Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Thursday, February 4, 2010

If You're Only Going to Read One Scandalous Political Book This Year...

Posted by on Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 11:32 AM

John_Edwards_The_Politician_25.jpg
The Politician, Andrew Young's tell-all book about working for John Edwards from 1998 to 2008, was released last Saturday. Young, of course, made headlines as the fall guy during the Rielle Hunter/John Edwards sex scandal, going so far as to lie about being the father of Edwards's love child. I read The Politician in two big gulps, and I'm here to tell you: Don't bother with this one. All the nastiest truths of working for John Edwards—that he blamed aides for allowing him to have an affair with Hunter, that he became more and more arrogant as he got closer and closer to the presidency, that he obsessed over his hair—have already made the headlines. There are only a few anecdotes in the book that haven't already been mined and sprayed all over the news. All you get out of reading The Politician is an overlong trip through Young's mind. Young, frankly, is not that smart and comes across as a highly unreliable narrator.

amd_game_change.jpg
If you're in the mood for sleazy political writing, I'd instead recommend that you take a look at John Heilemann and Mark Halperin's Game Change, which came out last month. Edwards only appears in Game Change several times, but those appearances basically sum up the entirety of The Politician: He goes from a smarmy politician with airs to a deluded, powerless freak in a few short months. Game Change tracks the Democratic primaries and 2008 political race in their entirety, and nearly every page has some insidery bit of gossip that will have you forever doubting the integrity of any human being who decides to run for President. It's like a good V.C. Andrews novel: You can't look away from the shameful behavior, no matter how hard you try.

A few of the revelations in Game Change, especially Bill Clinton's casual racism in private conversations and his anger at being called a racist, will make you think differently about familiar politicians you thought you understood. My personal favorite quote is credited to John McCain:

"FUCK YOU! FUCK, FUCK, fuck fuck, fuck, fuck, fuck, fuck, fuck, fuck!!!"
McCain let out the stream of sharp epithets, both middle fingers raised and extended, barking in his wife's face. He was angry; she had interrupted him.

There are parts of Game Change that feel a little shaky (for instance: How do Halperin and/or Heilemann know exactly how many fucks to attribute to McCain above, let alone the three exclamation points?) but it's a fresh look at a story we all know by heart. It's thrilling in that skanky book kind of way, and it's compelling in a way that The Politician never tries to be. It's pure, dishy soap-opera fun.

 

Comments (8) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
The "Game Change" definitely looks intriguing, but I didn't know their were any good VC Andrews novels out there.
Posted by becksta on February 4, 2010 at 11:55 AM
Julie in Eugene 2
I'm reading David Plouffe's The Audacity to Win right now and finding it about 10x more fascinating than I thought it would be. It's not a scandalous political book, by any means, but it's just really interesting to get a bit of a "behind-the-scenes" look at the campaign. I'm trying really hard to take it with a big grain of salt in terms of how it portrays everyone involved (i.e., trying not to take how it portrays Obama as the gospel truth), but it's still pretty cool, at least for someone who's interested in all the geeky campaign stuff.

I will probably get around to reading Game Change this year...
Posted by Julie in Eugene on February 4, 2010 at 11:56 AM
3
Cindy McCain must have the least self-worth of anyone on the planet.
Posted by keshmeshi on February 4, 2010 at 12:12 PM
FreudianShrimp 4
"...and nearly every page has some insidery bit of gossip that will have you forever doubting the integrity of any human being who decides to run for President."

Who above the age of 10 doesn't have this quadrennial doubt?

"Insidery?" You're better than that, Paul: everyone knows "insiderish" is the proper term.
Posted by FreudianShrimp on February 4, 2010 at 12:50 PM
5
I'm sure you think its super hip to cite Bill Clinton's "casual racism," with out of context quotations and/or anecdotes, but lying about a public figure when you're reviewing a "sleazy political" book isn't necessary.

First off, I think you're referring to when Bill Clinton supposedly told my former Senator, Ted Kennedy, that Barack would be "getting coffee for us" a few years ago. Aside from the history of Starbucks enslavement of African Americans from 1776-2007, I can only imagine that you're thinking, only black Senators would be expected to get coffee for their older, white superiors.

Well, I've actually read Game Change; and I've also read Hillary Clinton's biography, A Woman in Charge (perhaps you consider this non "sleazy" political writing). In it, Carl Bernstein cites how then Junior Senator Clinton (when Barack was still in Illinois) accepted a small office, and to paraphrase, got coffee for her fellow Senators. In doing so, she garnered the political narrative of being a "work horse."

So, not only was it not sexist for a woman to get coffee for her male colleges (many of whom may have been Republicans), but it was actually politically expedient.

There are other anecdotes from the Hillary campaign, other than "coffee-gate," which I'm sure shook you to your empathetic core, with their racially racial, racial-ness. But I just want to set the record straight in regards to this one, additional, anecdote revealed by the again, "sleazy, political" book Game Change.
Posted by Slogg on February 4, 2010 at 12:53 PM
Nathaniel Irons 6
Echoing @5, does the book have any reference to Clinton's "casual racism" aside from the much-quoted coffee line?

Because in 1994, Clinton was President, Kennedy was the lion of the Senate, and Barack Obama was a college professor two years away from winning his first statewide election. Reading more into than that seems like the kind of unjustified reach that Halperin is known for.

It's exactly like Republicans jumping down Harry Reid's throat, trying to rehabilitate Trent Lott by creating the impression that Reid meant the opposite of the plainest reading of his words.
Posted by Nathaniel Irons on February 4, 2010 at 3:57 PM
7
Listening to this Andrew Young on ABC the other night, I couldn't help but think that he's very nearly as sleazy as John Edwards -- to get to know the REAL J.E. and keep serving him anyway, right to the bitter end? And then write a tell-all book for his own enrichment?

Anybody with a shred of self-respect would've bailed long before.
Posted by Citizen R on February 4, 2010 at 5:40 PM
8
If you want to know who to thank for the loss of a supermajority (or the looming loss of a House majority), start with hipster douchebags slinging casual accusations of casual racism.
Posted by RonK, Seattle on February 4, 2010 at 5:49 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy