Slog

News & Arts

Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

« Who's Seattle's Sexiest Musician? | After the Murders, the Bills »

Wednesday, February 3, 2010

Fashion Today in Six Kinds of Wrong

Posted by Paul Constant on Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 3:08 PM

It seems that Billy Ray Cyrus is not yet done unleashing awfulness on America. Slog Tipper Matt Hickey would like to dispute my Pajamajeans post yesterday. He says that this is the weirdest fashion news of the week:

Miley's 9-year-old Sister Launching a Lingerie Line for Kids

Seems like every time we hear about Noah Cyrus she's doing something totally inapropriate for her age.

Whether it's dressing like a dominatrix for Halloween, skipping around a pole-dancing pole or performing the totally un-PG hits 'Smack That' and 'Tik Tok', we suspect this nine-year-old could easily notch up more scandals than her big sis by the time she hits her teens.

The latest news that's got us scratching our heads and wondering, yet again, 'what were her parents thinking?' ...little Noah is set to become a lingerie model.

She'll be teaming up with her pint-sized best friend Emily Grace to launch a children's lingerie collection for 'Ohh! La, La! Couture'.

More, including photos and a video that seems to have been locked, can be found at ninemsn. I guess Anna Nicole Smith's attempts to make her baby "sexy" were the way of the future.

Comments (24) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment

I literally just got nauseous. That little girl is a trainwreck waiting to happen.

Posted by Mary P. Traverse

on February 3, 2010 at 3:18 PM

Uh, every child deserves a mother and Achy-Breaky Pop?

Posted by Telsa Grills on February 3, 2010 at 3:22 PM

Prostitots are the new Tweens

Posted by Barker on February 3, 2010 at 3:23 PM

Heartland family values! USA! USA! USA!

Posted by The Amazing Jim

on February 3, 2010 at 3:24 PM

That's so ridiculous it doesn't even look trashy. Just dumb. Like a bad Halloween costume or something.

Posted by Fifty-Two-Eighty

on February 3, 2010 at 3:29 PM

A pedophiles wet dream.

Posted by Bhamjason on February 3, 2010 at 3:32 PM

Pedo-bear approved!

Posted by Urgutha Forka on February 3, 2010 at 3:37 PM

o my that link is disturbing

Posted by Swearengen on February 3, 2010 at 3:42 PM

oh god i really want to barf - sick city ...

Posted by Will in Seattle

on February 3, 2010 at 3:48 PM

just threw up in my mouth a little.

Posted by singing cynic on February 3, 2010 at 4:12 PM

If you think that's hot you should see my 8yo in a thong. What?

Posted by m@tt on February 3, 2010 at 4:34 PM

So Noah is a girl's name now?

Posted by Free Lunch on February 3, 2010 at 4:39 PM

there is no line americans won't cross to make money.

Posted by Max Solomon on February 3, 2010 at 4:46 PM

She'll be pregnant by 12. Guaranteed.

Posted by laterite on February 3, 2010 at 4:47 PM

Where the fuck is Chris Hansen when you need him?

Posted by carrma on February 3, 2010 at 4:59 PM

Remember that creepy Miley/Billy Ray photoshoot from a few years back, where he was all shirtless and she was all trampy?

Yeah, that family...I wouldn't let them babysit.

Posted by dwight moody on February 3, 2010 at 5:20 PM

It's a hoax: http://dlisted.com/node/35912

Posted by whisky tango foxtrot on February 3, 2010 at 5:42 PM

@1 I think you mean you literally just became nauseated. Unless you suddenly started making other people want to throw up.

Posted by care bear on February 3, 2010 at 6:10 PM

Thanks for the rescue, @17. It's always a good idea to doublecheck the more fucked-up celeb gossips on Dlisted - Michael's a skeezy treasure.

Posted by gloomy gus on February 3, 2010 at 6:30 PM

She'll still be preggers by 12.

Posted by laterite on February 3, 2010 at 7:28 PM

Just because it's a hoax today, doesn't mean it won't be reality tomorrow.

You give someone the idea, they'll figure out a way to make it happen, guaranteed.

And based on the kids I saw over the holidays in semi-rural WalMartLand, this wouldn't be too far from reality as it is.

Which always confuses me: THESE are some of those so-called "family values" these kinds of people feel so strongly need to be protected from the big, bad gubbamint?

Posted by COMTE

on February 3, 2010 at 8:13 PM

Between this and WATCHMEN 2, today is the day for awful news.

Posted by AgentofChaos on February 3, 2010 at 11:54 PM

Why doesn't anyone demonize the one-hit piece of shit that is the father of those girls?

Posted by Telsa Grills on February 4, 2010 at 12:20 AM

God, you're a bunch of fucking puritans. Little girls like to play dress-up. They don't understand that other people might sexualize them. They dress up to look like the older women around them. Repeat after me, folks: the way they dress doesn't reflect on their morality. (Pregnant by 12?)

You all should see the way little girls in Latin America are dressed. You'd have the same reaction, except there it's a cultural norm. Get over your uptight selves.

Posted by TVDinner

on February 4, 2010 at 4:48 AM