Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Thursday, February 11, 2010

The Inputtiest Mayor of All Time

Posted by on Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 11:01 AM

On the heels of recently released video and court records allegedly detailing a teenage girl beating another teenage girl in the downtown transit tunnel—after the victim reportedly warned security, who looked on during the attack—Mayor Mike McGinn posted a video announcing plans for his Youth and Families Initiative. We need to "ask people what needs to be done and what we need to do differently," he says.

mcginn_youth_and_families.jpg

Among the steps in the process: Five town halls where people break into groups and elect delegates, 50 to 100 community caucuses, where more delegates will be elected, and finally a a congress later this year.

Meanwhile, public hearings for the police chief are underway, but the first one drew small audience.

 

Comments (30) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
Joe Szilagyi 1
Let's have a town hall on how to respond to the need for police in the Metro tunnels instead of private security.
Posted by Joe Szilagyi http://www.joeszilagyi.com on February 11, 2010 at 10:59 AM
Joe Szilagyi 2
Although, I have to admit, the long-term potential of this--giving control of the city to regular people instead of useless insiders and the traditional power players like the property owners--is appealing, if the theory works out.
Posted by Joe Szilagyi http://www.joeszilagyi.com on February 11, 2010 at 11:00 AM
Fnarf 3
I spent two minutes trying to figure out what "unputtiest" might possibly mean until I figured it out. I amb dumb.

If he wants to know what people think, why is he holding these meetings where only kooks and drones show up? He should already know what people want.
Posted by Fnarf http://www.facebook.com/fnarf on February 11, 2010 at 11:00 AM
michaelp 4
Can we have a series of town halls to discuss the necessity of town halls for the purpose of governing?
Posted by michaelp on February 11, 2010 at 11:01 AM
Sargon Bighorn 5
The Mayor has quickly fallen into the same old silly solution pit "Let's hold hands and get along." No Mayor the problem is not Youth nor Families. The problem is security. Let families deal with families. And let youth deal with youth (But when youth and families start beating each other in Public, use the police). This is a no brainer Mayor.
Posted by Sargon Bighorn on February 11, 2010 at 11:01 AM
6
Condoms and free abortions would help, in that order.
Posted by Davy Jones on February 11, 2010 at 11:04 AM
7
has he gained weight?
Posted by i on February 11, 2010 at 11:05 AM
Joe Szilagyi 8
Since I'm sure Mayor Mike, Aaron, or both are going to be reading this--how about also doing something online? The in-person stuff will get you one class and grade of people, but there are a lot of people that may or may not have the time to come out physically.

E-polls are often stupid, but if you guys did something like

1) setup a **SIMPLE** online form that required no registration--you click on the URL, and get to list out the top 5 things you need the city to address, change or institute. Email, name/phone etc. are all optional. Keep it vanilla, and you'll get more takers.

2) Someone goes through and goes through all the submissions, tabulating them. You'll get some overlap, and some doofus stuff--"Free weed for all the visitors to the zoo" or some nonsense--but narrow it down to all the stuff that the city legally can do.

3) Now do a count for which has the most support from the submissions under #1. Even if it's potentially politically unpopular stuff with us lefties.

4) Put up a simple online poll (and for the love of God, talk to actual 3rd party IT people that know how to secure these things from being gamed without making them restrictive--it can be done). Limit the poll to the Top 5-10 items overall from all the suggestions, by pure voter feedback/count. Every person gets to choose 3 items from the list only--what are your priorities as a Seattle citizen or area resident? You'd probably be unable to limit it to just Seattle residents from a technical standpoint, the same as you can't keep a Kirkland guy out of your physical town halls.

5) Unleash that poll on Seattle.

6) The top 3 by numerical result? There's your legislative agenda.

If done right, formatted/advertisted right--Facebook, twitter, newspaper, TV/radio/these various blogs--you'd get a SIGNIFICANTLY broader amount of input than any number of physical meetings. We're a heavily wired city. Use that.
More...
Posted by Joe Szilagyi http://www.joeszilagyi.com on February 11, 2010 at 11:10 AM
9
Oh yeah, the property owners are the "power players"...
Meanwhile its the RENTERS who love saying yes to all levies that raise the property taxes!
Posted by As IF! on February 11, 2010 at 11:15 AM
Joe Szilagyi 10
Oh, and the suggestion collection and actual poll phases, for duration:

Suggestions: 2 weeks at least, but any longer and like most internet things, people will forget it. Most action will come in the opening days. Pimp the hell out of it in the beginning and 24-48 hours before the end.

Polling: 1 week, tops--this is a direct democracy event; hype it that way and people will participate, since people love to vote on online stuff. Just look at the onslaught of stupid personality polls we all do on Facebook and wherever else. Now the MAYOR is offering one where YOU can influence the FATE of the ENTIRE CITY? You'll get eyes on it. The polling especially should be pimped for the duration.
Posted by Joe Szilagyi http://www.joeszilagyi.com on February 11, 2010 at 11:15 AM
michaelp 11
@8 -

OR, he can do what he was elected to do, and govern. If his proposals don't pass muster with the Council (who were all elected by much wider margins), then those don't happen. If they do, they do.
Posted by michaelp on February 11, 2010 at 11:16 AM
Joe Szilagyi 12
@9 Property owners = wealthy = able to contribute more financially to politics = more direct access to government = power.

Renters = mathematical majority = why shouldn't they have the voting power? That's sort of how America on paper is supposed to be, with the constraint against abuse being the Constitution.

Or are you actually implying that property owners deserve more rights and authority than non-property owners?
Posted by Joe Szilagyi http://www.joeszilagyi.com on February 11, 2010 at 11:18 AM
Joe Szilagyi 13
@11 or that, yes. My point is simply that if McGinn really wants tons of direct input and suggestions for the agenda and direction of the city--that's a good thing, by the way--then limiting it to just who shows up physically is a pedestrian and 20th century way of thinking.
Posted by Joe Szilagyi http://www.joeszilagyi.com on February 11, 2010 at 11:20 AM
mrbombit 14
Can we have a town-hall about all the town-halls? Man, I am beginning to feel like I am in the movie Groundhog's day. Every day the "People's mayor" has some great town-hall, where he takes everyone's input, with no action.

Is this guy just going to obstruct regional government and talk to hipsters his whole time in office? Probably.
Posted by mrbombit on February 11, 2010 at 11:22 AM
gloomy gus 15
The poor dear. Mike fires Painter from heading Human Services and offers no replacement, and last week Dow hires Painter as his head Human Services advisor. Mike demotes Dively from heading Budget, and today Dow hires Dively away to head Budget for the County.

And then Mike's hair starts looking like that. He's had a rough February in some ways.
Posted by gloomy gus on February 11, 2010 at 11:26 AM
nseattlite 16
This is going to be a clusterf*ck of confusion with the caucuses the Democrats are holding this spring with their legislative districts to elect delegates to the state convention. yay.
Posted by nseattlite on February 11, 2010 at 11:26 AM
17
I'm sorry, last time I checked I'm far from wealthy. I just work my fucking ass off and therefore am able to afford a home. Not saying property owners deserve anymore rights than renters, but your assumption makes you a total douche. What makes you think only the wealthy own homes? What about the hard workers who do the extra work to make the money they need to afford a home? Maybe try working your ass off too and perhaps one day it will pay off. Sorry I can't sit and argue this all day with you, but I am running off to work - you know, to make money - so I can support my family and pay my property taxes so people like you can enjoy the pleasures of this great city that MY property taxes make possible. Enjoy your afternoon on Slog!
Posted by As IF! on February 11, 2010 at 11:30 AM
Hernandez 18
@4 Sure, but first we need to have a series of town hall meetings to plan out and discuss how the series of town hall meetings to discuss the necessity of town hall meetings for governing will empower and mobilize city government to effectively address public security concerns using the town hall meeting format. God damn, I'm good. Someone get me a job in the McGinn administration!
Posted by Hernandez http://hernandezlist.blogspot.com on February 11, 2010 at 11:36 AM
19
Yeah and you get to deduct every single penny from your income tax (as well as all interest).

Home owners = largest single subsidized housing group in the country.
Posted by gnossos on February 11, 2010 at 11:36 AM
Joe Szilagyi 20
@17 and your answer paints you as the douche, because that assumes my rental payments don't go right back into the same levies. Last time I checked, my rental costs go up annually.

And as a former property owner, I had absolutely no problem paying for schooling levies, even though I don't have any kids.

My comment was aimed more at the commercial property owners, anyway. The Seligs, Freemans, and the Vulcans of the world.
Posted by Joe Szilagyi http://www.joeszilagyi.com on February 11, 2010 at 11:41 AM
21
As If! - Do you think landlords don't pass on property tax to their renters? Do you think any landlords will rent at a loss? Home-owners and renters all pay property tax - just some pay directly to the gov't and others pay via their landlords.
Posted by TJ on February 11, 2010 at 11:44 AM
michaelp 22
@18 -

Touche. However, we could, instead, negate the need for the town halls to plan the town halls that discuss the need of town halls by doing some sort of internet based thing, wherein we can vote on dates, places, times, and the specific part of security issues and governance issues, with comments regarding empowerment. Of course, if we did this, we would need to add at least three, if not six, additional town halls to make up for the lack of town halls to discuss the town halls, and to ensure we are accommodating people who lack access to the internet, or don't have super duper fast broadband, just super fast broadband, and therefore cannot be expected to wait for the internet page to open for the pre-planning.
Posted by michaelp on February 11, 2010 at 11:51 AM
Baconcat 23
Nickels was hated because he didn't listen to the citizens, McGinn is hated because he listens to the citizens.

The happy medium is clearly a mayor that does nothing.
Posted by Baconcat on February 11, 2010 at 11:57 AM
24
kumbaiya fest 2010!
Surely, this will solve all of the City's problems as monkeys fly out of Our ass. It will work because those monkeys will be designated neighborhood delegates.
Posted by Zander on February 11, 2010 at 12:15 PM
25
ah hahahahaha
hahaha
hoho
hee hee hee....

this is a joke, right?

...isn't it?

the mayor isn't Really proposing

Five town halls (where people break into groups and elect delegates)

50 to 100 community caucuses (where MORE delegates will be elected)

and,

finally-

a congress.

later this year.

is he?....
Posted by ... is he?! on February 11, 2010 at 12:26 PM
Hernandez 26
@23 Hey, come on. Good-natured mockery is not the same thing as hate. As long as this town hall meeting bonanza actually produce results (and I'm willing to be patient and give it some time), I'll be satisfied.
Posted by Hernandez http://hernandezlist.blogspot.com on February 11, 2010 at 12:30 PM
michaelp 27
@26

I suggest we have a town hall to determine if, in fact, good-natured mockery is the same thing as hate. While I agree with your assumption that it is not, all voices should be heard on this topic in an open setting where ideas can flow back and forth, and we can come to a final conclusion.
Posted by michaelp on February 11, 2010 at 1:29 PM
michaelp 28
@3

I just got what "Inputtiest" meant. I was pronouncing is wrong in my brain. And I've already commented multiple times...goddamn I'm slow.
Posted by michaelp on February 11, 2010 at 1:30 PM
Will in Seattle 29
Remember, if you're not a Corporation, the US Supreme Court says you are either a Serf or Chattel.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on February 11, 2010 at 2:04 PM
tabletop_joe 30
I'm not sure if it's coincidence, but there were police patrolling the tunnel today around 2pm.
Posted by tabletop_joe on February 11, 2010 at 3:25 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy