Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Friday, February 12, 2010

How To Survive Falling From An Airplane. Seriously.

Posted by on Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 12:47 PM

Attention Slog readers: What I am about to tell could save your life! Yes, yours! (But it probably won’t.)

While watching Lost recently (well, Newsweek’s recap of Lost) I began wondering about the probability of actually surviving an airplane crash. Luckily they have a website for that. Well, kind of. Really they have a website about what you should do if you find yourself falling from an airplane with no parachute.

Now you would probably think the odds of you surviving are pretty slim. And you’d be right. But why not die trying?

Your best bet is to get a hunk of wreckage to “cushion” your fall. In 1972, Serbian flight attendant Vesna Vulovic fell 33,000 feet from her exploding airplane. Luckily, she had the presence of mind to accidentally wedge herself between her seat, a nearby catering trolley, a hunk of burning airplane, and a conveniently placed corpse into the snow. She lived, as have 32 other “wreckage riders” (since the 1940s).

If you can’t find a bunch of random shit to shield you from your imminent doom, don’t panic. (Ha.) Of the tens of thousands of others who’ve found themselves in similar predicaments over the last seven decades, thirteen others have lived. Here is how, courtesy of Popular Mechanics magazine.

Glass hurts, but it gives. So does grass. Haystacks and bushes have cushioned surprised-to-be-alive free-fallers. Trees aren’t bad, though they tend to skewer. Snow? Absolutely. Swamps? With their mucky, plant-covered surface, even more awesome. Hamilton documents one case of a sky diver who, upon total parachute failure, was saved by bouncing off high-tension wires. Contrary to popular belief, water is an awful choice. Like concrete, liquid doesn’t compress. Hitting the ocean is essentially the same as colliding with a sidewalk…

With a target in mind, the next consideration is body position. To slow your descent, emulate a sky diver. Spread your arms and legs, present your chest to the ground, and arch your back and head upward. This adds friction and helps you maneuver. But don’t relax. This is not your landing pose.
Water landings—if you must—require quick decision-making. Studies of bridge-jump survivors indicate that a feet-first, knife-like entry (aka “the pencil”) best optimizes your odds of resurfacing.

The famed cliff divers of Acapulco, however, tend to assume a head-down position, with the fingers of each hand locked together, arms outstretched, protecting the head. Whichever you choose, first assume the free-fall position for as long as you can. Then, if a feet-first entry is inevitable, the most important piece of advice, for reasons both unmentionable and easily understood, is to clench your butt.

So the next time you find yourself hurtling towards the ground, and your near-inevitable demise, breath deep, think back and remember all of the above. You can thank me later.

 

Comments (19) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
nothing refreshes like a sky diving enema.
Posted by UNPAID COMMENTER on February 12, 2010 at 1:08 PM
Will in Seattle 2
I don't see why this is such a big deal.

Back when I was in college one of my classmates survived her chute not opening during a skydive, and landed in some trees.

If you can avoid the trunk, tree branches, while they will hurt - a lot - are your friend.

Pavement ... never is.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on February 12, 2010 at 1:24 PM
Fnarf 3
Will doesn't see why this is such a big deal. Says so right there.
Posted by Fnarf http://www.facebook.com/fnarf on February 12, 2010 at 1:28 PM
seandr 4
This post is fucking awesome.
Posted by seandr on February 12, 2010 at 1:31 PM
Fifty-Two-Eighty 5
Fnarf, maybe we should all get together and throw Will out of an airplane.
Posted by Fifty-Two-Eighty http://www.nra.org on February 12, 2010 at 1:40 PM
Will in Seattle 6
@5 - lol. You'd better bring two chutes.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on February 12, 2010 at 1:55 PM
Confluence 7
@4

I concur! I was impressed. Fucking interesting & useful! Keep it comin' Jake.
Posted by Confluence on February 12, 2010 at 1:58 PM
Belly 8
Ahhhhh! I think I'm having a panic attack right now.
Posted by Belly on February 12, 2010 at 2:01 PM
lostboy 9
"Tens of thousands of others," really? That number seems high, but a casual google has failed to turn up a source to confirm or refute.
Posted by lostboy http://plus.google.com/104883658551712008719 on February 12, 2010 at 2:07 PM
Timmytee 10
Damn. I was ready to learn all about the "Immanence of Doom", but you fixed it!
Posted by Timmytee on February 12, 2010 at 2:09 PM
11
@9 According to the article in question, 118,934 people have died in plane crashes since 1940, and that doesn't include failed parachutists. I felt that tens of thousands probably fits within those numbers. Or maybe not. Who knows.
Posted by Jake Blumgart on February 12, 2010 at 2:24 PM
Will in Seattle 12
All I know about is that one women. No broken bones, by the way, but man she got bruised up.

Pine trees ftw.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on February 12, 2010 at 2:39 PM
Fnarf 13
@11, most plane crashes happen on the ground, not in the air. Takeoffs and landings are the most dangerous times. The 583 who died at Tenerife in 1977 wouldn't have had much use for improved falling technique, seeing as how a 747 taking off ran into another 747 taxiing on the same runway:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tenerife_ai…
Posted by Fnarf http://www.facebook.com/fnarf on February 12, 2010 at 2:54 PM
Jessica 14
Just so you know, this post is what will be running through my head when I take a second Klonopin on my flight next month.
Posted by Jessica on February 12, 2010 at 2:55 PM
lostboy 15
Fnarf @11, that's what I was thinking as well.  I'd be interested to find stats on people who either fell from an aircraft in-flight or were aboard an aircraft that broke up at altitude.
Posted by lostboy http://plus.google.com/104883658551712008719 on February 12, 2010 at 3:58 PM
Fnarf 16
@15, not to mention that exiting an airplane at 500 MPH at an altitude of 25,000 feet is going to have more complications than how you land, as Clarabelle Lansing would undoubtedly tell you if she was still alive: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aloha_Airli…
Posted by Fnarf http://www.facebook.com/fnarf on February 12, 2010 at 4:47 PM
Will in Seattle 17
@16 - I'm thinking the crushing of the midsection of the plane from the magnetic forces released by the failure of a certain Dharma station might make your lack of a parachute moot.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on February 12, 2010 at 5:11 PM
lostboy 18
Fnarf @16, by way of comparison, military parachutists typically jump from aircraft travelling at most 135 knots.
Posted by lostboy http://plus.google.com/104883658551712008719 on February 12, 2010 at 6:06 PM
Greg 19
It seems like reminding a man falling toward the water at 120+ mph to clench his sphincter would be unnecessary.
Posted by Greg on February 13, 2010 at 2:28 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy