Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Tuesday, December 29, 2009

Speaking of the Leaders of the GOP and Their Inability to Impose Their Own Values On Themselves

Posted by on Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 11:10 AM

Karl Rove—who helped get George W. Bush reelected by putting all those anti-gay-marriage/defense-of-traditional-marriage amendments on all those state ballots in 2004—just got divorced.

Karl Rove and his wife, Darby, were granted a divorce last week," said Perino. "The couple came to the decision mutually and amicably, and they maintain a close relationship and a strong friendship. There will be no further comment, and the family requests that its privacy be respected.”

Some families are more deserving of respect than others. Karl's (broken) family? Respect. My (intact) family? Attack.

UPDATE: Glenn Greenwald over at Salon writes...

Rove obtained his divorce under Texas' "no-fault" divorce law, one of the most permissive in the nation. That law basically allows any married couple to simply end their marriage because they feel like it. Texas, needless to say, is one of the states which has constitutionally barred same-sex marriages, and has a Governor who explicitly cites Christian dogma as the reason to support that provision, yet the overwhelming majority of Texan citizens make sure that there's nothing in the law making their own marriages binding or permanent—i.e., traditional. They're willing to limit other people's marriage choices on moral grounds, but not their own, and thus have a law that lets them divorce whenever the mood strikes. That's the very permissive, untraditional and un-Christian law that Rove just exploited in order to obtain his divorce.

There's debate and dispute among various Christian theologians and sects over whether divorce and re-marriage are permissible and, if so, under what circumstances. But what is clear is that the attribute of permanence is every bit as much of a part of "traditional marriage" as the need for a man and a women—hence, the vow before God of "till death do us part" and "that which God has brought together, let no man put asunder." The concept of "no-fault" divorce is certainly repugnant to most Christian and traditional understandings of marriage. Yet those like Rove who have devoted endless efforts to barring gay citizens from marrying on the ground that our laws must enshrine Christian concepts of "traditional marriage" continuously take advantage of laws that enable them to end their own marriages on a whim, and even enter new marriages with their so-called "second, third and fourth wives," which only seems to intensify their "traditional marriage" preaching.

Greenwald also points out that this was Rove's second marriage—and second no-fault divorce.

 

Comments (36) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
Rove loved using gay marriage as a wedge issue, taking every opportunity to exploit and exacerbate homophobia for votes. He also loved using the personal lives of his opponents as fodder for smear campaigns. And now he requests respect for his privacy? Ha ha ha ha ha.
Posted by John McCain's illegitmate black child on December 29, 2009 at 11:16 AM
2
This is Karl's 2nd divorce.

It was probably the Abstinence that did them in.

I'm sure he'll be come a regular now at the DC Eagle.
Posted by Jakey on December 29, 2009 at 11:19 AM
rara avis 3
the lack of cognitive dissonance in some people never ceases to astound me.
Posted by rara avis on December 29, 2009 at 11:41 AM
laterite 4
Dana Perino probably has the worst, most thankless job in the world: Bush family spokesperson. They must have a picture of her blowing 50 dudes or something.
Posted by laterite on December 29, 2009 at 11:42 AM
Vince 5
The cheapening of marriage by the people claiming the moral high ground should be no surprise. Morality is always for the other guy. It's just one of the reasons religion is such a farce.
Posted by Vince on December 29, 2009 at 11:46 AM
6
@3 Am I reading that wrong or are you suggesting that people should have MORE cognitive dissonance?
Posted by Ackham on December 29, 2009 at 12:18 PM
7
@6, if I understood correctly, yes, they should when faced with two incompatible ideas and don't see anything wrong with supporting both of them
Posted by sadini on December 29, 2009 at 12:27 PM
Will in Seattle 8
Obviously America-hating Republicants don't deserve to get married.

We should reserve that for stable couples, like ... gays.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on December 29, 2009 at 12:29 PM
elenchos 9
You know Karl Rove is an atheist too, right? This line of attack doesn't do anything to Republicans except help convince them that their party is a big tent.
Posted by elenchos on December 29, 2009 at 12:30 PM
10
The most astonishing thing is that Rove could ever get two separate women to marry him.
Posted by Nhaven1 on December 29, 2009 at 12:31 PM
11
Being the GOP, the only surprise here is that Rove's wife hadn't been in a disfiguring car accident or wasn't in a hospital bed dying of cancer when he divorced her.
Posted by bobbyjoe on December 29, 2009 at 12:33 PM
Timmytee 12
Isn't Rove gay? I know I read somewhere that he
frequents gay bars in D.C.
Posted by Timmytee on December 29, 2009 at 12:38 PM
Will in Seattle 13
@12 - no, that's GWB. I think Rove was just his wingman.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on December 29, 2009 at 12:47 PM
14
For every marriage license I can't get... Rove is getting two.
Posted by Smokes on December 29, 2009 at 12:48 PM
15
5/Vince: "The cheapening of marriage by the people claiming the moral high ground should be no surprise. Morality is always for the other guy. It's just one of the reasons religion is such a farce."

Contrary to that broad brush you're wielding, morality is not "always for the other guy." I'm sure there are plenty of religious people who are hypocrites, who oppose same-sex marriage on the (absurd) grounds of "protecting marriage" but then cheat on their spouses or abuse them. But I'm equally sure there are plenty of religious people don't cheat on their spouses, treat their spouses with love and respect, and have marriages that last. And there are, believe it or not, religious people who support same-sex marriage. In a couple posts on SLOG, I've referenced a Charles Blow column in the NY Times where he pointed out that one-third of Catholics and Protestants in California voted AGAINST Proposition 8.

Posted by Roma on December 29, 2009 at 12:49 PM
rara avis 16
@6 - i meant the comment in the way @7 explained it (thanks) - they seem utterly unaware of their incompatible values.
Posted by rara avis on December 29, 2009 at 12:50 PM
17
Re: the request for privacy -- I request the right to marry my husband legally in the United States. When they start respecting my requests, I'll start respecting theirs.
Posted by Basil Rathbone on December 29, 2009 at 1:00 PM
18
@16 - I was the one in need of correction - confusing symptoms and causes. Perhaps I had Orwell's "double-think" in mind. Apologies.
Posted by Ackham on December 29, 2009 at 1:05 PM
19
Mr. Rove, Jeff Gannon is on Line 1 . . .
Posted by Jerry on December 29, 2009 at 1:25 PM
20
Hey Dan,
I live in Austin, and Rove just moved into a house a few blocks away from me. We think he's here to help with Kay Bailey Hutchinson's campaign for governor. She's a really scary person, getting helped out by a really scary person. She's a lot more conservative on 'family issues' than our current sad-sack governor, Rick Perry, is. Just thought you'd be interested.
Posted by Austin Gal on December 29, 2009 at 1:25 PM
21
Frank Sinatra fathered 3 children yet was granted an annulment from his first wife to marry his fourth wife in the Catholic Church, so this really isn't that shocking.
Posted by step child on December 29, 2009 at 1:42 PM
Will in Seattle 22
@19 - I recommend posting Wanted posters in the neighborhood.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on December 29, 2009 at 1:43 PM
The Amazing Jim 23
He said "till death do us part." He's not dead yet.

On an up-note; Good afternoon Darby, I hear congratulations are in order.
Posted by The Amazing Jim http://www.facebook.com/home.php?#/profile.php?id=100000076496291&ref=profile on December 29, 2009 at 1:43 PM
michael strangeways 24
i can't imagine the horror of having to wake up every morning to see that fat, piggy little face staring back at me...

the horror.
Posted by michael strangeways http://www.seattlegayscene.com/ on December 29, 2009 at 2:11 PM
Nofo 25
Reading about Karl Rove doing ANYTHING is like watching a bulldog take a shit.
Posted by Nofo http://nofo.blogspot.com on December 29, 2009 at 2:19 PM
Chris in Vancouver WA 26
Not too different from Nevada where you can legally pay for straight sex, and get arrested for gay sex.
Posted by Chris in Vancouver WA on December 29, 2009 at 2:26 PM
27
red Rove-r, red Rove-r, have Karl bend over
Posted by step child on December 29, 2009 at 2:39 PM
Vince 28
@15 You quote me but then you act like you didn't read what I wrote. Sure there are people who have good marriages. And sure there are people who are moral. And as for religion, well, we'll just have to disagree.
Posted by Vince on December 29, 2009 at 3:10 PM
Vince 29
P.S. And in a rare example of the Bush Whitehouse being on target, G.W. called Rove "Turd Blossom".
Posted by Vince on December 29, 2009 at 3:13 PM
30
Vince, I did read what you wrote: "Morality is always for the other guy. It's just one of the reasons religion is such a farce."

You're asserting that one of the reasons religions is such a farce is that, for religious people, morality is always for the other guy.

I'm saying that assertion is simplistic and untrue.

Posted by Roma on December 29, 2009 at 3:40 PM
31
@25: But you're being unkind to the innocent Bulldog!
Posted by gayBoiNYC on December 29, 2009 at 5:14 PM
32
we LOVE it when the faggots start lecturing on Christian Values.
Posted by it's a HOOT on December 29, 2009 at 5:34 PM
33
Rove is likely homosexual. And that scene in Bush Family Fortunes with Kay Bailey as a reporter covering Bush's campaign--is a historical nugget!
Posted by reporting from Queen Anne on December 29, 2009 at 8:13 PM
34
Don't Karl Rove's children deserve a mother and a father?
Posted by Rawkcuf on December 29, 2009 at 10:47 PM
Knat 35
Trying to keep up and catalog each example of blatant GOP hypocrisy is like trying to catalog all the stars in the sky, and pick out one as the best example. After a while, there's just too many to choose from.

@4. Y'know, I've never thought about it in those terms, but you're probably right. And damn you for putting that image in my head. I've never become aroused when looking at her before, but you've probably made it so I never won't ever again.
Posted by Knat on December 30, 2009 at 2:57 AM
36
@4 "Thirty-seven!?"
Posted by Quinapalus on December 30, 2009 at 12:40 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy