I am writing about a really awesome guy who I have been dating for about 3 months. He is hot, smart, fun, and successful. The icing on the cake is that he is great in bed—creative, fun and attentive. His fetishes are pretty vanilla—pigtails, knee socks, little girl costumes, and anal sex. Even though I am not a huge fan of pigtails or anal, I have been GGG and he seems more than satisfied with the way things are going. I should also point out that he has been GGG as well, fully committing to my rape fantasy and playing the part flawlessly.Sounds perfect, right? Well the problem surfaced last night when we were discussing marriage (not specific to us, just in general), and he said, clearly and directly, that he would immediately end a relationship with any woman who was not open to costumes or anal sex. Since he said ANY woman (and I asked him to verify the inclusiveness of the word “any”, which he did) I can only assume that if I ever decided I was over dressing like a 10 year old or having his dick in my ass, he would leave me—whether we were 3 months or 30 years in. Although I don’t have a problem with practicing his fetishes, I do have a problem with him insinuating that no matter what else I have to offer, it will never be as important as knee socks and fucking me in the ass. Is he not, in effect, comparing my best qualities to anal sex and giving anal sex the one up? I am also extremely turned off by feeling obligated to do something. Basically, he gave me an ultimatum: if I don’t fulfill these fetishes, he will leave me. I am more than happy to don Girl Scout costumes when he asks nicely, particularly because it turns him on, but the second he turned it into a demand, it made me want to tell him to go fuck himself.
Am I being irrational? Is it normal for men to rate knee socks and anal sex above personality and integrity? Or should I see this as a red flag and get away before we get too serious?
TT
My response after the jump...
You are being irrational.
You're three months into a new relationship with a great guy. You're having fun, he's having fun, you're happy to indulge him, he's happy to indulge you. What's the problem? All he did was let you know—in perhaps an insensitive and inarticulate manner—that he could never be truly happy in a relationship that wasn't as sexually fulfilling as the one he has with you now or be happy with a partner who wasn't as awesome and indulgent as you are. Take the compliment, TT. I don't think he meant imply that all your other qualities are pale in comparison to your willingness to pull on knee socks and take it in the ass. But if that's how his comments made you feel, TT, by all means tell him so. Smile and laugh and punch him in the shoulder and ask him if he meant to say that he would be happy to marry a woman who repulsed him emotionally and intellectually and romantically just so long as she wore the costumes and had the anal. Betcha a buttfucking that he says no.
And, again, it's only been three months. Do you really want to obsess about what things will be like thirty years in the future at this stage? You don't know him well enough at this point to know if you'll be together 30 months, TT, much less 30 years.
People change and grow over time—emotionally and sexually—and your sex lives will evolve and grow and change if you wind up together for the rest of your lives. I'm 15 years into a relationship, TT, and you'll just have to trust me on this: stuff moves on and off the menu as the years go by. What doesn't change—if it's present at the start and you're careful to preserve it—is your mutual willingness to find enjoyment in giving each other pleasure. Will he still want you to dress up for him and have anal sex with him thirty years into this relationship? I have no idea, TT. Maybe. Probably. But why assume that you won't want to dress up for him and have anal sex with him thirty years from now?
Unless, of course, you're trying to sabotage this relationship.
1
2
3
4
6
8
9
10
12
15
17
20
22
24
25
26
27
28
29
31
35
36
38
41
42
45
48
50
Comments (52) RSS