Find Your Valentine
Slog
News & ArtsThursday, February 11, 2010
News Grab-n-Go Baristas Fight Prostitution Charges
Posted by Cienna Madrid on Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 3:34 PM
The five baristas charged with prostitution for their work at Grab n Go Espresso all have hearings scheduled at Everett Municipal court today. At least three of the women are fighting the charges of prostitution (one woman didn't show up for her hearing, and now a warrant has been issued for her arrest, according to a lawyer at the hearing).
"I’m scouring to find a case—ever, in the history of the United States—like this one that proves prostitution, and I can’t because it’s a stretch,” said Attorney Brian Sullivan, who is representing one of the baristas, Kristina Evenson.
Undercover Everett police officers patronized the drive-through coffee stand in Snohomish County over a period of two months last summer. To build their case, police snapped over a dozen photos of the women showing their breasts and genitalia—turning the women into unwilling porn stars when a public records request made the images public. (You can see the NSFW pictures here.)
“It’s really a matter of what’s an appropriate response in light of what the complaints are," Sullivan said of the city's actions. "Is throwing money at a girl’s bra a sex act? I don’t think it is.” The women all face similar charges despite engaging in a range of different behaviors.
In addition to prostitution, the city prosecutor charged the women with failing to be properly licensed as adult entertainers and failing to adhere to standards of conduct at public places of adult entertainment ("exposing a portion of the female pubic region or buttocks or breasts below the top of the areola... which was visible at the time to the public," according to the criminal complaint filed in Everett Municipal Court).
I caught three of the hearings this morning, in a low-ceilinged courtroom packed with defendants and attorneys from an assortment of cases, all making small talk with one-another and a handful of reporters while waiting for their turn before the judge. The presiding judge looked like a retired walrus.
“I don’t want to fucking be on the news,” one defendant said as she walked into the courtroom and saw a news camera.
Defendant Dana Fitzpatrick, hung back in the crowd, near the door, wearing jeans with horseshoe decals on the pockets and pink platform pumps, nervously twisting her hair and avoiding eye contact while her lawyer, Brian Ashbach, asked the judge for a bench trial in early March (a judge-only trial at which time they would hopefully reach an agreement with the city).
Shortly after Fitzpatrick's attorney spoke to the judge, Sullivan stepped up and asked for motions to dismiss his client’s charges—arguing what she did wasn’t a sex act—and set another confirmation hearing for late March. Evenson was a slight woman in a black suit, her hair carefully curled, who hovered near the door of the courtroom as if waiting for her chance to escape.
“She’s not pleading to anything,” Sullivan told me after the hearing. The city of Everett has charged all five girls with prostitution even though there was no sex, no offers for sex, and no physical contact between the women and customers.
But this case isn't entirely about prosecuting these women. A source close to the case says the city is laying pressure on the women as leverage to testify against Bill Wheeler, owner of four Grab n Go Espresso stands in Snohomish County. The city made an offer to each woman: In lieu of pleading guilty to her charges and facing 30 days in jail and an HIV test (the HIV mandate was later dropped, assumedly because it was insulting and ridiculous), she could fully cooperate with the police investigations and incur a 24-month stay—meaning that after 24 months of good behavior, all charges would be dismissed—that is, unless they received further criminal law violations or refused to testify against Wheeler.
Leloni Michelle Bailey, another defendant, also refused to plead guilty to the charges against her or cooperate with the city. Her case is set for trial in March.
The city is definitely coming down hard on the women. Prostitution charges are usually accompanied by one or two days in jail, not 30, sources close to the case say.
I asked Ashbach his thoughts on the released photographs of the women—photographs that essentially turned risqué baristas into unwilling life-long porn stars (Here are the never-to-disappear from the internet, totally NSFW!!!! pictures and the city of Everett into a producer of smut.
Ashbach, who fought against the photos’ release, says the decision to release them probably followed case law accurately, but didn’t account for the women’s individual rights. “The problem is the Washington public records act is so expansive, it doesn’t take into consideration when individual rights and privacy can be damaged—perhaps irreparably,” he says. “The city trading in nudity is upsetting, and the idea that anyone can look these photos up forever, online, is upsetting.”
4
Or better yet, charge them with treason or attempted murder, ya know, to set an example for all the other would-be petty tyrants.
Either way, these girls are stupid. For one, they should have never let anyone take pictures of them doing these things and secondly as an ex-barista I gotta say...girls, you can make a lot more money working at a strip club doing the exact same thing and you won't even burn your vag on the hot water for the americano's...amirite? baristas holla!
yeah...
7
8
Is this different from Valentine's Day gifts?
(ducks)
10
11
@10 has it exactly right. It wasn't quite prostitution but it was definitely illegal. And, @6 has a great point (actually we didn't ALL miss it, Will).
12
13
14
15
And 11, 15, "unwilling porn stars" sounds accurate to me. These women agreed to take off their clothes and have their pictures taken by random customers, which certainly carries a risk of having those photos turn up online at some point. But there are billions of nudie photos on the internets and the odds of these photos turning up and being traced back to these women and seen by all their friends and neighbors are relatively slim. Having the photos released by the government in connection with a legal battle that's getting a lot of local media attention means that the photos are now being seen by everyone in their community, with their names and identities attached. It`s not an anonymous vulva, it's a picture of Leloni Michelle Bailey or Dana Fitzpatrick or whoever`s vulva, and that`s a lot more intrusive than what these women thought they were signing up for.
20
Boo Fuckin' Hoo! I'm sorry but I just can't seem to summon up a misty-eyed response for these poor little vag-lickin' espresso ho's. I pity their stupidity (which is proportional to their youth), but that's about it. How could you do the things these girls did, in public, for pay, in front of men with cameras, and then turn around and claim you're being victimized because you didn't think anyone would see the pictures?? Come on...
22
24
27
I am assuming that by "assumedly" you meant assumably.
Sorry. I couldn't get it out of my head for the whole article, sadly.
28
@20- Have you NO idea what it's like to be a woman in this society? Shit, if you are a woman, you're dumb as fuck. Our self worth is built up by men and the standards they place on us.
For you to fail to see the complexities in this particular scenario is disgusting. As is the way you refer to these women--"Vag-lickin' espresso ho's"? Really, dude?
Here in Seattle we like our titties and lattes; the problem at this stand is the girls were really pretty skanky and should not have been allowed to touch anything without getting shots.
I can't help it if you're a fugly feminist, maybe if Seattle womyn weren't so god damn ugly they wouldn't find the need to be such angry feminists? I've never met an attractive feminist that's for sure.
30
And that means they too, could become UNWILLING pr0n stars! Like NOW they're not just women who flash and lick for money in front of windows where men in cars watch -- now these pictures are transforming them into some kind of "sex workers"! Bet they never saw that coming.
Time magazine should write a cover story about these computers and telephonic cameras and Inter-Nets. It's changing things, says I.
Maybe not into a shot glass, but into their mouths, I'm sure they had plenty of experience.
If these women were acting with pride and self-possession, and perhaps a bit of respect for everyone who doesn't want to share in the male-driven fantasies they're enacting, I think I would feel differently.
34
and...@29- If by fugly feminist you mean short-haired, brown-skinned dyke, then ya, that's me. But I'm pretty cool with it even though a lot of folks (such as yourself) would have me think otherwise.
35
Ah, the "objectification" trope. That phrase doesn't actually mean anything, but apparently it still provides a feminist cover for a sex negative attitude.
@34 - "act with pride and self-possession"
So strippers are by definition lacking in pride and self-possession? OK, whatever you say, judge.
Apparently that means having a stick up your ass, and not being capable of self-depreciation.
37
Advertisement
Most Commented on Slog
-
Liveblogging the Washington State House Debate and Vote
onIN FAVOR OF GAY MARRIAGE by Eli Sanders -
SL Letter of the Day: Life Sentence by Dan Savage
-
Required Listening: Howard Stern on Ellen, JC Penney, Bullied Gay Kids, Rosie, Santorum, Bachmann, et al by Dan Savage
-
It's Not Over Until We Say It's Over by Dan Savage
-
Jeff Bezos' Racist, Pro-Life, Anti-Evolution, Rape-Apologist Search Engine by Goldy
-
Yesterday's Best Arguments Against Gay Marriage by Eli Sanders
-
SL Letter of the Day: Tower of Label by Dan Savage
-
Which Kind of Bus Person Are You? by Megan Seling
-
Santorum Wins Colorado by Paul Constant
-
"Let me be the first one to say: My business will refuse to participate in a same-sex marriage ceremony," by Republican Representative Matt Shea of the Spokane Valley by Eli Sanders
RSS
Facebook
Twitter
Comments (38) RSS