Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Monday, February 8, 2010

Judge Grants Reprieve to STITA Taxi

Posted by on Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 6:40 PM

You may have been following the battle between STITA taxi, which has bought exclusive rights to pick up fares at Sea-Tac Airport, and the Port of Seattle. In the latest round of bidding for the contract, Yellow Cab offered the port more money, nudging out STITA (which formed a nonprofit in 1989 to satisfy the port's request for an exclusive cab company at the airport). In response to losing the bid, STITA, claiming the bidding process was illegal and would impair the local taxi industry, sued the port last week (the lawsuit is in this .pdf). Losing the contract would likely destroy the company, the company says, thereby putting the 450 drivers out of work.

Earlier today, STITA looked defeated when King County Superior Court Judge Steven Gonzalez denied a request for a restraining order. But STITA appealed to a state court, which granted a stay, thereby preventing the port from signing a contract with Yellow Cab until the parties resolve their issues.

A statement from STITA is after the jump.

The Port of Seattle will not be able to sign a contract with Yellow Cab, after a State Court of Appeals Commissioner issued a stay late Monday.

Earlier Monday, a King County Judge denied a restraining order filed by the Seattle-Tacoma International Taxi Association (STITA) to block the Port from signing the contract.

The contract for on-demand taxi service at Sea-Tac airport won’t be awarded until the court determines if the Port acted illegally. King County Superior Court Judge Steven Gonzalez heard STITA’s case on Feb. 4, and issued his decision this afternoon.

STITA vowed to continue fighting. They immediately took the case to the State Court of Appeals, which agreed to issue a stay — meaning the Port cannot sign with Yellow Cab until the legal issues are resolved.

The commissioner is expected to consider the merits of the case this week.

“We’re thrilled with this late-breaking win,” said Jesse Buttar, STITA cab owner. “We know we have a case. We just want a fair shot at the airport contract.”

On Jan. 29, STITA filed a complaint asking the court to halt the Port from signing a contract that violates state law. STITA seeks a fair and legal proposal process in which all bidders can compete on a level playing field.

In 1989, STITA — a non-profit co-op with the greenest cab fleet in the country — was created by the Port of Seattle to exclusively serve the airport and provide reliable service to airport users. Now, after an unfair proposal process, STITA and its approximately 450 members and drivers will essentially be put out of business.

In its lawsuit, STITA contends the Port’s bidding process violated the state Airports Act because the Port discontinued its prior practice of charging fees to taxicabs based on the airport’s actual cost of services provided to the cabbies. Instead, it required bidders to commit to pay an unfair concession fee of at least 10 percent of their airport-based revenues. This violates the Airports Act, which says airport concession fees must be based upon the Airport’s actual cost of operations and be reasonable and uniform.

STITA contends the Port’s bidding process caused a predatory bidding war among taxi companies which not only was illegal but will be financially devastating to the King County taxi industry.

STITA’s lawsuit also contends that the Port’s new concession fee violates the King County Code, which requires the King County Council to set the taxi meter rate at a level that is “just and reasonable.” The Port’s new concession fee cuts directly into the county’s taxi meter rate and prevents cab operators from receiving the gross receipts that they legally are entitled to receive.

Despite notice from STITA protesting these glaring problems with the process and proposed contract, the Port of Seattle declined to re-do its flawed proposal and said it would sign an agreement with Yellow Cab. STITA had no recourse but legal action.T

 

Comments (26) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
When I first moved to Washington a couple of years ago, I was stunned that for all of the environmentally-friendly reputation of the area, there were two types of cab companies: those that pick up at the airport and those that drop off, and that every taxi is empty going one direction.

Now, there's transit and walking and bicycling, but there are some times (and some people) which require cabs. To intentionally double the carbon footprint of airport travelers is just insane.

And now STITA says it's about jobs? Sure, we could get even more people employed if the county paid for totally empty cabs to drive around, never picking anyone up. It would make about as much sense as the current arrangement.
Posted by also on February 8, 2010 at 6:54 PM
Free Lunch 2
They need to drop this contract all together, rather than give it to Yellow or anyone else. Any cab that drops someone from the airport should be allowed to pick someone else up.

Right now almost all STITA cabs arrive at the airport empty, and all others cabs are required to leave empty.

What, will passengers leaving SeaTac be baffled by different colored taxis? What is the the logic behind this contract (aside from paying off the port)?
Posted by Free Lunch on February 8, 2010 at 7:06 PM
3
I took a STITA when I returned from New York.

I noticed the cab ran on natural gas (there was a slim cylinder in the trunk).

That alone makes me like them.
Posted by Birdie Num-Nums on February 8, 2010 at 7:31 PM
Karlheinz Arschbomber 4
The rules for Seattle taxis, especially the STITAs are:
1) complete ignorance of where anything is, you'd better know the way
2) an extremely informal relationship with English as a spoken language

Here in Hamburg there's also a 'STITA'-ish situation.

The cabs you get in the city are incredibly good, the cabbies know every random alley.
The 'STITA'-equivalents are just like the ones at SEATAC, useless.
Posted by Karlheinz Arschbomber http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arschbombe on February 8, 2010 at 7:32 PM
Westlake, son! 5
STITA is a non-profit? Fuck that why does it cost just as much then!

And those 450 drivers won't be out of a job, they'll just start taking regular fares with the only restriction that they have to roll back to the airport to fill up the natural gas at the end of the day.
Posted by Westlake, son! on February 8, 2010 at 7:58 PM
6
Excellent reporting! I have wondered hard about the airport taxi situation for ages and frequently, and only ever learned anything about it from The Stranger.

On the personnel front, some nice Sikhs driving Seatac -> Seattle on major holidays, pleasure to meet them so thank you to that HR department. Fun guys to talk to, especially about long hair, and never as resentful as I am to be underway at Christmas.

@4: Yeah on 1), no on 2). Over and over, the most educated interesting people I've met in Seattle are the immigrant taxi drivers. They've all been around the world (ay ay ay ay), traveled in other words, speak multiple languages, and usually, especially the Horn of Africa guys, are more university educated than I am.
Posted by Amelia on February 8, 2010 at 8:36 PM
Cascadian Bacon 7
Here is an idea. Instead on giving a cab company a juicy government contract, different companies can compete for business by picking people up from the airport after they drop people off at the airport. OMG free market competition. Why is this even an issue?
Posted by Cascadian Bacon on February 8, 2010 at 8:36 PM
8
@Westlake And those 450 drivers won't be out of a job, they'll just start taking regular fares with

Actually they can't. Most of them never bothered to get licenses that give them rights to pick up paying customers in Seattle (see some articles in the Seattle times). Why bother when you are guaranteed a pick up at the airport? I think the reason Yellow Cab can afford to pay more money to the port is because they'll be carrying fares in both directions.
Posted by ChrisPr on February 8, 2010 at 9:03 PM
9
I wish everyone who thinks they know the taxi buisness would come drive a cab for a week. It isn't about picking up and dropping off at the airport it is about making a living. It is about serving the people who relay on cabs for transportation. Not everyone can have a great salary job with benefits, some like a cab driver are self employed and pay all their own taxes and health care if they are able ato find the money for it. Before you put down a cab driver just think if there were not any cabs.
Posted by CD Patty on February 8, 2010 at 9:19 PM
Fnarf 10
@1, @2, @7: you are apparently ignorant of how taxis work and are licensed. And you are apparently under the delusion that only residents of the city of Seattle use the airport. MOST passengers to and from the airport are not going from or to Seattle.

If you allow any taxi that drops off at the airport to pick up any passenger, you're immediately going to be faced with the passenger who wants to go to Renton getting into a Shoreline cab, or a passenger who wants to go to Tacoma getting into a Seattle cab. That ain't going to work.

Cabs are licensed by cities. How are you going to manage that? You can't. You have to have a dedicated taxi licensor for the airport.
Posted by Fnarf http://www.facebook.com/fnarf on February 8, 2010 at 9:31 PM
11
@10: Yes, I am ignorant. Tell me again how it does some good to have a cab pick a fare up in Shoreline, drive to the airport, and be legally prohibited from taking a passenger back from the airport to Shoreline or downtown or wherever?

Also, can you explain whether this problem is unique to metrpoloises like Seattle, or whether it also affects podunk towns like Los Angeles, New York, San Francisco, and Boston... where any cab company can pick up at the airport (with some registration and fee requirements)?

I'm willing to learn why we in Seattle have it all figured out, with every taxi empty in one direction, and why that's better than, oh, pretty much everywhere else in the world. Enlighten me?
Posted by also on February 8, 2010 at 10:06 PM
Tiffany 12
$40 to get from Sea-Tac to Capitol Hill
$15 to get from SFO to central SF

that's my experience
Posted by Tiffany http://www.facebook.com/tiffany98122 on February 8, 2010 at 10:11 PM
13
Sorry Tiffany, unless something changed in the last 18 months you're delusional. 35ish plus tip plus $2 surcharge is about standard from SFO to Financial District.

Posted by capicola on February 8, 2010 at 10:37 PM
14
Sorry Tiffany, unless something changed drastically in the last 18 months you're delusional. 35ish plus tip plus $2 surcharge is about standard from SFO to Financial District.

Posted by capicola on February 8, 2010 at 10:37 PM
Fnarf 15
@11, he's not going to get a fare to Shoreline, unless they set up separate ranks for each of the seventy towns in the area. And then, you'd end up with two Shoreline cabs sitting there waiting, while twenty Seattle passengers lined up.

In New York, Boston, Chicago and LA, the airport is IN the city. Makes all the difference in the world. Our region is extremely fragmented. One solution might be to institute a county-wide licensing bureau, but even then you've got Pierce to consider. There's no way in hell Seattle's going to let Tacoma cabs wander their streets for fares.

