Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Friday, January 15, 2010

Greenpeace Asks Microsoft and Nintendo to Stop Killing Us So Hard, Please

Posted by on Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 1:04 PM

Though it's unlikely any console gamer will switch to the PS3 based on advice from Greenpeace, last month's Guide to Greener Electronics (pdf link) shows Sony doing relatively well in the drive toward less toxic, more sustainable gadgetry. They're still far behind the reigning champions at Nokia, but Nintendo and Microsoft are struggling to climb up from the bottom.

Oh, Nintendo. Power up!
  • Oh, Nintendo. Power up!

The report is as quick to praise as it is to condemn (quicker, actually). Nintendo's last place mention comes with a note that they're doing a better job of not filling their gear with poison, so good on them.

The Stranger Testing Department is Rob Lightner and Paul Hughes.

 

Comments (8) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
TheMisanthrope 1
Didn't Paul actually call their ratings techniques into question earlier this week?
Posted by TheMisanthrope on January 15, 2010 at 2:06 PM
Will in Seattle 2
shh, @1. don't ruin a good story.

A lot of this has to do with enforceable regulation and law in the locations for production, mind you.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on January 15, 2010 at 2:12 PM
3
When it comes to the energy efficiency of game consoles, Sony is dead last and Nintendo is far ahead.
http://www.nrdc.org/energy/consoles/file…
Posted by John in NYC on January 15, 2010 at 2:30 PM
Will in Seattle 4
@3 how many coal-fired plants and oil-spawned terrorists died to fuel your 42 inch 1080p plasma HDTV set you run your PS3 with ... bet it's a lot more than my 22 inch DTV set with a Wii ...

(caveat - I own 200 shares of Nintendo and have owned shares of Sony and Microsoft before)
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on January 15, 2010 at 2:56 PM
Fnarf 5
I don't think it makes sense to rate companies, but rather products. And clarifies what they mean by "green" -- is it more important to use fewer toxic materials, fewer rare minerals mined by slaves, less manufacturing energy, less usage energy, less recyclability, what?

Will raises a good point, however ineptly. The percentage of total energy use that goes just to TVs has tripled in recent years, and is now something north of 8 or 9 percent of all electricity. That's a crisis position right there. One giant plasma screen offsets the good of a hell of a lot of Prius miles and reusable bags. Also, no one who discards one of the 100 million or so working cell phones that get tossed into the landfill in the US every year gets to brag about their green, no matter what kind of idiot game system they run.

Gadgets aren't green, period.
Posted by Fnarf http://www.facebook.com/fnarf on January 15, 2010 at 3:43 PM
Will in Seattle 6
@5 - yeah, but a solar-powered Prius with a 52 inch plasma screen in it, now that's what I call a car camping set!
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on January 15, 2010 at 4:00 PM
hungryjonny 7
Nintendo at least was rated low because of it's failure to disclose information, not because of it's actual practices.
Posted by hungryjonny on January 15, 2010 at 4:39 PM
8
nokia achieved this high rating across the board recently. although their gadgets work very well, including the gaminess!
Posted by fin on January 15, 2010 at 7:05 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy