Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Tuesday, January 26, 2010

Seattle's Port Truckers: Supported by McGinn, Spurned by the Port

Posted by on Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 7:04 AM

The last couple days have seen some interesting developments in the port trucker story that I reported last month.

First, a short summary of the issue. Through a quirk in federal law, most Seattle's port truckers have been labeled "independent contractors" by their employers. This legal technicality may not sound like much, but it shifts all of the expenses on to the drivers, forcing them to pay for their own trucks, gas, taxes, etc, leaving the drivers with less than half of their annual income. To top it all off, it is illegal for independent contractors to organize a union. These guys are getting a really raw deal, and they can't easily negotiate a better one. Surrounding communities are impacted by the cheap, old trucks these guys drive (its all they can afford), which pump pollutants into the neighborhoods surrounding the port, sending respiratory illness rates skyrocketing.

This problem is common to ports throughout the country because the quirk in question is a part of the 1980 nationwide deregulation of the trucking industry. (For a thorough, wonky explanation of the issue check out David Bensman's excellent analysis.) Over the years, a coalition of labor unions, environmental groups, low-income advocates, concerned community members, and local politicians of both political stripes have been building pressure on the feds to close the legislative loophole.

Which leads me to interesting development #1. On Friday, January 22, Seattle Mayor Mike McGinn added his voice to the choir by writing a letter to senior Senator Patty Murray asking for her help in the upcoming legislative battle on Capitol Hill. Very cool. (The letter came at the end of the U.S. Conference of Mayors in D.C., where many of the mayors reportedly lobbied their congresspeople in a similar fashion.)

Interesting development #2 is less cheery. Yesterday, Port of Seattle CEO Tay Yoshitani went down to San Diego to petition members of the American Association of Port Authorities (AAPA) to back him up in his lobbying efforts against the truckers. I don't know much beyond the meeting itself right now, but I'm going to look into it today, and I'll hopefully be able to get some follow-up for you.

Yoshitani's stance against port reform has been clear for some time. The Port of Seattle has given K Street lobbyists, specifically McBee Strategic Consulting, $60,000 in Port money (i.e., taxpayer money) to combat closing the “independent contractor” loophole. Yoshianti has also entered into an alliance with the reactionary American Trucking Association (ATA), which has slowed down progressive change in ports nationwide by blocking LA’s Clean Trucks Program, which would have required trucking companies to take responsibility for the drivers and their dirty rigs. (The court battle between ATA and LA is preventing any other ports from enacting similar legislation, which is why the battle has moved to the halls of Congress.) The weird thing is that Yoshitani is technically a public employee, hired by the port commissioners, some of whom have come out in favor of Clean Truck legislation. So why is he being allowed to run around undercutting his bosses ? Sounds like a job for newly elected, pro-reform port commissioner Rob Holland!

Correction: The policy meeting was held in Tampa, not San Diego.

 

Comments (25) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
I'm glad you're following this.
Posted by MEC on January 26, 2010 at 7:24 AM
gloomy gus 2
I'm glad somebody's picked the story back up again after all these years, but the Paris Commune style you've got starts creaking when you paint it on so thick.
Posted by gloomy gus on January 26, 2010 at 8:19 AM
3
So glad you're writing about this. The Stranger is the new, improved, self-sustaining P-I.
Posted by too impatient to remember my username on January 26, 2010 at 8:43 AM
4
All trucks have to periodically pass an emissions test to get licensed. Jake, you are dishonest propagandist. When are you going to call or Liz or Yoko and organize the Stranger?
Posted by Forget it, Jake, it's Chinatown. on January 26, 2010 at 8:48 AM
zombie eyes 5
Not only do they have to pay for fuel, truck maintenance, etc, but also both halves of their Social Security and Medicare. They have to pay for their state disability and unimployment premiums. The 'subcontractor' ruse is a scam a bunch of employers would like to pull. The practice was mostly stopped by the IRS and state officials when it started to take off. It's just another method for unethical businesses to avoid paying their fair share, and another nosedive in the slow motion flight that is the 3rd-worldization of the US economy.
Posted by zombie eyes on January 26, 2010 at 8:50 AM
6
Let me get this right. According to the press release from enviros, public (taxpayer funded) officials are lobbying against this long list of groups and political leaders? What the heck are our elected port commissioners doing about this? Don't they need the support of these groups for their elections?

SEATTLE:
Cascade Chapter of the Sierra Club
Community Coalition for Environmental Justice
Council on American-Islamic Relations, Washington Chapter
Church Council of Greater Seattle
International Longshore & Warehouse Union, Local 19
Martin Luther King County Labor Council
People for Puget Sound
Puget Sound Sage
One America
Seattle/King County Building and Construction Trades Council
UFCW, Local 21
Unite Here, Local 8
Washington Community Action Network

NATIONAL:
Honorable Michael Bloomberg, Mayor of New York City
Honorable Cory Booker, Mayor of Newark
Honorable Antonio Villaraigosa, Mayor of Los Angeles
Honorable Ronald Dellums, Mayor of Oakland
Honorable Stacy Ritter, Mayor of Broward County (home to Port Everglades)
Honorable George Miller and 23 CA members of Congress
Honorable Nancy Pelosi, Speaker of the House, U.S. House of Representatives
Bay Area Air Quality Management District (CA)
Change to Win
International Brotherhood of Teamsters
Natural Resources Defense Council
Sierra Club
Port of Los Angeles
Port of Oakland
Port Authority of New York & New Jersey
Posted by Leaward on January 26, 2010 at 8:53 AM
7
What do you take us for? Half-wits? Talk about dirty. Dirty Jackass Jake, you're a shill for the longshore and teamsters. This isn't about clean air. All trucks have to pass emissions tests to get licensed.

You write in a scab paper. When are you going to call Liz or Yoko at the Guild and organize the Stranger?
Posted by Forget it, Jake, it's Chinatown. on January 26, 2010 at 9:04 AM
8
Thank you for covering this story.

Did you know McBee Strategic Consulting is the firm where former Airport Director Gina Marie Lindsey (after whom the Gina Marie Lindsey Arrival Hall at Seatac is named) worked after Seatac?

And did you know McBee is the firm where Micky D (Mic Dinsmore) arranged for an internship of the daughter of Congressman Norm Dicks? This was mentioned in the Seattle Times a few days ago.

Tay should stay away from McBee if he wants to avoid being another Micky D.
Posted by commentator on January 26, 2010 at 9:13 AM
9
@7 - I know I shouldn't bother responding to the moronic can't-use-a-consistent-name trolls, but...

Older trucks are held to far less stringent emissions requirements than newer ones, especially those built since 2007. For some pollutants, the new standards are at least an order of magnitude tighter than for trucks built in the late '80s and early '90s. Here's a summary I found in maybe thirty seconds of searching.
Posted by shabadoo on January 26, 2010 at 9:22 AM
Joe Szilagyi 10
Under what law is it independent for contractors to organize?

That stinks of unconstitutional.
Posted by Joe Szilagyi http://www.joeszilagyi.com on January 26, 2010 at 9:23 AM
GlennFleishman 11
Independent contractors cannot organize; this includes my profession of freelance writing. It's price fixing. Because we are not employees, we have no right to collective bargaining. If we organize to discuss any terms of our work--including pricing and such--as opposed to the work itself, we could be prosecuted. True for truckers as well as photographers, writers, etc.

The trucker situation is basically a way for the ports and shippers to earn money by exploiting the truckers. There's no second issue here. The truckers can't improve their earnings because the ports set fees unilaterally. When fuel costs skyrocketed, the port was able to have truckers absorb that. When truckers have to idle for hours because of security issues, the port lets truckers absorb that.

Eventually, either it will be unaffordable for people to be truckers (it sounds marginally better than McDonald's now with worse hours and worse benefits and worse working conditions), or the cartel of ports has to be broken, and the law changed.

When that happens, shipping costs will go way up, which is fine, because they are artificially subsidized by the truckers (and our too-low gas taxes in this country). The reason that China and other countries have "cheap import goods" is partly because of how they control currency in their countries, not allowing them to float; partly because of the US demand for selling debt to finance our unsustainable way of life; partly because big businesses, including the ports, have juryrigged the system so that the real cost of delivering goods (including environmental impact) is offloaded on to other businesses and to taxpayers.
Posted by GlennFleishman http://blog.glennf.com/ on January 26, 2010 at 10:04 AM
12
Good article! The rest of the commission needs to get their heads out of the sand and support the drivers!!
Posted by Big A on January 26, 2010 at 10:08 AM
Will in Seattle 13
The problem isn't while the trucks dwell in the ports, it's the surrounding Seattle neighborhoods impacted by them.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on January 26, 2010 at 10:13 AM
14
I live in Long Beach right by the port and I really am pissed at this asshat Yoshitani. It's bad enough port officials here in this LA bedroom city caved to the industry bullies, unlike LA officials who stood up to them, but now this guy is undermining our local clean-air fight as well as screwing people and truck drivers in Seattle? Good for your mayor and commissioner who are on the right side of the debate.
Posted by Barry Michaels on January 26, 2010 at 10:13 AM
15
I thought the truckers were hired directly by the shippers on a per-container basis? If this is true, and they work for different shippers every day, then being a contractor makes sense. They can always form trucking companies to take the contracts instead, if that is what they prefer.

It seems the real issue is that they want to be paid more. That's understandable, and a union would probably help. The tradeoff would probably be that a lot of them would then lose their jobs, and go bankrupt because they can't pay for their trucks, but the ones who remain would make a living wage.

I wish they wouldn't present this as an environmental issue. The way to help the environment is to require higher quality trucks. Paying the truckers more might or might not cause them to buy more expensive trucks.
Posted by Larn on January 26, 2010 at 10:18 AM
16
like everyone else says, thank you thank you thank you for covering this. i'm not a trucker, nor do i know any - and i suspect that this is my loss.

thanks also to mcginn.
Posted by grapher mcfly on January 26, 2010 at 10:45 AM
17

Well, where is the Commission? And not just Holland. Bryant, Albro, Creighton, Tarleton, all of them campaigned on making the Port open. Like on so many issues, that seems like empty talk from the Commissioners right about now. Why are they letting Yoshitani work to strip the port of its ability to set environmental and safety standards on the trucks? And why are they letting him do it under a veil of secrecy?
Posted by Echo HIll on January 26, 2010 at 10:56 AM
GlennFleishman 18
@15: Larn: They are essentially employees, made into contractors by a loophole, just as been used in some other industries.

The fact is, they cannot set or negotiate fees, are told where and when to do what they do. The only way they are "independent" is that they are required to own their own gear.

As for forming shipping companies, it is to laugh, the naivete. If they formed such companies, the port will simply not hire those companies and hire other drivers who were less organized.
Posted by GlennFleishman http://blog.glennf.com/ on January 26, 2010 at 10:57 AM
19
Thanks for bringing this story back up, Jake! This is a Real issue that needs to be addressed! The Port of Seattle commissioners and CEO Tay Yoshitani need to be held accountable for poor decisions being made about the truck drivers, their trucks and the pollution effecting all of the surrounding neighborhoods.. We elect these folks, so lets make sure the right thing is being done. Pay attention King County...just because you voted for these folks doesn't mean they are doing the right thing. Keep the pressure on!
Posted by NW Surfer Girl on January 26, 2010 at 12:13 PM
20
@11 Glen...thanks for that post. You just helped me put this issue into perspective, and opened the application of it to lots of places beyond the Port.

As I understand what you are saying, the move to Independent Contractors, while looking like it gives employees more freedom, actually constrains them in novel ways, such as the inability to organize through price-fixing laws.

Fascinating.
Posted by Timothy on January 26, 2010 at 12:26 PM
Joe Szilagyi 21
Is the Port of Seattle under Tay a public entity, subject to FOIA?
Posted by Joe Szilagyi http://www.joeszilagyi.com on January 26, 2010 at 12:46 PM
Joe Szilagyi 22
Ah, it is.

Surely it's time someone ran up a FOIA on all union-busting financials, communications, and memos, and posted them online?
Posted by Joe Szilagyi http://www.joeszilagyi.com on January 26, 2010 at 12:48 PM
23
The era of globalization (as we know it) is coming to an end. There is no replacement for petroleum. Conserving remaining reserves will necessitate much less transport in fewer trucks designed for the long haul, much less shipping, air travel and personal driving. (handwriting on the wall)
Posted by Wells on January 26, 2010 at 1:38 PM
24
The only dirty smoke here is being blown up the publics a$$ by the labor backed Green Coalition group controled by the labor folk at Change-to-win along with their cronies at the Teamsters Union. As far as owner-operator truckers not being able to negotiate or join a union how about the ones that are members of the longshoremen or even the Teamster Owner-operator member truckers in Alaska. This statement is totally false. there are ways to satisfy antitrust laws by employee recognition of the owner-driver while he/she still owns their truck so there is more to this scam by the so-called GREEN army. This clean air BS plan of the coalition is really about moving in the bigger trucking companies to replace the O/O trucker because it's easier for their freinds Teamsters to organize company drivers than deal with the O/O. If the truth be known there is only a small percentage of harbor pollution actually coming from truckers compared to other sources or industry around the peirs. How about solving the problem of truckers being held up in the process of loading/unloading cans at the port first before blasting off on an agenda to take away individual ownership rights as the Green Coalition of phonies is trying to do........
Posted by Port Trucker on January 26, 2010 at 8:54 PM
25
Action against the misclassification of employees as Independent contractors in New York: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/18/busine…
Posted by Haku on February 18, 2010 at 10:58 AM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy