Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Thursday, January 28, 2010

So How'd Obama Do?

Posted by on Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 9:59 AM

Here's the speech, for those of you who missed it:


Now.

How'd Obama do?

 

Comments (17) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
sepiolida 1
this speech would be like 12 minutes if they would stop clapping
Posted by sepiolida on January 28, 2010 at 10:19 AM
Enigma 2
He's a great speech maker. He knows how to inspire and make you believe it's going to get better, eventually. Maybe soon.
But until he has some progressive victories under his belt, I'm not gonna get excited.
Posted by Enigma http://approvereferendum71.org/ on January 28, 2010 at 10:19 AM
very bad homo 3
After 8 years of not being able to watch Bush speak, this was wonderful.
Posted by very bad homo on January 28, 2010 at 10:23 AM
gloomy gus 4
Awesome speech, really excellent political theater too. Watching it was very different from reading it, though; on paper, some of the action plans show their thinness. Overall I came away with a heightened awareness of the gulf between what he appears capable of and what he's done.

I'm left hoping his experience of delivering that great speech inspires him to align his actions more closely with the spirit he espouses so beautifully.
Posted by gloomy gus on January 28, 2010 at 10:24 AM
Christin 5
He delivers a great speech. I was feeling awesome about it last night, in-the-moment (watching him work it work it, with four glasses of wine and a roomful of viewing-party friends) than I am this morning, as bloggers have written about the cracks and technicalities in some of the things he said. I'm still pleased this morning, though, more pleased with him than I've been in several months. "Won me back" is exactly right.
Posted by Christin on January 28, 2010 at 10:32 AM
Julie in Eugene 6
I usually just read the text of the speech, but I watched last night. I was pretty surprised at how good it was, at least to me. I was relatively pleased with the policy decisions discussed, I thought he "took to task" the right people with the right tone, there were definitely some funny moments. And, dammit, sometimes when he talks I think he's stealing the thoughts from my brain -- both on the policy side and on the more lofty philosophical stuff (e.g., politicians thinking about the next election instead of the next generation).

I am definitely discouraged by how little he's accomplished to date, but he did win me back a bit yesterday. I try to be cynical about it, knowing his 1st year record, but I do think he really believes some of the things he said in his closing paragraphs. I just hope he can be both hold those beliefs about how government should function and be an effective politician at the same time.
Posted by Julie in Eugene on January 28, 2010 at 10:35 AM
Jaymz 7
Agree @5 and @6 - I've been discouraged, but this helped a lot. It would help to have him speak more often. Still, I am very angry with the Democrats, and I really can't put the blame on POTUS for failing to get much of this done. I guess it isn't in his personal nature to shove things down the republicans' throats, but that is how I get medication into my dog and sometimes you just have to do that. The Dems need to grow some stones.
Posted by Jaymz on January 28, 2010 at 10:52 AM
Scalpel 8
The speech was good, but it would be nice to see some of these things actually happen, and I'm losing faith that Obama and the Democrats as a whole have the willpower to push through their agenda.

My wife and I aren't contributing any more money to the Democrats until they make a real effort to get shit done. When we contribute to a charity, we expect to see results, not empty promises. If the Democrats want more money, they need to show that they're doing something besides dithering and capitulating to every Republican who raises his voice.
Posted by Scalpel http://thegeekcastle.com on January 28, 2010 at 10:56 AM
9
Didn't watch. I played video games and watched Deadwood instead.
Posted by kersy on January 28, 2010 at 10:57 AM
10
TOTAL FAILURE. he had no plan to enact health care, he had no real jobs program, he's decided against a second stiumulus, this shit about $30 billion filtering thru banks for credit isn't a jobs program, the crap about a tuition credit so that in 20 years we have more engineers isn't a jobs program, the little bill the house passed isn't a big jobs program, and he ran to the center firmly choosing to be president of the confused independents instead of an effective agent of change.

It's hilarious, or should I say hillaryarious, to see all the obamatrons now praise him for doing exactly the kind of small bore minGOP stuff Bill Clinton did. What we will get is a kind of muddling through bland pro independents presidency, not change, and certainly not enough to really bring down unemployment, to really deal with climate, and to have real health care reform.

his big tactic is going to be to "hold the GOP responsible for governing if it continues to say no!" wow big fucking deal, like that will pass anything.

IT's exactly the problem described prior to his election. He had no record of actual legislative accomplishmemt. And today, he still is not getting the shit done like a Roosevelt or a LBJ. He's done some shit but only a third of what could have been done, but he chose to run to the center and pander to nelson and the gop instead of really going for change. Which he totally coulda. But that would be taking a risk. He's never taken a fucking risk in his life folks, dont' expect him to start taking risks for you now. Look at DADT. Totally not leading. Typical. Truman didn't beg the joint chiefs of staff to work thru this civil rights thing he ORDERED THEM TO DO IT.
Posted by "gulp gulp gulp! he won me back!" on January 28, 2010 at 10:57 AM
11
@7,

Have you tried wrapping it in bacon?

Giving medication to a cat is more apropos, I think. If you don't wrap the beast in a towel, it'll claw you to death.
Posted by keshmeshi on January 28, 2010 at 11:05 AM
12
The medication, not the dog.
Posted by keshmeshi on January 28, 2010 at 11:05 AM
Fnarf 13
It was a smart speech. Attacking the Supremes puts the Republicans on the defensive, something few Democrats have any conception of.
Posted by Fnarf http://www.facebook.com/fnarf on January 28, 2010 at 11:15 AM
Julie in Eugene 14
kesh, are you saying that Obama's agenda might go down a little easier if he wrapped it in some pork?
Posted by Julie in Eugene on January 28, 2010 at 11:15 AM
Hernandez 15
Mmm...bacon-wrapped agenda.
Posted by Hernandez http://hernandezlist.blogspot.com on January 28, 2010 at 11:26 AM
Will in Seattle 16
I was busy cheering when he p0wned the activist America-hating Supreme Court. Bacon is always good.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on January 28, 2010 at 11:56 AM
The Amazing Jim 17
Nice talk.
Now do the walk.
Posted by The Amazing Jim http://www.facebook.com/home.php?#/profile.php?id=100000076496291&ref=profile on January 28, 2010 at 12:42 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy