I'm as intrigued as anyone about what Apple may (or may not) announce tomorrow, but I'm particularly intrigued—and a bit confused—by the amped up speculation happening today, much of it based on this NYT article.
Particularly odd is the following section, which lays out pretty specific specs for this not-yet-released product:
Part of the media industry’s high hope for the tablet comes from descriptions of the device from analysts and others who have been briefed on it.It will run all the applications of the iPhone and iPod Touch, have a persistent wireless connection over 3G cellphone networks and Wi-Fi, and will be built with a 10-inch color display, allowing newspapers, magazines and book publishers to deliver their products with an eye to the design that had grabbed readers in print.
There's another quote attributed to "a person who has seen the device and is familiar with Apple’s marketing plan for it, but who did not want to be named because talking about it might alienate him from the company."
Apple is one of the most secretive consumer product companies in the world. If these attributions are true, this would be a MAJOR shift in the way they do things. Alienated? If this guy was named he'd probably have to go into the Witness Protection Program.
Since when does Apple brief anybody outside a very small inner circle, let alone "analysts and others" on future products? When the iPhone came out, a vanishingly small number of people had ever seen the device. It's highly likely that anyone who had seen it (game developers, accessory makers) had signed an aggressive NDA. Most of the people writing the software for it hadn't even seen it, but suddenly they're briefing analysts and random other people with friends at the Times?
Weird, I tells ya.
7
9
10
Comments (13) RSS