Note also that Seattle is different from a number of other big cities in that until very recently it was ILLEGAL for a cab to pick a fare up off the street. Taxi regs are Byzantine in every city in the world; Seattle's no exeption.
Posted by Fnarf http://www.facebook.com/fnarf on February 8, 2010 at 11:02 PM
16
@7 - There is no competition. Rates charged are set by King County.

And it would be hilarious to see 'competition' in a confined space like SeaTac... One of the main advantages of having a contract is limiting the enormous backups/lines that exist at airports like O'Hare. Those drivers wait in line for hours for a fare. On balance, not very efficient either.
Posted by Action Slacks on February 9, 2010 at 12:12 AM
17
It would be cool if they gave the taxi contract to Sound Transit so they could run a fricking light rail train within a 10 minute walk of the airport, and run late enough to actually pick up people in the evening. Our airport is really pathetic. I'm tempted to take the Amtrak to PDX the next time I need to fly - it actually wouldn't take much more time.
Posted by Taxi schmaxi on February 9, 2010 at 2:06 AM
Fnarf 18
Light rail is great, but realistically only about 0.1% of the population that uses Seatac lives anywhere near one of the stops. Still must have taxis. Every airport in the world has them.
Posted by Fnarf http://www.facebook.com/fnarf on February 9, 2010 at 5:46 AM
Max Solomon 19
@17: try Kenmore Air out of Boeing Field to PDX. you'll never want to go to SeaTac again.
Posted by Max Solomon on February 9, 2010 at 9:14 AM
20
I've traveled through New York a bunch and hadn't noticed any airports i the city per se. LaGuardia is in Queens, JFK is in Long Island, and Newark is in New Jersey. Taxi cabs seem to come in many different options at all of those airports. Wonder what makes that work.
Posted by mattro2.0 on February 9, 2010 at 9:23 AM
21
"in" the city
Posted by mattro2.0 on February 9, 2010 at 9:29 AM
22
#18, They can tear down the Seatac light rail station and put a taxi stand there. Nobody will mind taking a long afternoon stroll past a giant parking lot down some unmarked paths to check if taxis are running after a long flight, right?

Correction: I think, technically, the Seatac light rail station is outside the borders of Seatac proper. The official name might be the Unincorporated King County Light Rail Station or maybe the West Idaho Light Rail Station.
Posted by Taxi Schmaxi on February 9, 2010 at 9:36 AM
Free Lunch 23
Fnarf - Where is this mythical airport in NYC? JFK is as far from Manhattan as Seatac is from Tacoma. And La Guardia to Manhattan is about the same distance as SEA -> Seattle.

So if Yellow Cab gets the contract, they'll assign a special fleet to serve the airport? That doesn't seem likely. More likely they'll have a dispatcher there, organizing who goes where. Some Seattle drivers will sometimes get stuck dead-heading to Federal Way and vice versa. So what?

How is that different than a dispatcher at the airport dispatching cabs of all ilks?
Posted by Free Lunch on February 9, 2010 at 12:16 PM
24
STITA (Seattle Tacoma International Taxi Association) was formed by Port of Seattle in 1980 (something), port of Seattle asked Yellow cab (Puget Sound Dispatch) and Farwest taxi to work for Port of Seattle back then. Both Yellow and Farwest said NO to port of Seattle….that they don’t want to work for Port of Seattle. After, both companies rejected to work for port of Seattle, then port of Seattle formed its own taxi and it’s STITA…Port of Seattle did not allow STITA, to do business outside the airport, because they told STITA they are only allowed to work for Sea-Tac-International Airport. The STITA cabbies are allowed to pick up fair from airport ONLY not from anywhere else. Yellow cabbies, Farwest cabbies and Orange cabbies can pick up fair from Airport and also outside the airport too. After so many years why Port of Seattle is throwing STITA out? Why Port of Seattle did not allow STITA to do business outside the airport? STITA is part of Port of Seattle..if they screw STITA..they will screw Yellow in the long run. DO NOT TRUST PORT OF SEATTLE…THEY ARE CROOK!!!!!!
Posted by Mike Al on February 18, 2010 at 10:21 PM
25
I think what STITA is doing, is right. If STITA has been working for the airport for over 30 years and has followed the ports orders for this long, why would you want to get rid of STITA??he port is obviously doesnt care about customer service and fuel efficient cars because STITA won those rankings. From the looks of it, they have a legitimate case and hopefully they win.
Posted by Justice_speaks on February 23, 2010 at 4:35 PM
26
I think what STITA is doing, is right. If STITA has been working for the airport for over 30 years and has followed the ports orders for this long, why would you want to get rid of STITA?? The port obviously doesn't care about customer service and fuel efficient cars because STITA won those rankings. From the looks of it, they have a legitimate case and hopefully they win.
Posted by Justicetalks on February 23, 2010 at 4:37 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy