Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Wednesday, December 30, 2009

2010 Marriage Protection Signature Drive

Posted by on Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 7:40 AM

It's too late to save Karl Rove's marriage—or Doug Manchester's marriage—but the folks who are trying to ban straight divorce in California are hard at work.

Traditional marriage is for life. Which means Karl and Doug shouldn't have been allowed to get out of their marriages alive, right?

 

Comments (34) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
See, this biting satire is funny to someone who isn't already an asshat. Asshats aren't going to see the humor, or the error of their ways, or whatnot. Asshats aren't going to say "Gee, my denying other's rights is as bad as if someone tried to deny mine," or "The ability to bring about these Propositions is unfair, even when the topic is something I believe in."

Asshats will always game the system in their favor, cry foul if it's gamed against them, and ignore anything close to logic, reason, or compassion. There will never be a way to reach them.
Posted by make dir on December 30, 2009 at 7:55 AM
gloomy gus 2
It's amazing such fine actors weren't already booked on other projects. I especially like the sensible gal with the tragic hair at the very end.
Posted by gloomy gus on December 30, 2009 at 7:59 AM
3
I don't know why this is a faux petition drive. It was my idea months ago to do this for real. It makes perfect since. If you go to the Bible and see what Jesus says about divorce, then why would these self-righteous Christians allow state-sponsored divorce? I think we should start the petition for real right away.
Posted by DC Bill on December 30, 2009 at 8:02 AM
biju 4
"If my man be hittin' ME?" - holy shit, fine actors indeed.
Posted by biju on December 30, 2009 at 8:07 AM
Vince 5
So if this passed the courts would not prmptly rule it unconstitutional? You can bet they would!
Posted by Vince on December 30, 2009 at 8:21 AM
Fifty-Two-Eighty 6
I've said it before here, and I guess I'm gonna say it again, but having been married - and divorced - it is completely beyond me why anybody in their right mind would ever want to get married. I guess when you're "in love," that whole right mind thing sorta goes out the window, but I know I won't be doing it again.
Posted by Fifty-Two-Eighty http://www.nra.org on December 30, 2009 at 8:28 AM
Packeteer 7
I appreciate the point you are making Dan but traditional marriage often has provisions for divorce. The old testament has a provision for divorce if there is adultery although some interpret this as only during the period of engagement before the wedding, however once a person was engaged they were "married" already in Jewish culture around the time the bible was written.

In Islam there is much more said about divorce. Such as there is a 4 month period after separation when god will accept the marriage back but after that it must be made permanent.

So as Dan has said before. Heterosexuals have already redefined marriage several times and we would mostly all agree it has been for good. What is wrong with one more tweak to the system?
Posted by Packeteer on December 30, 2009 at 8:39 AM
Anthony Hecht 8
Agree with @3 - They should do this for real. Making it over-the-top ironic comedy schtick just makes people who already support it laugh and people who don't support it ignore it. If it's real, they can't ignore it.
Posted by Anthony Hecht on December 30, 2009 at 8:55 AM
9
We'll call your bluff, Dan.
We'll gladly outlaw divorce
and in return
the Gays STFU about homosexual marriage.
Posted by Call and Raise on December 30, 2009 at 9:22 AM
Will in Seattle 10
Remember, it's not how many concubines you have, according to the Bible, it's how many wives and handmaidens.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on December 30, 2009 at 9:31 AM
11
Folks, this is an actual ballot initiative campaign. Of course it was undertaken to poke the pro-Prop. 8 people in the eye, but the petitions are being circulated.
Posted by Calpete on December 30, 2009 at 9:49 AM
Bill W. 12
Please join their Facebook fanpage:
http://www.facebook.com/pages/2010-Calif…
...And suggest it to your friends.
Posted by Bill W. http://www.seattlegayscene.com on December 30, 2009 at 10:09 AM
COMTE 13
An empty wager @9, because you know straights will NEVER allow a "no-divorce marriage law" to go into effect.

Nice try though, and thanks for playing; we'll send you the home version of the game.
Posted by COMTE http://www.chriscomte.com on December 30, 2009 at 10:11 AM
14
Dan, fyi, the American Psychological Association is funneling their members dollars in Doug Manchester's pocket right now. Go to bioethicsforum.org/ and click on the first post ("Attention Shoppers").
Posted by Alice Dreger http://www.alicedreger.com on December 30, 2009 at 10:16 AM
15
I meant "into." Sorry, I need an editor.
Posted by Alice Dreger http://www.alicedreger.com on December 30, 2009 at 10:18 AM
Bill W. 16
I could not agree more with some people here. This initiative IS real however it is tough to get something on the ballot in California unless you have lots of money.
It's very hard to argue against a humorous message. Notice that leaders in the religious right are just trying to ignore this issue but it continues to pick up steam. It's harder to confront this kind of humor head on.
Posted by Bill W. http://www.seattlegayscene.com on December 30, 2009 at 10:32 AM
Kat 17
What we NEED is for a senator to propose IN Congress a bill in which divorces in other states do not NEED to be recognized by other states.
Posted by Kat http://www.utopiatenation.com/blog on December 30, 2009 at 10:36 AM
18
This is the dumbest shit ever.
Posted by MT3 on December 30, 2009 at 10:44 AM
19
Dammit, these Onion™ styled posts got me again...lol...
Posted by MT3 on December 30, 2009 at 10:46 AM
20
Oh this is just so delicious that it MUST be fattening. :)
Posted by BrandonHilty on December 30, 2009 at 10:56 AM
very bad homo 21
@9: We will shut up when we are all treated equally. As per the Constitution of the USA.
Posted by very bad homo on December 30, 2009 at 11:45 AM
22
13
21
Lots of whiners but no takers...
Posted by I'm shocked- SHOCKED!..... on December 30, 2009 at 1:21 PM
COMTE 23
@22:

Get back to us when you actually have a bet worth taking...
Posted by COMTE http://www.chriscomte.com on December 30, 2009 at 1:40 PM
24
23
we'll call you know if a penny-a-point poker game starts
Posted by bigspender on December 30, 2009 at 1:42 PM
JunieGirl 25
Doug Manchester appears to be trying to AVOID a divorce, by getting a legal separation. It's the wife who's suing for divorce.

Not that that makes much difference in my book...it's still hypocritical.
Posted by JunieGirl on December 30, 2009 at 1:51 PM
COMTE 26
@24:

My game is blackjack, preferably single or double-deck only, $10 minimum, no limit.

8 times out of 10 I walk away on the upside.
Posted by COMTE http://www.chriscomte.com on December 30, 2009 at 3:13 PM
27
26 Garrison Keillor would be proud.
Posted by lawofaverages on December 30, 2009 at 5:35 PM
Uriel-238 28
You know, Allegedly (@22)* you like to dismiss this all as whining, but that doesn't make these gripes illegitimate.

At least we don't have an entire cable network devoted to whining on our behalf. Do we, Allegedly? How many do you have?

We're all grey iron here, Allegedly. Don't even try to imagine you're stainless. I think the term whining ups your crackpot index.

* Oh lookie! See, for the convenience of others, I'm numerically indexing your comments. All better now, Allegedly?
Posted by Uriel-238 on December 30, 2009 at 7:03 PM
29
28
sorry to see you so bitter and buttsore.
did they cancel your MTV?
bummer....
Posted by a Haikyu for Whiners on December 31, 2009 at 6:05 AM
30
28
grey iron?
I don't think so:

I'm titanium,
you're poo-
everything you say
bounces off of me
and sticks to you
Posted by ThankYou. ThankYouVeryMuch... on December 31, 2009 at 6:11 AM
31
28
we always thought of slog as a greywater kind of place
Posted by pleasedon'tforgettoflush on December 31, 2009 at 6:13 AM
Uriel-238 32
Wow, Allegedly (@29, 30, 31), I've never seen you so off your game.

I'd like to think I hit somewhere that stung. I suspect, though, it's just you're latest score was over-cut with rat poison. It's a hazard of the market, you know.
Posted by Uriel-238 on December 31, 2009 at 6:53 AM
COMTE 33
@27:

How ARE things down there at the bottom of the barrel? Keep scraping, I'm sure you'll come up with something real good...
Posted by COMTE http://www.chriscomte.com on December 31, 2009 at 12:36 PM
Uriel-238 34
Incidentally, Allegedly (@28), if you registered as Titanium, you wouldn't have to deal with me calling you Allegedly anymore.

And I'd cease attributing to you the comments from your less refined cohorts. I'm pretty sure this one is from you, though, Allegedly, considering the timestamps.
Posted by Uriel-238 on December 31, 2009 at 5:00 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy