Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Saturday, January 23, 2010

McGinn Sets Targets for Staffing Cuts

Posted by on Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 11:13 AM

Yesterday afternoon, Mayor Mike McGinn sent a memo to city department heads setting targets for reducing staff positions. In his first week in office, he announced that he would eliminate 200 "senior-level positions" in an effort to help close the city's budget gap, explaining that "estimates are that the City will face a general-fund budget deficit of at least $40 million in 2011." But some of the largest cuts he's targeted come from Seattle Public Utilities (43 positions) and Seattle City Light (46 positions), which get funding largely from utility fees, not the city's general fund. However, those departments also gained some of the most new high-level positions under the Nickels Administration. It will be interesting to see how many of these actually result in firings, and how many of the reductions involve not filling vacancies.

McGinn's memo is after the jump. These are the department-by-department staff cuts proposed by McGinn:

target_staff_reductions.jpg

Allocation of Senior Position Review Targets
January 22, 2010

Between 2002 and 2009, City government has seen significant growth in the number of senior-level positions. This combined with an anticipated 2011 General Fund deficit in the $40 million range, as well as financial challenges in many of the City’s non-General Funds, resulted in Mayor McGinn calling for a review of senior management positions with the goal of eliminating or reclassifying 200 positions. As discussed in the January 21, 2010 memorandum from Acting Budget Director Beth Goldberg, the table below allocates the 200 senior-level position goal among the Executive branch departments. The senior-level position targets are allocated among Executive branch departments based on a combination
of three factors:

1) the number of senior-level positions created through the reclassification of vacant lower level positions to senior-level positions outside of the budget process;
2) the number of senior-level positions that were eliminated from departments as part of the 2010 adopted budget process;
3) the overall growth in the number of senior-level positions between 2002 and 2010

The total number of positions allocated among departments is 200. The 2010 adopted budget already abrogated 20 senior-level positions, meaning that the 200 positions allocated here exceeds the Mayor’s target by 20 positions. Additional positions are being allocated as part of this process to give the Mayor options as he makes decisions on how to eliminate or reclassify positions based on feedback and analysis from departments. Please refer to the January 21, 2010 memo for specific instructions about how to respond to the target allocations assigned above.

The targets reflected here are intended to be the starting point of a dialog between departments, the City Budget Office and the Mayor’s Office. These targets do not reflect final decisions. Discussions about these targets and the operational implications of reductions and/or reclassifications will take place over the next two months. Implementation decisions could occur in 2010 or as part of the 2011-2012 budget process. In addition to weighing the operational implications of decisions to reduce or reclassify senior level positions, the Mayor’s Office also intends on considering race and social justice issues as decisions are reached.

 

Comments (19) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
gloomy gus 1
Good coverage of this one aspect of the story, yeah. C'mon.
Posted by gloomy gus on January 23, 2010 at 11:33 AM
2
SUCH BULLSHIT

Both City Light - and - Public Utilities have raised rates by big jumps in recent years, to pay for better service.

Fire some of the paper pushers at City hall, not in service agencies that all of us use every day .... every day ...electricIty, water, sewer and garbage.

MC GINN IS A SACK OF SHIT THAT WILL BE HARD TO FLUSH AWAY, CAUSE THE SEWER IS PLUGGED AND NOBODY ON WATCH TO CLEAR IT.... he fired them.
Posted by Kill the Functioning City we USE Every Day on January 23, 2010 at 11:43 AM
3
I always thought that McGinn's promise of a "Public fiber optic network" was basically a lie. Cutting the IT staff shows it was never really one of his true priorities.
Posted by Zander on January 23, 2010 at 12:25 PM
4
Zander: Clearly, firing 1/8th of the IT staff during a budget cutting measure means that fiber was never one of his priorities?
Posted by supergp on January 23, 2010 at 12:55 PM
The Magic Lemur 5
Some of Most - The laziest Borg in the Collective.
Posted by The Magic Lemur on January 23, 2010 at 1:09 PM
6
Can you publish a flowchart for Index Newspapers, LLC? I'm curious what other companies your parent corporation owns, and it's rather secretive except for the Portland Mercury. Boise Weekly? Missoula Independent? Foundation? The Onion? Ballard Oil? The Mercury Group?
Posted by SeattleJoe on January 23, 2010 at 1:50 PM
7
@5: I'm now using "Not the brightest Borg in the Collective" as a diminutive amongst my friends.
Posted by supergp on January 23, 2010 at 2:10 PM
8
Magic Lemur you just made my day.
Posted by Patrick McGrath on January 23, 2010 at 2:36 PM
Catalina Vel-DuRay 9
Actually, aside from the latest increase (which amounts to about a penny a kilowatt hour) City Light hasn't had a non-BPA driven rate increase since the 2001 Enron increase - and rates went down after that was over. City Light is run on a shoestring, and that shoestring is getting frayed.

But that's what you get when the mayor and council use the utilities both as a cash cow and a tool for votes.

The utilities really should be insulated from political influence, and placed under some sort of commission that would oversee their budget and raise or lower rates accordingly. We're incredibly blessed to own our utilities here, and that responsibility deserves better stewardship.

Posted by Catalina Vel-DuRay http://www.danlangdon.com on January 23, 2010 at 4:14 PM
Max Solomon 10
@7: not 'not the most assimilated borg in the collective'?
Posted by Max Solomon on January 23, 2010 at 7:05 PM
11
Weird. I originally commented #6 in the flowchart post but I'm not SeattleJoe. I guess I'm flattered by the retweets (recomments?).

PS I was facetious about Ballard Oil but Index seems to have some kind of connections to the others.
Posted by tofugerbil on January 23, 2010 at 7:44 PM
12
What does it mean that they are going to consider Race and Social Justice issues??
Posted by Native Seattlelite on January 23, 2010 at 8:22 PM
Will in Seattle 13
@12 - it means they're not going to use Last Hired First Fired rules that allow White Men to use their seniority to get rid of Non-Caucasian Women who finally got promoted after CENTURIES where only white men got promoted.

You Got A PROBLEM with that?
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on January 23, 2010 at 8:33 PM
Catalina Vel-DuRay 14
Oh Will, don't be such a drama queen. If you think the city management pool is comprised mainly of white men, you need to get out more. This isn't the 60's.

And yes, they are very much going to use the last hired first fired rule. Race & Social Justice is an employee education program that has no bearing on Civil Service employment rules.
Posted by Catalina Vel-DuRay http://www.danlangdon.com on January 23, 2010 at 9:36 PM
15
Supergp-

Projects take time, money and staff. That's true for pot holes, housing and whatever. Clearly, if you cut the pot hole crews you won't fill as many pot holes as you would have before you cut the crew. Is this really so hard for you to understand. Do I need to draw it in crayon for you?

Providing Fiber Optic to a city of our size is a lot more complicated than that but, I get the feeling you think the internet is a magic series of tubes.

If not. Do submit your detailed proposal of how the city can undertake this majoy initiative with 1/8 less IT staff?
Posted by Zander on January 24, 2010 at 2:41 AM
16
Zander, don't you think McGinn should answer that question since he pushed the fiberoptic issue?
Posted by sarah68 on January 24, 2010 at 8:24 PM
17
Sorry to inform you....the city has "bumping"...that means an SA who is laid off but used to be an engineer can bump a lower person out of a job, and that person can bump someone below them....bottom line, the lower, newer employees will be the ones without jobs.
Posted by worker bee on January 25, 2010 at 11:04 AM
18
Interesting that Seattle journalists have not reported that City of Seattle’s Union employees have been laid off in force in a number of departments (DPD, SCL) and the Call Center (union) employees have had their works hours cut to 38 instead of 40.

Union employees have to take 2 weeks unpaid for 2010…and McGinn has just stated that for the next 3 months Apex or Executive level employees (Exec, Managers & Strategic Advisors) do not.

Performance Audit of SPU by WA State Auditor’s Ofc. “SPU managers supervise fewer employees than their peers in similar government agencies, a condition that increases costs.” The average manager makes $112,000. Receives not only vacation, sick leave, but also Merit or Exec leave. And the option of only working 4 hours a day. That’s right folks APEX employees…only have to be a work 4 hours a day.

If you doubt these comments contact the SPU Public Disclosure Officer. For example you can request who works at City, their date of hire, salary, overtime, work paid travel, and their job classification.
Posted by 12nwfwo9 on January 25, 2010 at 11:16 AM
19
FYI. An SA at the City of Seattle cannot bump a lower level employee. Read the City of Seattle personnel rules.

The 4 hours a day rule applies if a person is working additional hours (remember no overtime is paid to these employees) they may flex their schedule if approved in advance by their manager. Most of these employees work well over 40 hours a week with no overtime.
Posted by Let's get the record straight on January 28, 2010 at 6:16 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy