Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Tuesday, December 15, 2009

Have You Watered Your Christmas Tree Lately?

Posted by on Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 3:47 PM

 

Comments (29) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
Could they do that with a turkey fryer in the same room? That'd be awesome.
Posted by dwight moody on December 15, 2009 at 3:49 PM
2
mythbusters called bs on this ish
Posted by pioneer on December 15, 2009 at 3:56 PM
3
'Cause mythbusters should be trusted way more then the National Institute of Standards, right?
For fuck's sake, I heard two morons in the elevator talking about Mythbusters yesterday:

Moron 1: Mythbusters said that to improve traction while driving in ice, you should drive backwards. Except the gain in traction is countered by the fact that it is harder for most people to drive backwards.

Moron 2: Well, that makes sense since the engine is in the front of the car and all.

That's when my brain finally leaked out my ear.
Posted by Avtar on December 15, 2009 at 4:11 PM
TheMisanthrope 4
Christmas Tree fires are often massive and pretty (due to the chemicals they spray on the tree).

The tree tends to burn in different colors, and goes up in a matter of seconds. It's almost like gasoline. And, they don't need much to start them burning either.

But they are warm. We used to collect the thrown out ones after Xmas.
Posted by TheMisanthrope on December 15, 2009 at 4:15 PM
5
Reverse is geared with more torque than 1st gear in most cars. Not sure why you're so bothered by mythbusters. Was your mother decapitated by a truck tire in slo-mo or something?
Posted by spave on December 15, 2009 at 4:15 PM
Sargon Bighorn 6
#5 OMG that's how MY mother died!
Posted by Sargon Bighorn on December 15, 2009 at 4:19 PM
7
Fa la la la La, La la la la!
Posted by Jonathank5 on December 15, 2009 at 4:19 PM
Will in Seattle 8
@3 - driving backwards is the same as using 1st gear or 2nd gear instead of D for automatic. Which is one of the first things you learn when you learn how to drive in ice and snow, other than not tailgating or making sharp turns ....

See that neat little 1 or 2 next to the D? Use that instead.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on December 15, 2009 at 4:22 PM
9
@8: I know, that's why I thought those two were morons. Durrrh.
Posted by Avtar on December 15, 2009 at 4:38 PM
10
@3.5-9: Automatic? Well there's your problem right there.
Posted by dwight moody on December 15, 2009 at 4:40 PM
11
@8 sorry, i gotta disagree.

1 or 2 simply holds the transmission in that gear. The only thing you're doing is preventing the transmission from shifting. One could argue that the increased torque (relative to the lower gears) of 1 or 2 would actually increase the chances of breaking traction when driving on snow- since an important aspect of snow driving is gentle, controlled inputs.
Posted by happy renter on December 15, 2009 at 4:46 PM
Norbeck 12
Did this give anyone else a good belly laugh? I haven't laughed out loud at anything on the slog for quite a while.
Posted by Norbeck on December 15, 2009 at 4:46 PM
Whiskey Tango Foxtrot 13
Using hairspray as an accelerant, my ex and I did do this (outside!) last year with our tree when it was old and dry -- about January 5th, I think. We were drunk. Hilarity ensued.
Posted by Whiskey Tango Foxtrot http://lifetimesshortnow.blogspot.com on December 15, 2009 at 4:46 PM
Will in Seattle 14
It's just Seattle Syndrome. Some people don't know how to drive in snow and ice around here. They drive their 4WD Tahoe to the grocery store 3 blocks away and panic if their 6 inch heels get wet.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on December 15, 2009 at 4:47 PM
Will in Seattle 15
@13 - yeah, but the ash it leaves really makes a mess.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on December 15, 2009 at 4:48 PM
hartiepie 16
@2 --- Mythbusters tested if too many lights could cause a fire, but not other sources (electric etc). In the US, about 300 tree fires annually cause 10 deaths and 40 severe injuries.

This clip doesn't say how the fire was started.

Posted by hartiepie on December 15, 2009 at 4:55 PM
17
I've burned a lot of dry pine in my time, and the needles do indeed go up like magic. We'd always toss the tree onto a bonfire in the summer, it'd be good for 20 seconds of entertainment.
Posted by dwight moody on December 15, 2009 at 4:58 PM
COMTE 18
@14:

Those people are from either Southern CA or the greater Phoenix area...
Posted by COMTE http://www.chriscomte.com on December 15, 2009 at 4:59 PM
19
Look on the bright side. In the olden days, real candles were used on the tree.
Posted by keshmeshi on December 15, 2009 at 5:02 PM
Will in Seattle 20
@16 - usually the fire is not so much from the lights (which if LED don't give off much heat) but from the outlet that was overloaded and which had dried pine resin drip into it, that then causes the fire which hungrily devours the dried pine needles and sets the drapes and other items on fire.

Or a spark from the fireplace, but you don't see that as much here in the city, since most people don't use wood.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on December 15, 2009 at 5:02 PM
21
Can't wait to burn trees after xmas. Bike trailer, booze, xmas trees, beach of unknown origin... party.
Posted by DRUNKEL on December 15, 2009 at 5:13 PM
22
@19 The more I think about that, the more insaane it becomes. How is it all of our ancestors weren't horrifically burned up in tree fires?
Posted by UNPAID COMMENTER on December 15, 2009 at 5:17 PM
23
@22: Perhaps this will answer your question.
Posted by Proteus on December 15, 2009 at 5:51 PM
Enigma 24
@16 That's what I remember. Also, when they did the final destruction at the end of the ep I believe they had a result very much like this video. So, too many lights on a tree will not start a fire,but a tree fire will go out of control quickly and can do some serious damage.
Posted by Enigma http://approvereferendum71.org/ on December 15, 2009 at 6:01 PM
TVDinner 25
I love the NIST. When my math professor insisted we memorize the square root algorithm (because THAT'S gonna come in handy one day) but failed to actually explain it, I found it neatly elucidated on their website. Thanks for the 4.0, NIST!
Posted by TVDinner http:// on December 15, 2009 at 8:21 PM
26
Conjecture, fools. Nobody in Seattle knows how to drive on fucking ice.
Posted by cave troll on December 15, 2009 at 9:12 PM
More, I Say! 27
C'mon dudes, unlike other places where snow is far more common (Chicago, maybe, or Ellensburg even?) it is much flatter, and the snow is drier - powdery, if you will. It's waaaay easier to drive through that than it is to try and get your car up a goddamn ice luge while it pours a massive icee down from heaven. I don't even have a car, and yet I find myself defending the Intrepid Seattle Snow-Driver.
Posted by More, I Say! on December 16, 2009 at 9:35 AM
STJA 28
This is why I pick Balsam Fir.
Posted by STJA on December 16, 2009 at 12:05 PM
STJA 29
@3 - The reason for driving backwards when you're having trouble on ice has to do with weight. If you have front wheel drive, and you're spinning your tires trying to get over the top of the hill, it's because there's no weight over the tires. If you turn around, you place the weight of the engine just a bit more over the tires, and they bite better.

The only reason I am willing to plug this is that I've had it work, twice. Going up forwards had us spinning at the top, just not quite able to get make it, while going backward was no problem.
Posted by STJA on December 16, 2009 at 12:09 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy