Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Thursday, December 3, 2009

Public Preference: Public Option

Posted by on Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 10:19 AM

Sixty percent of Americans want Congress to create a government-run health insurance provider to compete with the private racket firms (voting begins in the Senate today)... but they don't think it's going to make difference in the quality of health care. Thomson Reuters released the results of a poll today:

* Believe in public option: 59.9 percent yes, 40.1 percent no.

* 86 percent of Democrats support the public option versus 57 percent of Independents and 33 percent of Republicans.

* Quality of healthcare will be better 12 months from now: 35 percent strongly disagree. 11.6 percent strongly agree. 29.9 percent put themselves in the middle.

* Believe the amount of money spent on health care will be less 12 months from now: 52 percent strongly disagree, 13 percent strongly agree.

* 23 percent believe it will be easier for people to receive the care they need a year from now.

You're have to be mad to believe that health insurance is best handled entirely by the private market. Of course, I'd argue that at least 40 percent of Americans are on the brink of totally nuts.

 

Comments (14) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
Max Solomon 1
not nuts - willfully ignorant. you can't educate them on this issue - they won't listen. and many of them have shit for insurance, or none.
Posted by Max Solomon on December 3, 2009 at 10:23 AM
Asparagus! 2
You'd also have to be mad to believe that congress gives a shit what people think unless it falls in line with the stream of money, then they're all populists.
Posted by Asparagus! on December 3, 2009 at 10:47 AM
this guy I know in Spokane 3
Considering the rate at which these things move, I'd be surprised if any change of any kind has gone into effect within only 12 months.
Posted by this guy I know in Spokane on December 3, 2009 at 10:51 AM
gloomy gus 4
This American Life's late-November show "Someone Else's Money" convinced me the "public option" ain't all that, certainly not in the ridiculous shape it's taken now, and carries unintended negative consequences that outweigh by a mile any accidental benefit.

It's become no more than a sop to stave off single-payer.
Posted by gloomy gus on December 3, 2009 at 10:58 AM
5
Fuck you.
Posted by Mr. Poe on December 3, 2009 at 11:17 AM
Julie in Eugene 6
@4 – I’m pretty sure that’s all it ever was, right? Before the ’08 election, Paul Krugman was basically saying that single payer is the best approach, but it’ll never happen. So, here’s an incredibly complicated work-around (public option + some other things) that mimics single payer but hopefully won’t scare the “OMG Socialism!” crowd too much.

The way I see it, single payer is the ideal, but it’s not politically viable (because Americans have this weird hang-up around anything smelling of socialism – right up until the time that a program is implemented, and then just try to reduce or take away their Social Security or Medicare benefits). Though, I haven’t seen polling on single payer in awhile (I notice this survey didn’t ask the question). Not that it really matters since most Americans probably don’t understand single payer vs. public option vs. what we have now. Blegh.
Posted by Julie in Eugene on December 3, 2009 at 11:22 AM
Will in Seattle 7
If the America-hating Republic Party of No can cripple it, they will.

We all know that - and given all the money going to both parties to do just that and ignore what the vast majority of American citizens want, we expect that's what we'll get.

Doesn't matter to me - I can retire to Canada and pay $42 a month for the best health care in the world while you starve like animals.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on December 3, 2009 at 11:23 AM
8
@3,

Unless something's changed recently, I'm pretty sure the plan doesn't take full effect until 2013.
Posted by keshmeshi on December 3, 2009 at 11:57 AM
giffy 9
Of course the problem is not the cost of health insurance but health care. Its not like insurance companies are making obscene profits. Doctors are. The fault lies in the crazy costs of health care delivery.

We just pay the insurance companies so that is the focus of our anger.
Posted by giffy on December 3, 2009 at 11:58 AM
10
Dominic, have you ever worked in the health care field? Ever run a business and met a payroll and paid for insurance for a dozen employees? Ever done anything but bitch and whine?
Have a joint.
STFU.
Posted by Real World in Seattle on December 3, 2009 at 12:17 PM
11
Maybe the 40% against are the people who currently get their healthcare from the government. They have nothing to gain from a public option.
Posted by CG on December 3, 2009 at 12:33 PM
Will in Seattle 12
For the most part they are, @11. Medicare, Medicaid, and VA benefits comprise about 90 percent of those protesting against allowing us hard-working Americans to get single payer national health care, because they're already ON socialized medicine.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on December 3, 2009 at 12:42 PM
Urgutha Forka 13
The private market is best for providing things we want, but don't need, like bubblegum, cadillacs, and vacation packages.

The private market isn't so great for providing things we need, but don't like to think about, like prisons, the military, and caring for the sick.
Posted by Urgutha Forka on December 3, 2009 at 1:23 PM
14
What a ridiculous interpretation. There is no way a public option would kick in 12 months from now. People are being sensible and not expecting changes that fast.
Posted by sf gal on December 3, 2009 at 1:57 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy