Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Wednesday, February 3, 2010

Drug War Growing Under Obama's Watch

Posted by on Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 2:30 PM

Remember when the drug war ended under the watch of newly appointed drug czar (and former Seattle police chief) Gil Kerlikowske? Back in May, Kerlikowske said that he was banishing the concept of a “war on drugs” and shifting to treatment over jail time. Kerlikowske told the WSJ, "We're not at war with people in this country."

Well, yeah... this is what the end of the war looks like:

According to 2011 funding "highlights" released by the ONDCP, the Obama administration is growing the drug war and tilting its funds heavily toward law enforcement over treatment. ...

The budget places America's drug war spending at $15.5 billion for fiscal year 2011; an increase of 3.5 percent over FY 2010. That figure reflects a 5.2 percent increase in overall enforcement funding, growing from $9.7 billion in FY 2010 to $9.9 billion in FY 2011. Addiction treatment and preventative measures, however, are budgeted at $5.6 billion for FY 2011, an increase from $5.2 billion in FY 2010.

In short, the Obama administration's appropriations for treating drug addiction are just short of half that dedicated to prosecuting the war.

The budget for enforcement, interdiction, and international campaigns are more than double that of treatment. Treatment funding increased by a hair, but it's a fraction of enforcement. Moreover, in its drug budget (.pdf), the Obama Administration omits the costs of local drug enforcement and incarceration, which is an obvious attempt to minimize the actual cost of the drug war. But no matter how you look at it: The drug war is growing under Obama, not shrinking, and Kerlikowske's attempt to ditch the term "drug war" is laughable.

Much thanks to Nicole for the tip.

 

Comments (18) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
Jenny from the Block 1
"Ah, please you gotta help ol' Gil, whats it gonna take to keep you on the phone, I...dance for you? B-but you wouldn't even see it, y..a-alright, ha ha, I'm dancing!"
Posted by Jenny from the Block on February 3, 2010 at 2:49 PM
Will in Seattle 2
The more we lock up non-violent MJ consuming American citizens in prisons, the more we end up training them to become drug smugglers themselves.

Cause - and effect.

End the drug war now - it will kill off the gangs.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on February 3, 2010 at 2:54 PM
Supreme Ruler Of The Universe 3
I haven't had any alcohol or tobacco for 10 months.

I feel great and don't miss either one.

Right now I'm working on food addictions...and those are very real.

People should try to free themselves from all addictions. So the more penalties the better.
Posted by Supreme Ruler Of The Universe http://yrihf.com on February 3, 2010 at 2:57 PM
Packeteer 4
I should start by saying I support full legalization but consider this. If we put the axe on law enforcement all over it would put people out of jobs. Not a good reason to continue the drug war in the long run but it explains the political motivation behind increasing funding. Is it the right move? Perhaps not but I don't blame them for doing it under the pressure they have put on them.
Posted by Packeteer on February 3, 2010 at 2:59 PM
Fifty-Two-Eighty 5
Yet another example of The Big O being a lying sack of shit. I guess I shouldn't be surprised by now.
Posted by Fifty-Two-Eighty http://www.nra.org on February 3, 2010 at 3:03 PM
Hernandez 6
@5 Well, he is a politician. They are all lying sacks of shit to some degree.
Posted by Hernandez http://hernandezlist.blogspot.com on February 3, 2010 at 3:07 PM
7
pick the way things are analyzed. one or the other doesn't usually paint the whole picture.

by percentages of the previous amounts - the enforcement budget increased by 2.1%, treatment, etc increased by 7.7%

or the amount of increase in relation to the whole budget amount - treatment saw almost twice as big as an increase in funding treatment 2.6% to enforcement 1.3% .

granted the amount of funding is still the disparity.
Posted by beef on February 3, 2010 at 3:14 PM
Renton Mike 8
@7 in this economy we should be wondering why enforcement got an increase at all.
Posted by Renton Mike on February 3, 2010 at 3:18 PM
Fifty-Two-Eighty 9
Hernandez, you'll get no argument out of me on that one.
Posted by Fifty-Two-Eighty http://www.nra.org on February 3, 2010 at 3:21 PM
10
You guys have a point there but if you look at some of the details, funds for the Colombian drug war are decreasing. It's great to see that Indian Health Services are getting an increase in funds through 2011. I hope the money used for DHS is used to combat the crime in the cities/towns near the Mexican border where the fights with the drug lords are spewing over.
Posted by apres_moi on February 3, 2010 at 3:24 PM
Will in Seattle 11
@4 - we could have them build useful stuff, like high speed passenger rail lines or wind farms or solar farms instead.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on February 3, 2010 at 3:51 PM
Posted by shuvoff on February 3, 2010 at 3:52 PM
13
How dare you fuckers criticize or challenge Obama! How DARE you! Don't you know he died for your sins! He is NOT just another politician! He's black!
Posted by ObamatheChrist on February 3, 2010 at 4:00 PM
14
@7 for the win
Posted by Get Real on February 3, 2010 at 5:21 PM
Max Solomon 15
@4: full employment for narcs sure isn't a good reason to continue the war on drugs.
Posted by Max Solomon on February 3, 2010 at 7:15 PM
16
@15: speaking of which, there was a truly bizarre full page ad in the SeaTimes yesterday from a variety of prison guard groups railing against Gregoire's proposed cuts to the State prison budget. One of the sentences was to the effect that that given the bad economy, releasing inmates was a bad idea because they'd have no choice but to commit crimes in order to survive. Rarely have I seen such open acknowledgment that a primary function of US prisons is to warehouse the poor.
Posted by gnossos on February 3, 2010 at 9:15 PM
Westlake, son! 17
You mean Carr and Kerlikowske and weren't actually in favor of our lax pot laws and abused their power to push their personal beliefs?

I am shocked, shocked.
Posted by Westlake, son! on February 3, 2010 at 10:52 PM
18
@Packeteer - how about we leave the same budget in place for local LE and DEA but use the money to train those monkeys how to do something useful for society?
Posted by Gassy on March 8, 2010 at 3:11 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy