Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Monday, January 11, 2010

Make Him Stop

Posted by on Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 4:55 PM

Jesus, 2010 already sucks. Tim Eyman has filed four initiatives with the Secretary of State's office—in the last week. All three where the text is available (no text is posted for one of them) are variations of a requirement that the legislature must have a two-thirds majority to increase taxes. This rule is already on the books thanks to Eyman's Initiative 960, which passed in 2007, but that measure is now two years old, meaning the legislature is allowed to suspend it—which is exactly what the legislature should do this winter. And this fall, voters should know to reject the next Tim Eyman initiative. And in between, hopefully the Seattle Times, having seen the devastation to state programs from I-960, won't come out slobbering all over Eyman again.

 

Comments (17) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
Oh my Jesus. Tim Eyman is a waste of taxpayer dollars. Can't we send him to Idaho? Oregon?
Posted by alan on January 11, 2010 at 5:39 PM
Will in Seattle 2
I'm thinking of a user fee, and it starts with Tim E and other filers of unconstitutional filers of initiatives.

Can I get a Three Strikes and you're out Fine, brothers?

Amen!
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on January 11, 2010 at 5:41 PM
Will in Seattle 3
(wait that was a circular filer ... um ... oh, you know what I mean)
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on January 11, 2010 at 5:42 PM
kk in seattle 4
These rules that the Legislature can or can't do that are just stupid. They don't bind the Legislature at all, which has plenary legislative power unless expressly constrained by the State Constitution or federal law. This is simply a scheme to pay the Eyman mortgage and feed the Eyman ego, utterly without force of law.
Posted by kk in seattle on January 11, 2010 at 5:57 PM
kk in seattle 5
Oh, and Will @2, under Article II, Section 1(d) of the State Constitution, the Legislature is permitted to enact legislation to facilitate the operation of the initiative and referendum process; by implication, the Legislature is not permitted to enact legislation that constrains the operation of the initiative and referendum process.
Posted by kk in seattle on January 11, 2010 at 6:02 PM
Sargon Bighorn 6
Tax me more please tax me more please more more more. And remember people, if a lower tax initiative does pass, please feel free to send what your heart tells you to send to Olympia. You know the need is there don't wait to be taxed, I mean asked.
Posted by Sargon Bighorn on January 11, 2010 at 6:45 PM
7
The initiative process if broken if it allows grandstanding ass-clowns endless opportunities to try to dismantle our functioning government through the initiative process.
Posted by Grover Norquist on January 11, 2010 at 7:04 PM
8

The Seattle Times is not alone in its slobbering. Virtually the entire Olympia press corps, what's left of it, turned out for Eyman's 32-minute, 40-second sound bite fest.
Opponents of Eyman's initiative were on hand. Essex Porter of KIRO-TV and a couple others did talk to them. But Eyman foes were snubbed by radio folk, notably KOMO Radio and Austin Jenkins of NPR.
Will KPLU and KUOW listeners, Tuesday morning, hear just an Eyman sound bite.
The larger question: Why do Olympia reporters continue to whore for this guy?
Posted by edmund burke on January 11, 2010 at 7:12 PM
9
Don't be concerned by how many initiatives Eyman has submitted. He usually submits many drafts and then finally settles on one to actually carry forward.
Posted by Citizen R on January 11, 2010 at 9:20 PM
Spicy McHaggis 10
Tim should register as Michael Dunsmire's domestic partner and leave the initiative business.
Posted by Spicy McHaggis on January 11, 2010 at 9:35 PM
11
so, um, how come this prior supermajority requirement was not struck down as unconstitutional?

Democrats too scaredy pants to sue?
Posted by really, am asking... on January 11, 2010 at 9:35 PM
Will in Seattle 12
@5 - i'll settle for tarring and feathering Tim E and riding him out of the State on a rail
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on January 11, 2010 at 10:29 PM
Telsa Grills 13
Does Tim even have a day job?
Posted by Telsa Grills on January 12, 2010 at 6:43 AM
Fool multitude 14
@13: As "kk in seattle" implies at #4 Eyman makes his living submitting these initiatives. This is his business.
Posted by Fool multitude on January 12, 2010 at 7:40 AM
Vince 15
Tim Eyman wants to turn Washington into a dysfunctional state like his ilk have turned California into a dysfunctional state. They think they can stop the government from functioning if they target the foolish and naive with their claiming to stop taxes. The truth is they want to cripple the government for their rich friends benefit. We either want a government that continues to represent all our people or just the well connected. We either want a government that maintains a decent standard of living or we don't. They want to turn us into the exact thing they did in the south. Bad education. Bad health. Bad standard of living.
Posted by Vince on January 12, 2010 at 8:18 AM
kk in seattle 16
@11: They did sue. The State Supreme Court dismissed the case on procedural grounds, refusing to issue a writ of mandamus. Brown v. Owen, 165 Wn.2d 706, 206 P.3d 310 (2009).
Posted by kk in seattle on January 12, 2010 at 10:41 AM
17
@5 Will, only if we can open it up to everyone helping. Actually, it could likely be a great fundraister to help fund the programs that are losing money.
Posted by seattlenick on January 12, 2010 at 12:39 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy