Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Tuesday, January 5, 2010

The Social Human

Posted by on Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 3:59 PM

One of the many wonderful things to happen to me recently was discovering the provocative thoughts contained of William James' book The Essays in Radical Empiricism. The most impressive essay in this collection is "A World of Pure Experience." Aside from its challenging reformulation of relations between things into actual things themselves, and its total rejection of notions of the absolute, which attempt to resolve/rationalize the object/subject split (there are no splits or gulfs for an absolute to fill; there is only the rush of experience), there are several startling passages, one of which is this:

What I do feel simply when a later moment of my experience succeeds an earlier one is that though they are two moments, the transition from the one to the other is continuous. Continuity here is a definite sort of experience; just as definite as is the discontinuity-experience which I find it impossible to avoid when I seek to make the transition from an experience of my own to one of yours. In this latter case I have to get on and off again, to pass from a thing lived to another thing only conceived, and the break is positively experienced and noted.

Again and again, we consumers of capitalist services, products, and ideologies must remind ourselves that the human is by nature a social creature. Not only do biological systems like the mirror neurons improve the social bonds between humans, make the "on again and off again" an easier, smoother transition, but even our eyes are adapted for greater soul-transparency, and greater soul-transparency increases the strength of soul-to-soul bonds. And what is it about our eyes that improves our sociability—the human condition that capitalism most exploits (the privatization of the general intellect)? The sclera:

Comparisons of human eyes to those of other primates reveal several subtle differences that help make ours stand out. For example, the human eye lacks certain pigments found in primate eyes, so the outer fibrous covering, or "sclera," of our eyeball is white. In contrast, most primates have uniformly brown or dark-hued sclera, making it more difficult to determine the direction they're looking from their eyes alone.

Another subtle aid that helps us determine where another person is looking is the contrast in color between our facial skin, sclera and irises. Most apes have low contrast between their eyes and facial skin.

Humans are also the only primates for whom the outline of the eye and the position of the iris are clearly visible. In addition, our eyes are more horizontally elongated and disproportionately large for our body size compared to most apes. Gorillas, for example, have massive bodies but relatively small eyes.

We can get so much information (a wealth of information) from these eyes.

These eyes, however, try to hide everything. The gorilla is a born capitalist, a rugged individual, an unshakable Thatcherite. His eyes share as little as possible.

 

Comments (4) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
Free Lunch 1
Both the woman and the gorilla seem to be saying the same thing with their eyes: "What the fuck are you looking at?"
Posted by Free Lunch on January 5, 2010 at 4:27 PM
laterite 2
She hot.
Posted by laterite on January 5, 2010 at 5:09 PM
3
It's also really hard to figure out when a gorilla is bluffing. But if you raise hard, they'll always fold. Gorillas don't have the nerve for real poker.
Posted by dwight moody on January 5, 2010 at 5:21 PM
4
She wants me.
Posted by She wants me really bad. on January 5, 2010 at 6:53 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

Want great deals and a chance to win tickets to the best shows in Seattle? Join The Stranger Presents email list!


All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy