First, some analysis from Matthew Yglesias:
Looks like Joe Lieberman decided to try for the old double-cross and say he now opposes the Medicare expansion compromise he’d hinted he would support. Lieberman wants no public option, no trigger that might create a public option, and no expansion of existing programs as a substitute for a public option. And he doesn’t care about expressing that view in misleading ways, timed to cause embarrassment to the Democratic leadership.... [But] the real story here is that the Senate leadership has, at every step of this process, underscored that a “reconciliation” path to a health care bill is off the table. That means Lieberman has unlimited control over what happens, and no incentive to compromise, so it shouldn’t surprise anyone that he’s being uncompromising.
Voters in Connecticut support the public option by wide margins. We don't need any more pansy-assed liberal "vigils." What we need, Connecticut voters, are a few Florida-in-2000/teabaggers-at-the-gates style riots. Connecticut voters—the folks who inflicted Joe Lieberman on us in the first place—should head to Lieberman's offices in Connecticut and Washington D.C. and shut 'em down. And the Democratic leadership needs to fucking strip Lieberman of his chairmanship already. Consequences, consequences.
3
10
Comments (11) RSS