Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Monday, February 8, 2010

Haiti and the Super Bowl Triumph

Posted by on Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 1:35 PM

In the way the Haitian slave revolt played a role in the Louisiana Purchase, the recent Haitian earthquake can be seen as playing a role in this:

NEW YORK — The Super Bowl was watched by more than 106 million people, surpassing the 1983 finale of "M-A-S-H" to become the most-watched program in television history.

The Nielsen Co. estimated Monday that 106.5 million people watched the New Orleans Saints upset the Indianapolis Colts. That beats the "M-A-S-H" finale, which had 105.97 million viewers in an era when there were fewer television sets.

The Haitian catastrophe cannot be separated from the one that happened in New Orleans. The two are linked for the rest of history. And we can see in the order of those natural disasters the reverse of the terrorist actions that link Nairobi to New York City. Where as one begins in the presidency before Bush (and has its end as a defining moment in the Bush years), the other ends in the presidency after Bush (and has its beginning as a defining moment in the Bush years). Nairobi is the entrance; Haiti is the exit.


And this is middle:

Picture_11.png

 

Comments (37) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
Ok.
Posted by g on February 8, 2010 at 1:38 PM
Fnarf 2
Yes, well, you -- wait, what? Haiti and the Super Bowl? Because both places had catastrophes in the past five years? Um, how does that work again?
Posted by Fnarf http://www.facebook.com/fnarf on February 8, 2010 at 1:49 PM
nixor 3
can maybe he have his own little blog? off to the side somewhere?
Posted by nixor on February 8, 2010 at 1:52 PM
4
Because of the costs of putting down the efforts of enslaved persons in st. domingue to have freedom, France sold off an asset called Louisiana. (Actually, it was held by Spain but France had control over spain its ally at the time....so spain quitclaimed it back to France to be sold to the USA).
That's a link.

And if you want more there's tons and tons more Haiti-New Orleans links, like:

--30,000 people fleeing Haiti who went to NOLA
-- that whole free people of color thing, and
-- (yup!) voo doo.

But that doesn't mean Haiti now is linked to something called Louisiana now.

Or that an earthquake is linked to a superbowl.

But hey selling a little mumbo jumbo gris gris bullshit to whitey never hurt anybody did it?
Posted by John the Konkeroo on February 8, 2010 at 1:53 PM
Loveschild 5
Wow!
Posted by Loveschild http://www.samaritanspurse.org/index.php/articles/responding_to_haiti_earthquake/ on February 8, 2010 at 1:53 PM
6
I always bristle slightly at Charles' non-negotiable language "can not" (or "cannot", I think he meant), etc. And here I thought these were opinions he was throwin' around!
Posted by g on February 8, 2010 at 1:56 PM
Fifty-Two-Eighty 7
How do I get my hands on some of those drugs you're doing?
Posted by Fifty-Two-Eighty http://www.nra.org on February 8, 2010 at 1:56 PM
Will in Seattle 8
Obviously we need to annex Haiti. Every time we help them, we always end up hurting them.

Well, except for the cheap Haitian Superbowl knock off t-shirts ... those should sell like hotcakes.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on February 8, 2010 at 2:04 PM
Posted by STJA on February 8, 2010 at 2:05 PM
nixor 10
@6, I absolutely agree. he makes these seemingly arbitrary connections, and then then takes the stance that his tenuously supported observations would be self-evident to any intelligent reader.

bristle bristle
Posted by nixor on February 8, 2010 at 2:11 PM
Fnarf 11
@4, yes, I understand the connection between the Haitian revolution and New Orleans. Where I got lost was on the way to the Super Bowl 200 years later.
Posted by Fnarf http://www.facebook.com/fnarf on February 8, 2010 at 2:13 PM
raindrop 12
Isn't there a copy editor at The Stranger? I'd be able to parse Charles's twisted logic much easier if his writing was cleaned up a bit.
Posted by raindrop on February 8, 2010 at 2:13 PM
13
@11
D'accord.

He went back and changed it to add more mumbo jumbo re: terrorism.

and throwing out a bushbaby, that always is a good distraction.

his connections usually are about as valid as the GWB saddam-9-11 "linkage"...
Posted by M. Laveau on February 8, 2010 at 2:24 PM
lark 14
Charles,
You lost me partner. The only similarity between Haiti and New Orleans is that both (one a country and the other a US city) experienced a horrible natural diaster (the former by an earthquake and the latter by a hurricane). As far Nairobi and Haiti there is no connection whatsoever. The terrible events from Nairobi/Dar es Salaam through the attempt to down an airliner near Detroit recently are either acts of terror or attempted acts of terror. All are tragic. Both natural diasters and acts of terror occur under any administration. These just happen to occur under the three most recent administrations (Clinton/Bush/Obama). And, I believe none of these have anything to do with the Super Bowl. What I think is charming about the Super Bowl victory of New Orleans is that it shows the city is "recovering" (My present tense emphasis) in some capacity.

Granted, one can decline to participate (read not watch the SB) in the rapacious commercialism that the Super Bowl represents. And in addition, one doesn't have to watch a fine American football game, at least this year. But, heck let the people of New Orleans celebrate. They haven't had much to celebrate about recently. Laissez les bons temps rouler!
Posted by lark on February 8, 2010 at 2:24 PM
Cato the Younger Younger 15
Obviously what happened in Haiti, New Orleans and the Holocaust are also all directly related. And it is best to view in light of the destruction of Vulcan in the last Star Trek movie.

Oh, we should consider the executions that Mary I of England carried out as well. It helps to add perspective to all of it.

*sigh*
Posted by Cato the Younger Younger on February 8, 2010 at 2:40 PM
Fifty-Two-Eighty 16
Don't forget the Chinese, Cato. It's really all their fault.
Posted by Fifty-Two-Eighty http://www.nra.org on February 8, 2010 at 2:45 PM
17
And the argument falls apart completely: the Haitian devastation was the result of a natural disaster, the New Orleans devastation the result of faulty levees built and maintained by the US Army Corps of Engineers - which is why Spike Lee called his documentary 'When the Levees Broke.'

Katrina largely spared New Orleans and took out the Mississippi Gulf Coast, which was the victim of a natural disaster. What happened in New Orleans was a man-made disaster.

Here's a link to the Associated Press story in which a US District Court judge found the federal government responsible for the inundation:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34028940/
Posted by Jereboam on February 8, 2010 at 2:46 PM
jimmy 18
@12 Amen. This made no sense. Charles, if the point you're making is that George W. Bush was an all around disaster, I can get on board.
Posted by jimmy http://www.mybigfatlazyblog.blogspot.com on February 8, 2010 at 2:49 PM
Fnarf 19
@17, to be fair, the real man-made disaster wasn't the levees, it was the hundred-year project to channel and contain the Mississippi and Atchafalaya Rivers. If it wasn't for the US Army Corps of Engineers, there wouldn't be a city at New Orleans in the first place; it would either be underwater, or 100 miles away from the water, depending on what the "natural" river decided to do. There's nothing remotely natural about the river now. The city that's there now bears little relation to the one that was there 200 years ago, what with the loss of silt, the collapsing soil, and a hundred other factors. Every forty years there's a devastating flood there, and each time it's worse. That will always be true. Better levees would help, but ultimately you can't be safe in a city that's below sea level, dropping all the time, and adjacent to the most powerful moving body of water on the planet.
Posted by Fnarf http://www.facebook.com/fnarf on February 8, 2010 at 2:57 PM
20
I'm pretty sure the 200 year old buildings I've stayed in in New Orleans are the same buildings built 200 years ago.

I'm also pretty sure there will always be a New Orleans at the same spot in one form or another.
Posted by six shooter on February 8, 2010 at 3:12 PM
21
Haiti is also a man-made disaster.

When earthquakes hit rich cities built with first-class materials up to well-regulated standards, they don't cause nearly as much damage as when they hit poor cities in poor countries run by corrupt governments with no standards.

Same goes for hurricanes, I suppose.
Posted by six shooter on February 8, 2010 at 3:16 PM
Fnarf 22
Please read up on the history of the Mississippi channel -- I suggest you start with the pertinent chapter in "The Control of Nature" by John McPhee -- and then tell me how relevant one 200-year-old building is. The Corps is the only reason the Mississippi runs in the channel it runs in. 200 years ago "New Orleans" occupied something like 1/5 the land that the current city occupies. And the ground is sinking at a rate of up to an inch a year. The areas where those 200-year-old buildings are located is only sinking a quarter of an inch a year -- that's FOUR FEET since it was built. Many areas of the city are basically at the water table already; if you take a shovelful out of your yard, water fills the hole. Levees aren't going to fix that. Note that the levees themselves are sinking too.

Lower Louisiana is an ecological catastrophe zone that has nothing to do with Katrina. Katrina made a lot of geologists' fears visible, and exposed a lot of the problems, political more than technological, but it didn't cause them.
Posted by Fnarf http://www.facebook.com/fnarf on February 8, 2010 at 3:27 PM
Loveschild 23
A real triumph, a miracle that exemplifies the resilience of the Hatian people:

www.cnn.com/2010/WORLD/americas/02/08/ha…;
Posted by Loveschild http://www.samaritanspurse.org/index.php/articles/responding_to_haiti_earthquake/ on February 8, 2010 at 3:42 PM
Fnarf 24
See this NG article from a year BEFORE Katrina, which pretty much predicted it: http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/ngm/04…

and

http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/2007/0…

Quote: "dams, levees, and other flood protections may actually increase flood losses because they spur new development in the floodplain". The levees were "a development scheme".
Posted by Fnarf http://www.facebook.com/fnarf on February 8, 2010 at 3:42 PM
Loveschild 25
A real Haitian triumph, a miracle that exemplifies the resilience of the Hatian people:

http://www.cnn.com/2010/WORLD/americas/0…
Posted by Loveschild http://www.samaritanspurse.org/index.php/articles/responding_to_haiti_earthquake/ on February 8, 2010 at 3:43 PM
26
Lower Louisiana is an ecological catastrophe zone that has nothing to do with Katrina. Katrina made a lot of geologists' fears visible, and exposed a lot of the problems, political more than technological, but it didn't cause them.


Agreed.

Also agreed that the city pre-Katrina was way too large, was built in a stupid way on land that should never have supported structures, and was run by gangsters too stupid to steal.

So long as we move stuff across the Gulf and up and down the river, there will be a city in one form or another pretty much where New Orleans is now.

If the Italians can do it, if the Dutch can do it, we can do it.

Until Katrina, the Army Corp of Engineers were heroes. This is a story more about political corruption and poor planning than engineering failures.

-- What's going on with the world, btw? You and Will agree on more and more. Until last week, I don't think I ever disagreed with anything you wrote. Strange.
Posted by six shooter on February 8, 2010 at 3:44 PM
Fnarf 27
Where do I agree with Will?

The Dutch and Italians are not dealing with the world's largest delta system. Nor are they dealing with subsistence caused by such a combination of factors -- oil and gas removal, loss of silt. And the Italians, if you are referring to Venice, are losing the battle; Venice will be underwater in a decade or two. The main plaza is already flooded about half the time. If they want to survive they're going to have adapt to the upper floors.
Posted by Fnarf http://www.facebook.com/fnarf on February 8, 2010 at 4:02 PM
Fifty-Two-Eighty 28
Don't ever accuse Fnarf of agreeing with Will. That's just guaranteed to piss him off. (Me too, FWIW.)
Posted by Fifty-Two-Eighty http://www.nra.org on February 8, 2010 at 4:21 PM
29
Another thread. Lesbians and DADT.

Then there was another thread on DADT where you and he agreed that thousands and thousands of women are raped or sexually assaulted every day.
Posted by six shooter on February 8, 2010 at 4:24 PM
30
Blind squirrel, meet acorn - Will @17 actually made a true statement. Lesbians are far more likely to be kicked out of the armed forces under DADT than gay men.


http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archive…

Maybe agree is too strong a word.
Posted by six shooter on February 8, 2010 at 4:27 PM
Fnarf 31
@30, note that my post there included a link to a new article that backed up my claim. Unlike some other posts I could mention.
Posted by Fnarf http://www.facebook.com/fnarf on February 8, 2010 at 4:58 PM
32
Fnarf is right, we better warn folks in other cities about their folly in locating in places where disaster might strike!

they will certainly appreciate our superior wisdom, and helpful hints to just move the location of their city!
Posted by Pre-Big One Smugness on February 8, 2010 at 5:17 PM
33
Is Slog just a long-standing competition between you guys to see who can post the most dumbshit thing for the day?

Yes, this Super Bowl beat MASH in the ratings because one of the teams is from Norleans which has a hurricane several years ago and Haiti recently had an earthquake.
Posted by humanoutpost http://www.humanoutpost.blogspot.com on February 8, 2010 at 5:29 PM
34
@33, in all fairness, Charles has some pretty steeply retarded competition in Lindy and Kelly
Posted by in all fairness on February 8, 2010 at 5:45 PM
Fnarf 35
@32, I am sorry that you cannot read.
Posted by Fnarf http://www.facebook.com/fnarf on February 8, 2010 at 9:36 PM
36
a a actions after and and and are as as as be before beginning begins bush bush bush bush can cannot catastrophe city defining defining disasters end ends entrance; exit for from haiti haitian happened has has history in in in in in in is is its its link linked moment moment nairobi nairobi natural new new of of of one one order orleans other presidency presidency rest reverse see separated terrorist that that the the the the the the the the the the the the the the those to two we where years years york

That long paragraph -- I recognize all those words, but they make absolutely no sense in the order you put them. As an attempt to help, I've alphabetized them for you! Good luck with that.
Posted by Cow on February 8, 2010 at 9:39 PM
doesurmindglow 37
@35:

Haha that was awesome.
Posted by doesurmindglow on February 9, 2010 at 1:58 AM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy