Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Thursday, February 11, 2010

The Mayor Has Answered

Posted by on Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 3:15 PM

Mayor Mike McGinn fielded scads of questions over in Questionland this afternoon. Read all of his answer HERE.

One reader asked about the 520 bridge and the viaduct: "do you have an actual plan and timeline for rebuilding our infrastructure or will you continue planning and replanning forever?"

I intend to stand up for Seattle residents on 520. Planning a transit-friendly option is more likely to lead to getting the bridge replaced, rather than trying a jam a big highway through Seattle neighborhoods without transit.

As for rebuilding infrastructure, I have put forward a plan to replace our deteriorating seawall, which could fail in an earthquake, will put a light rail plan on the ballot within two years and am dedicated to funding bike, pedestrian and bus improvements.

Another reader asked why McGinn hired Chris Bushnell, the adviser with a past record of bank fraud, who resigned last week. Said the mayor:

I met Chris Bushnell several years ago when he was Chief Economist at King County. He had been working there for a number of years. He volunteered on the Roads and Transit campaign. About 6-9 months after I met him, he told me about his felony conviction from when he was in his late teens.

I worked with him on the Parks Levy campaign and my campaign for mayor. He is a very smart and capable individual. After the campaign, I asked him to join my office.

When I learned that he had misrepresented that he had a Ph.D., I had a frank and open discussion with him about the implications of that. He then resigned, which was the right decision.

See his answers on many more issues—the SLUT, decriminalizing pot, improvement for bicycles, light rail, and oh-so-much-more—over HERE.

 

Comments (7) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
"oh-so-much-more". I wouldn's say that. He answered 18 questions. Most of them pretty soft-ball or ones with predictable answers.
I'm curious what the other questions were and why he didn't tackle them.
Posted by not impressed on February 11, 2010 at 3:57 PM
Will in Seattle 2
I notice we still have the question about what he plans to do with pit bulls riding light rail unanswered.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on February 11, 2010 at 4:08 PM
Rotten666 3
Oh so much more my ass. Half the questions were about transit, a couple about Internet access, and an idiotic pie in the sky question about carbon neutrality.

NOT IMPRESSED.
Posted by Rotten666 on February 11, 2010 at 5:04 PM
4
Mike McGinn:
I intend to stand up for Seattle residents on 520. Planning a transit-friendly option is more likely to lead to getting the bridge replaced, rather than trying a jam a big highway through Seattle neighborhoods without transit.

I'm a big-time Mike McGinn supporter, but a statement like this has me scratching my head. Either he's trying to demagogue this issue or he's grossly ill-informed. And honestly, I'm not sure which.

How is the existing plan so transit-unfriendly? And how is the alternative out there so dramatically better for transit that the existing plan needs to be stood up to? Whether or not you lay tracks across the bridge isn't going to do much to accelerate building light rail across that corridor. That corridor is going to take a heck of a lot of money because it can't feed into Central Link, and our region's light rail expansion has higher-priority corridors to fund first.

Frankly, I don't see anything inherently anti-transit about the current plan. Could it be made more pro-transit? Sure. Make the HOV lanes transit-only and leverage that fact to optimize connecting to the Husky Stadium light rail station. (I don't even know whether the latter is possible.) But that doesn't exactly make the current plan a defeat for transit.
Posted by cressona on February 11, 2010 at 5:05 PM
kk in seattle 5
@4: His answer (translated) is: "Of course I have no plan or timeline whatsoever to replace the 520 floating bridge or the Alaskan Way viaduct. Thanks for asking."

(You're right on 520, BTW. We won't have the light rail line across the lake on I-90 for 20 years, minimum. So it would be another 20 years after that, at least, before we could support a second light rail line across the lake. By then, we'll likely need a new bridge. They don't last forever.)
Posted by kk in seattle on February 11, 2010 at 6:14 PM
CBSeattle 6
I thought the Bushnell answer was great. I like many people had heard about this problem but didn't bother looking into it. Is just sounded like a minor scandal that I've come to expect. When I heard that he was supportive of Bushnell, I wondered why. My first impression (based on nothing but innuendo) was that he was doing a Bush stand-by-your-man thing.

So that was very helpful. I get it now.

Much of the rest of it I found to be bland political talk. So unlike the McGinn who answered the Marijuana question as a candidate.

I think it was a lost opportunity to clarify his position and leadership on some important issues. Clearly we are obsessed with transportation issues and it's great that he answered those. But I'm really as confused now as I was before I read the answers.
Posted by CBSeattle http://www.yousaidit.com on February 11, 2010 at 8:22 PM
7
I asked the Bushnell hiring question because I wondered if the Mayor would hedge on what had been reported by his aide Matassa (i.e., that he'd tried to talk Bushnell out of resigning). And he did, by saying that Bushnell's resignation was the right thing. If so, why did he try to talk Bushnell out of it?

The guy just can't say anything straight two days in a row.
Posted by sarah68 on February 11, 2010 at 8:54 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy