballot a few years ago. That was the real blow to plans for the South Park bridge.

Now that Dow is Executive, the new bridge will get done. There should be no doubt about that. The feds made the right call this time. And even if you disagree, most people will find it reasonable. The people who won't just don't like the plan to improve Mercer, period.

They lost.
Posted by BetterTransitNow on February 17, 2010 at 5:09 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy