Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Friday, February 5, 2010

Overdose Prevention Bill Passes State Senate

Posted by on Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 11:15 AM

A bill that would provide legal immunity for people who call 911 to help someone overdosed on illegal drugs just passed the state senate, with only one dissenting vote, from Sen. Mike Carrell (R-28). The bill now goes to the state house of representatives.

Sponsored by state senator Rosa Franklin (D-29), ESB 5516 says, "A person acting in good faith who seeks medical assistance for someone experiencing a drug-related overdose shall not be charged or prosecuted for possession of a controlled substance."

I've written about the problem in this feature about a girl who died because no one took her to the hospital:

Danielle's seizure lasted about five minutes, and after it ended she appeared to fall asleep. Other people began going to sleep in various rooms of the house. Some members of the group said they woke up at 6:30 a.m., but others claimed it wasn't until 8:30 a.m. that Ryan Mills started dinging a cowbell to wake the group. Danielle looked terrible. Her face was cold to the touch; her lips were blue. So, once again, the group had to make a decision. They could call 911, they could drive Danielle to the hospital, or they could take matters into their own hands.

Bills of this sort have been introduced for years in Washington state but stalled every time—burdened by the typical controversy surrounding any measure to decrease penalties for possessing illegal drugs—often failing to even make it out of committee. But support has snowballed in recent years as a life-saving measure, particularly given a spiking rate of opiate overdoses (.pdf).

This bill also expands access to naloxone, an opiate antagonist that reverses overdoses from opiates.

 

Comments (9) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
shuvoff 1
Where's the best site to find out if my state senator voted for or against this bill so I can either thank them or berate them?
Posted by shuvoff on February 5, 2010 at 11:24 AM
boxofbirds 2
Wow, reasonable legislative progress. Who knew?
Posted by boxofbirds on February 5, 2010 at 11:24 AM
3
Giving potheads and dope fiends a free pass from prosecution is a bad idea. We should be prosecuting all those that denied this person medical attention. This is similar to the victim that was beaten so badly and thrown in ditch to die. He died over a day later but not before the family of the suspect visited him several times and laughed at his plight dying in the ditch. But the family had committed no crime.
All these people in the house should be put away for life. At this point I will celebrate if their dope addiction makes them succumb to a similar fate as this girl.
Posted by everyone is a victim on February 5, 2010 at 11:30 AM
Dee 4
This is a great step in the right direction.

@3 - I debated whether to respond or not, because clearly your anti-drug view is set in stone. But, I just wanted to say that the comparison of cases makes no sense. Taking drugs is phenomenally dissimilar from physical violence against others. The lack of prosecution in your example seems to be a result of the U.S. not having any real binding laws regarding a 'duty to rescue', unlike Canada and Europe. By contrast, this law will certainly help save lives.
Posted by Dee on February 5, 2010 at 12:35 PM
5
#3, you are a surprisingly callous and incoherent asshole. No one should have to face arrest and prosecution as a result of trying to help someone experiencing an overdose. This bill is a courageous step towards sensible drug policy. I worked at Harborview emergency room and have seen unconscious people literally thrown out of cars onto the sidewalk for te ER staff to deal with because the people who brought them knew that they'd be arrested. This makes the trauma doc's job extremely difficult: Knowing what drugs have been taken and when they have been consumed makes selecting the proper course of treatment a *lot* easier. Kudos to Franklin for sponsoring this bill, and shame on Carrell for his dissent.
Posted by Harm Reduction Works on February 5, 2010 at 12:37 PM
shuvoff 6
#3,

The point of this legislation is to prevent such events & deaths from happening by giving people an incentive to seek medical help BEFORE a death occurs. If they fear prosecution, people are less likely to call 911 when emergencies happen.

This law also makes life-saving drugs available to be administered by those nearby before EMTs arrive, increasing their effectiveness (and the odds of survival.)

When you find the magic unicorn that takes drug use and abuse away from the human condition, let me know. Until then, I support programs and policies which will help PREVENT NEEDLESS SUFFERING AND DEATH.

Unlike you, who wishes deaths to remain at their current levels from overdose (2nd only behind MVA accidents in the USA, and #1 cause of death in WA state) to justify ever increasing prison populations and their associated costs to government and society.

That’s right. You want people to be afraid to call for help so they hesitate, and then you hope that when they finally do call it’s too late so the overdose victim dies, and then they can be charged with murder for being involved in obtaining the drug.

Sado-moralism is not a convincing argument against a law which can prevent death.

They say that karma is a bitch. I hope so.
Posted by shuvoff on February 5, 2010 at 12:53 PM
7
People need to realize that if they smoke pot they may O.D. and die and there will be no immunity from prosecution for their callous and dangerous behavior. Too many people are under illusion that pot is safer than crack and heroin. Those lies are killing our children.
Posted by everyone is a victim on February 5, 2010 at 3:04 PM
NaFun 8
No one has ever died from a marijuana overdose, dipshit.
Posted by NaFun http://www.dancesafe.org on February 5, 2010 at 5:15 PM
Free Lunch 9
Back when cocaine was part of our routine, a friend of mine suddenly experienced a heart rate well over 250bpm. I took him to a hospital and told the doctors what was up. No cops were called.

Are doctors supposed to call the police in this situation, or is more the fear of such a repercussion that this law is designed to dissuade?
Posted by Free Lunch on February 5, 2010 at 5:40 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy