Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Wednesday, February 3, 2010

Grooming and the Human House of Language

Posted by on Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 12:45 PM

When I came across this image...

135109281_590d60dfa2.jpg
...I recalled the amazing grooming theory by anthropologist Robin Dunbar. The theory is basically this:
Apes and monkeys, humanity's closest kin, differ from other animals in the intensity of these relationships. All their grooming is not so much about hygiene as it is about cementing bonds, making friends, and influencing fellow primates. But for early humans, grooming as a way to social success posed a problem: given their large social groups of 150 or so, our earliest ancestors would have had to spend almost half their time grooming one another—an impossible burden. What Dunbar suggests—and his research, whether in the realm of primatology or in that of gossip, confirms—is that humans developed language to serve the same purpose, but far more efficiently.
Let's turn our attention to the famous hate Heidegger had for chatter. He thought it was so pointless, such a solid waste of time, soul-crushing, and inauthentic. For the peasant of the Black Forest, a state of authenticity could only be achieved with the kind of heavy talk that confronts important truths and serious spiritual matters. But now we are beginning to see this other truth, this strong possibility: chatter is not just about chatter but also about grooming--"cementing social bonds."

[L]anguage in fact evolved in response to our need to keep up to date with friends and family. We needed conversation to stay in touch, and we still need it in ways that will not be satisfied by teleconferencing, email, or any other communication technology.
Heidegger is famous for his turn from ontology to language. The peasant of the Black Forest even claimed that "language is the house being." If only he lived long enough to see that the foundation of his mystical house might very well be this grooming business beloved by baboons.


Image by Sookie.

 

Comments (15) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
Fnarf 1
Plus he was a dirty bugger who could think you under the table. While Immanuel Kant was a real pissant who was very rarely stable.
Posted by Fnarf http://www.facebook.com/fnarf on February 3, 2010 at 12:55 PM
2
I've always hated the notion that "Great people talk about ideas. Average people talk about things. Small people talk about other people." I speculate that a great deal -- maybe most -- of human discourse is about other humans.
Posted by suomynona anonymous on February 3, 2010 at 12:56 PM
3
When I came across this image, I thought "Look at the titties on the girl in the brown shirt!" Then I realized she had her arms tucked in there and died a little on the inside.
Posted by Bohica on February 3, 2010 at 12:57 PM
Matt from Denver 4
@ 1, god bless Monty Python.
Posted by Matt from Denver on February 3, 2010 at 1:09 PM
Irena 5
Oh, but Heidegger gives me such a headache. I mean, I'm an introvert and all, but I'll take chatter any day over this:
What is spoken purely is that in which the completion of the speaking that is proper to what is spoken is, in its turn, an original.

Or:
This gathering, assembling, letting-stay is the thinging of things. The unitary fourfold of sky and earth, mortals and divinities, which is stayed in the thinging of things, we call--the world. In the naming, the things named are called into their thinging. Thinging, they unfold world, in which things abide and so are the abiding ones. By thinging, things carry out world.
Posted by Irena on February 3, 2010 at 1:21 PM
rob! 6
I've always felt that fleas, lice, bedbugs, etc. should be viewed not as disgusting pests, but as opportunities to cement social bonds.
Posted by rob! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QZBdUceCL5U on February 3, 2010 at 1:34 PM
7
Maybe language started out as a grooming substitute and a means to convey "look out, a leopard is coming!" and then evolved into something more.
Posted by Proteus on February 3, 2010 at 1:36 PM
oh_man 8
OMG did you read that? 'Chatting helps bonding' !!!

Duh. I don't think there was need to cite Heidegger for that.
Posted by oh_man on February 3, 2010 at 1:47 PM
9
And grooming can so break down foregrounding itself like a broken hammer. One need only visit a mall to see how pervasive this failure of grooming actually is.
I wonder how man people have set off on the forrest path towards a more authentic way fo being becuase of a bad haircut.
Posted by kinaidos on February 3, 2010 at 1:48 PM
w7ngman 10
This might be nerd of me but I get really annoyed when people characterize evolution like this:

"humans developed language to serve the same purpose"
Posted by w7ngman http://userscripts.org/users/89370 on February 3, 2010 at 2:17 PM
julie russell 11
further proof that I am a monkey
Posted by julie russell http:// on February 3, 2010 at 2:27 PM
Free Lunch 12
@5 - I've read that first snippet ten times now, and I have no idea what is being said. Only original speech in a given context is pure? I don't think that covers the "in its turn" clause.

This guy may be a great thinker, but he's a horrible writer.
Posted by Free Lunch on February 3, 2010 at 5:09 PM
Irena 13
Yup -- he's talking about poetry, so you've basically grasped his meaning, but what a nightmare of a sentence he uses to convey it. It's a shame, too, because the ideas in the essay that's from, "Language," are brilliant, but it's almost too painful to read.
Posted by Irena on February 3, 2010 at 7:24 PM
Timmytee 14
Wasn't Heidegger a Nazi? (I mean a REAL fucking Nazi--not a Godwin Nazi.)
Posted by Timmytee on February 3, 2010 at 7:49 PM
Irena 15
Yes, he was a member of the Nazi Party, but that shouldn't keep people from reading his work. There's still debate about whether his politics were reflected in his philosophy. There is no debate that he was one of the most important philosophers of the twentieth century.

The primary ideology expressed in "Language" is Christianity, not National Socialism.
Posted by Irena on February 3, 2010 at 8:27 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy