Slog

News & Arts

Line Out

Music & Nightlife

Friday, December 4, 2009

Increase in Younger Voters in Mayor's Race

Posted by Eli Sanders on Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 3:59 PM

The Stranger requested a bunch of data from King County Elections in order to figure out what the heck happened in November, and while we're still playing around with what we received, our first cut at the data shows a jump in participation by younger voters in the 2009 mayor's race (as compared to the 2005 mayor's race).

Click on the chart to enlarge it. Voter age is across the bottom, and total votes cast runs up the left side:

VoteComp.gif
  • The Stranger

Granted, almost all age groups showed increased participation in 2009 over 2005. That's most likely because this was a more exciting election (Mallahan vs. McGinn, etc.) than the election four years ago (Nickels vs. Runte, etc).

However, those supposedly unreliable younger voters (which we're defining for now as voters aged 18 to 35) increased their participation more significantly than the next cohort of voters (aged 36 to 53).

And, when compared to the always-reliable older voters (aged 54 to 71), younger voters increased their participation by close to the same amount.

Full chart—comparing voter turnout for all age groups of Seattle voters in 2005 and 2009—is below. More charts and data as we (meaning, mainly, The Stranger's Nat Irons) crunch more numbers.

VoteComp2.gif
  • The Stranger

In pie chart form here.

Share via

 

Comments (13) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
Mattini 1
I see those 100+ year olds didn't turn out for the vote. Such voter apathy in that age group.
Posted by Mattini on December 4, 2009 at 4:03 PM
Will in Seattle 2
@1 -they're lazy.

That said, it shows that turnout of all voters is why McGinn won, instead of the traditional strategery of focus on 3/4 voters that Mallahamsters did.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on December 4, 2009 at 4:16 PM
3
Dear The Stranger who is putting this together,

Please revise the graphs to represent # of votes cast per # of registered voters in each age group. That will present a clearer picture and remove demographic shifts between 05 and 09 from the picture.

Love,
me
Posted by fdsahjtbererdsgafhj on December 4, 2009 at 4:30 PM
4 Comment Pulled (Spam) Comment Policy
Lurleen 5
Interesting to see the three peaks from 2005 shift 4 years to the right.

@3 is right - your raw numbers don't control for potential changes in voter population sizes for each age class.
Posted by Lurleen http://pamshouseblend.com/userDiary.do?personId=173 on December 4, 2009 at 4:45 PM
Will in Seattle 6
@4 - only if Hell freezes over and they escape.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on December 4, 2009 at 4:50 PM
7
Can you post the source data, too?
Posted by barzen on December 4, 2009 at 5:02 PM
8
Actually, I'd like to see the 2005 numbers shifted over 4 years so they represented the same voters. Then you'd see that turnout among the >50 cohort didn't change much, but turnout among those <50 increased dramatically.
Posted by F on December 4, 2009 at 5:03 PM
Will in Seattle 9
People move. Especially younger voters, @8. Turnover in the areas that voted McGinn is a lot higher than in the areas that voted Mallahan. Partially due to age, partially due to nature of the groups.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on December 4, 2009 at 5:16 PM
10
From that graph it looks like the increase in voting among 92 year olds was greater than the increase among 22 year olds. If that is true, what does it say about young voters?
Posted by ratcityreprobate on December 4, 2009 at 7:25 PM
11
From that graph it looks like the increase in voting among 92 year olds was greater than the increase among 22 year olds. If that is true, what does it say about young voters?
Posted by ratcityreprobate on December 4, 2009 at 7:25 PM
Timrrr 12
I agree -- for a real comparision you need to shift the 2005 numbers up by 4 years to get a better representation of actual change in turnout by the same people who were perhaps more apathetic or less activated by politics formerly.

(And then things like the weird little peaks of 58 & 35 year olds in 2005 would line up nicely with the corresponding spikes in the 2009 data at 62 & 39, respectively.)
Posted by Timrrr on December 5, 2009 at 12:19 PM
mrbombit 13
Are you telling me that McGinn won. I had no idea. The SLOG must have missed it. Good fraking grief.
Posted by mrbombit on December 5, 2009 at 5:00 PM

Add a comment


 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use