Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Thursday, December 3, 2009

Lunch Date: Interfictions 2

Posted by on Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 11:57 AM

(Once in a while, I take a new book with me to lunch and give it a half an hour or so to grab my attention. Lunch Date is my judgment on that speed-dating experience.)

interfictions.jpg
Who's your date today? Interfictions 2: An Anthology of Interstitial Writing, edited by Delia Sherman and Christopher Barzac.

Where'd you go? Zhivago's Café (Bethany made it sound so good!)

What'd you eat? I had a broccoli and potato piroshki ($4.95) and the borscht ($3.99).

How was the food? I know that this is hard to believe, but I thought this piroshki was better than the ones they used to serve at the delightful piroshki place at Broadway and John. The filling had more flavor, and the dough was perfect—not too moist, not too heavy. I was not so crazy about the borscht, however: I like my borscht to be beety. I also missed being alternately chastised and fawned over by older Russian ladies, so I'll keep going back to Piroshki on Madison, too. But I'm so glad to have good piroshki back on Broadway.

What does your date say about itself? It's an anthology. "Interstitial fiction. It's all about breaking rules, ignoring boundaries, cross-pollinating the fields of literature. It's about working between, across, at, and through the edges and borders of literary genres. It falls between the cracks of other movements, terms, and definitions. These are stories to surprise us—stories showing us that literature holds possibilities we'd never imagined..."

Is there a representative quote? Well, since it's an anthology, no. But here's the opening paragraph to "Remembrance Is Something Like a House" by Will Ludwigsen: "Every day for three decades, the abandoned house strains against its galling anchors, hoping to pull free. It has waited thirty years for its pipes and pilings to finally decay so it can leave for Florida to find the Macek family."

Will you two end up in bed together? Yes. Thus far, it's a really fun, intelligent anthology. But I don't necessarily understand the difference between Interstitial Fiction and science fiction. I understand that these are smart stories about the fantastic that aren't, say, a series of tremendously thick fantasy books based on a Dungeons and Dragons campaign the author ran twenty years ago, but the movement seems ill-defined. Isn't it enough to say that this is one of the smartest, most forward-thinking collections of sci-fi stories to be published this year and leave it at that?

 

Comments (8) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
starsandgarters 1
Freaky, I was just at Zhivago's Cafe last night. Also an enjoyable experience.
Posted by starsandgarters on December 3, 2009 at 1:00 PM
2
"Interstitial Fiction" is much more annoying than "Speculative Fiction" as new names for Scifi/Fantasy go.
Posted by dwight moody on December 3, 2009 at 1:04 PM
3
I'm glad you got off the pork kick on your lunch dates...that shit will kill you.
Posted by j.lee on December 3, 2009 at 1:13 PM
4
I think the point of interstitial/speculative/etc fiction is just to get around people who think sci-fi = Star Trek. You're a book guy - you know how much publishers/booksellers, at least, if not the reading public, need to stick every book in a category, no matter how much they stretch the definitions.

Delia Sherman's wife, Eileen Kushner, for example, wrote the amazing "Swordspoint". It might be set in an imaginary place - so you can't quite call it historical fiction - but it's not really fair to lump it in with elves-dwarves-and-barbarians style fantasy.
Posted by SeaExile on December 3, 2009 at 1:24 PM
5
Sounds like slipstream fiction to me.
Posted by mint chocolate chip on December 3, 2009 at 1:44 PM
6
@4- What always bugged me about SciFi as a label was that Science often had very, very little to do with it. A lot of the best "Science Fiction" just tells science to go fuck itself. For example, in the original Star Wars movies The Force is basically magic. Then in the Prequals they put in that bullshit about the Force microbe that was intensely lame. Star Trek always got bogged down in trying to explain the science behind their ridiculousness. The "Science Fiction" label should just go to stuff that actually tries to deal with real physics, like maybe The Forever War. It's a tiny collection of writing that actually fits.
Posted by dwight moody on December 3, 2009 at 2:22 PM
7
Just because something isn't Domestic Realism (or History or Memoir), why does it have to be a subset of Sci-Fi? The point of Interstitial is that it could partake of any genre - yet belongs to none.
Posted by eileenK on December 3, 2009 at 7:22 PM
8
I like the term "speculative fiction". It's more accurate than "science fiction" -- as Mr. Moody points out, many sci-fi narratives don't belong in the same room with the word "science" -- and way less pretentious than "interstitial fiction." Seriously, interstitial? The last time I came across the word "interstice" it was in reference to overly intellectualized doofuses who couldn't come up with the colloquial word for "a small opening" (gap) and kept shouting "interstice! interstice!"

Hey, maybe if the term "speculative fiction" takes off, Comcast channel 59 could rebrand itself as SpekFik!
Posted by Kalakalot on December 4, 2009 at 8:39 AM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy