Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Wednesday, December 2, 2009

Meet the New Capitol Hill Logo!

Posted by on Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 10:38 AM

caphill_logo.jpg

Created for the Capitol Hill Chamber of Commerce by the Bellevue ad firm Kite. From the official press release:

The brand strategy and visual design convey key themes that came up in the research and are part of the overall brand including: inclusivity, energy, diversity and dynamism. The idea behind the design is to visually represent the spirit of the socially inclusive and multi-faceted community by creating a solid background with the name "Capitol Hill" repeated many times.

How does the new Capitol Hill logo make you feel?

 

Comments (127) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
Honestly, it kind of makes me feel nauseous. The mish mash... the color... meh. I'm not liking it.

*shrug*
Posted by Phelix on December 2, 2009 at 10:42 AM
kk in seattle 2
This makes me feel like I've had a couple of quadruple venti Americanos.
Posted by kk in seattle on December 2, 2009 at 10:42 AM
DOUG. 3
At least they spelled it right.
Posted by DOUG. http://www.dougsvotersguide.com on December 2, 2009 at 10:43 AM
4
This look like crap wtf
Posted by nitsua on December 2, 2009 at 10:43 AM
TheMisanthrope 5
@1 That was my thought. Nauseous. It is nauseating, reminding me of somebody finger spelling 'capitol hill' in a pool of someone's vomit.
Posted by TheMisanthrope on December 2, 2009 at 10:45 AM
6
It makes me feel like more Risperdal®.
Posted by basketweaver on December 2, 2009 at 10:46 AM
7
I'm with #1. Why isn't nauseous one of my 5 options?
Posted by PDX_Paulie on December 2, 2009 at 10:46 AM
baconpussy 8
Once, my printer jet got stuck, and made something that looked EXACTLY like this...
Posted by baconpussy on December 2, 2009 at 10:48 AM
I'm 85 Years Old 9
When can I move into these "Capitol Hill" condos?
Posted by I'm 85 Years Old on December 2, 2009 at 10:48 AM
raindrop 10
Makes me feel crowded and cluttered.
Posted by raindrop on December 2, 2009 at 10:50 AM
11
Were I just walking by on the street, I wouldn't think much of it. Asked to critique, design nerd in me rather hates it.

Things I like: solid background created by overlapping letters, font, lower case.

Things I don't like: color, the solid parts aren't solid (floaty bits of darker color inside the c p and o) and there's a huge missed opportunity in the transition from rounded letters in 'capitol' to upright letters in 'hill'.
Posted by lyric on December 2, 2009 at 10:51 AM
Simac 12
I get the idea they're going for, which isn't bad, but visually this logo is very high school. Wouldn't it have made more sense to hold some kind of competition from the legions of creative folks who live on Capitol Hill rather than outsource it to people who live in Bellevue? Weak.
Posted by Simac on December 2, 2009 at 10:51 AM
nipper 13
This makes me less regretful that I moved to Ballard in the '90s.
Posted by nipper on December 2, 2009 at 10:51 AM
Simone 14
If I remember from my graphic design classes the Kerning between the a, p, i are different. Now to me that can be nit picking the logo to death but if one is doing an all type logo get the spacing right.

Actually, looking closer there's more spacing inconsistencies than military intelligence.
Posted by Simone on December 2, 2009 at 10:51 AM
meggers 15
It's awful, but I doubt I'll ever see it again. What is the logo used for, anyway? Was there a previous logo?

If anything, it's loads better than this piece of crap:

http://caphillchamber.org/

Posted by meggers on December 2, 2009 at 10:52 AM
16
Could you add "Bilious" to the choices? It looks like Sam I Am threw up his Green Eggs and Ham.

"Capitol Hill: it makes you ill!"
Posted by Smartypants on December 2, 2009 at 10:52 AM
Partly Cloudy 17
That's really awful. An ad firm "designed" this? I know third graders who can whip up something better than this in MS Paint.
Posted by Partly Cloudy on December 2, 2009 at 10:53 AM
18
@5,

So it's perfect!
Posted by keshmeshi on December 2, 2009 at 10:54 AM
19
Obsessive Compulsive Copy Paste Design Disorder
Obsessive Compulsive Copy Paste Design Disorder
Obsessive Compulsive Copy Paste Design Disorder
Obsessive Compulsive Copy Paste Design Disorder
Obsessive Compulsive Copy Paste Design Disorder
Obsessive Compulsive Copy Paste Design Disorder
Obsessive Compulsive Copy Paste Design Disorder
Posted by yawp on December 2, 2009 at 10:55 AM
Original-er Andy 20
This is what happens when an amateur designer is cycling through fonts and has them all piled up on top of each other and that goes... wait, that doesn't look so bad.

Sadly it does. Every graphic designer has probably seen something like this on their screen. The good ones choose to move on.
Posted by Original-er Andy on December 2, 2009 at 10:55 AM
21
epileptic
Posted by cornballer on December 2, 2009 at 10:56 AM
danindowntown 22
I would be curious to see what the other logos the firm came up with looked like, the ones the chamber rejected. My guess is this wasn't the agency's top pick. If it was the chamber wasted thousands of dollars.

And why couldn't they hire a Seattle firm? There are plenty of ad agencies, design houses, and branding companies in the CITY OF SEATTLE where Capitol Hill is located.

Fuck Bellevue.
Posted by danindowntown on December 2, 2009 at 10:58 AM
Cracker Jack 23
capitol hill -- we don't need no stinking capitals!

It's just a mess. It says nothing about any aspect of the Capitol Hill community, with the possible exception of street vomit. Awful.
Posted by Cracker Jack on December 2, 2009 at 10:59 AM
24
The font was a terrible choice.

Why wouldn't Capitol Hill Chamber of Commerce hire a designer/firm from their neighborhood instead of outsourcing to Bellevue?
Posted by Sye Indiscust on December 2, 2009 at 11:00 AM
David Schmader 25
Here is the whole of the press release:

KITE HELPS CAPITOL HILL REVEAL NEW BRAND

The Community’s New Brand Platform and Logo Embraces and Promotes What is Unique About One of Seattle’s Most Diverse Neighborhoods.

SEATTLE – December 1, 2009 – Kite Inc., a full-service brand strategy and design firm, today unveiled a new brand identity for Seattle’s Capitol Hill neighborhood. After a thorough research process, including interviews with local organizations, businesses, and residents in Capitol Hill and other Seattle neighborhoods, Kite worked with the Capitol Hill Chamber of Commerce to develop a brand platform to represent the community – a foundation from which to promote and market the neighborhood. The brand reflects this diverse and energetic community, embracing the distinct elements that make Capitol Hill one of the most unique and popular neighborhoods of Seattle.

“The new brand strategy and identity represents the neighborhood, and is the result of community organizations working together,” said Jack Hilovsky, executive director of the Capitol Hill Chamber of Commerce. “Kite created a brand platform and message foundation reflective of the vibrant culture and diversity found within Capitol Hill. The new positioning and look will be used to endorse activities and communications that key groups undertake, and establish stronger connections with residents and visitors as we continue building on these positive elements of our neighborhood.”

One of the primary goals of the project, part of a comprehensive 5-year strategic marketing communications plan, is the promotion of Capitol Hill as a shopping, dining and entertainment destination. Kite’s approach to both the brand positioning and new logo was to make sure that the strengths of the community, including its diversity and strong arts culture, meaningfully connects to the needs of its residents. The research uncovered that Capitol Hill, perhaps more than any other neighborhood in Seattle, provided residents and visitors a distinctive and alternative experience.

“The research uncovered several unique elements that people cherish about Capitol Hill and that aren’t found in other neighborhoods in Seattle,” said Mary Weisnewski, principal of Kite. “A brand must meaningfully connect to all of its stakeholders which in this case are the residents and business of Capitol Hill and the Seattle area. One of the challenges is that there are multiple areas within the neighborhood boundaries that are different and distinct. The final solution needed to reveal the thread that pulls them all together. “

The brand strategy and visual design convey key themes that came up in the research and are part of the overall brand including: inclusivity, energy, diversity and dynamism. The idea behind the design is to visually represent the spirit of the socially inclusive and multi-faceted community by creating a solid background with the name "Capitol Hill" repeated many times.

Kite Inc. is a Bellevue-based full-service brand strategy, graphic and interactive design firm that serves an array of companies and organizations large and small, across diverse industries including professional services, healthcare, financial services, technology, consumer, business-to-business and nonprofit. Kite’s services include brand strategy development, and graphic and interactive design. More information about the firm can be found online at www.kitebrandstudio.com .
More...
Posted by David Schmader on December 2, 2009 at 11:03 AM
26
"Diverse"? Yeah, a whole bunch of different letters piled on top of eachother, in the same color, becoming a single undifferentiated mass. Diverse.

@11: I assumed it was actually monochrome, and the floaty bits were a compression/anti-aliasing artifact ...
Posted by SeaExile on December 2, 2009 at 11:04 AM
27
Makes me feel like they couldn't come up with a good design and instead came up with a bunch of bullshit symbolism.
Posted by Kyleen on December 2, 2009 at 11:06 AM
br@d 28
Phoebe's friends are from the West Edge.
Posted by br@d on December 2, 2009 at 11:07 AM
Fifty-Two-Eighty 29
Can someone please explain to me how you can have a "Capitol Hill" without a capitol?
Posted by Fifty-Two-Eighty http://www.nra.org on December 2, 2009 at 11:08 AM
DowntownTaylor 30
How on earth does a solid background with the same thing repeated many times "visually represent the spirit of the socially inclusive and multi-faceted community"?? It doesn't.

This is awful. Not creative at all. The color sucks. The font is boring. The "solid" inside has little chicken scratch gaps that should have been filled in.

With all the creatives on Capitol Hill, why outsource to BELLEVUE of all places?! WTF?
Posted by DowntownTaylor http://www.digitaltaylor.com on December 2, 2009 at 11:08 AM
31
it's not easy being green.
Posted by texan on December 2, 2009 at 11:10 AM
meanie 32
I love that a bellevue firm created a hip new logo.
Posted by meanie http://www.spicealley.net on December 2, 2009 at 11:13 AM
33
Branding has never equaled a logo. They miss the point.
Posted by andre on December 2, 2009 at 11:14 AM
danindowntown 34
@ 29 From Wikipedia:

The origin of the neighborhood's name is disputed. According to one story, James A. Moore, the real estate developer who platted much of the area, named it thus in the hope that the Washington government would move to Seattle from Olympia. According to another, Moore named it after the Capitol Hill neighborhood of Denver, Colorado, his wife's hometown. It is thought by the editors of HistoryLink that the true story is a combination of the two.

Posted by danindowntown on December 2, 2009 at 11:14 AM
35
Hate the font, hate the color, hate the all-lowercase, hate the whole thing. Hate it. I'm embarassed.
Posted by jen on December 2, 2009 at 11:14 AM
Will in Seattle 36
Where's the box for "turned off"?
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on December 2, 2009 at 11:16 AM
DOUG. 37
"A brand must meaningfully connect to all of its stakeholders..." UGH.
Posted by DOUG. http://www.dougsvotersguide.com on December 2, 2009 at 11:16 AM
COMTE 38
As @15 points out, it's definitely an improvement over the previous logo, but just barely - and that's not saying much.

I'm afraid to ask how much they paid for this "rebranding consultation" because it looks like something that was knocked out in about two minutes using a low-end paintbox program.

Anticipating another press release from CHCC in about two years touting a "new, improved, better-than-before" re-rebranding that will look only slightly better than this.
Posted by COMTE http://www.chriscomte.com on December 2, 2009 at 11:16 AM
39
5280, Back when Washington was a wee baby state, we had some arguments about where the capitol should actually be. The guy who owned/developed the neighborhood named it Capitol Hill in the hopes that the actual state capitol would be moved there.
Posted by lily on December 2, 2009 at 11:17 AM
briboz 40
whaaaaaaaaaaaat? this is so miserable it makes me itchy. lazy non-concept, blind kerning, 90s-ass lower case and lame bellevue NW green. i can dig the idea that texture and fine detail in a logo are breakable rules, but doing so with unconsidered tiny white negative-space confetti? you're an asshole, kite. a blind asshole! haha
Posted by briboz on December 2, 2009 at 11:18 AM
Simone 41
This is exactly like a class exercise where you just have one or two fonts and have to come up with several different type based logos.

And that's all it is. It's crap and the design press release is way too wordy. Imho pretentious. And why is almost every word in the first sentence of the press release capitalized?
Posted by Simone on December 2, 2009 at 11:21 AM
Rotten666 42
Game over man. Welcome to Queen Anne East.

All that is left is Columbia City, Hillman City and Georgetown.
Posted by Rotten666 on December 2, 2009 at 11:26 AM
Simone 43
Oh and the designer should have at least filled in the little center white dotes with the green
Posted by Simone on December 2, 2009 at 11:26 AM
44
it sucks
major
Posted by so it's perfect! on December 2, 2009 at 11:27 AM
john t 45
Graphic designers often lament the client who says, "You want me to pay how much?! Hell, I'll just have my nephew do it, he's pretty clever with the Photoshop." In this case, the client wasn't bluffing.
Posted by john t on December 2, 2009 at 11:27 AM
46
Where's the option of "marketed-to"??
Posted by Faber on December 2, 2009 at 11:27 AM
Fnarf 47
"one of the most unique and popular neighborhoods". Yikes.

"Provided residents and visitors a distinctive and alternative experience" of searching for the interesting shops that used to be there but have all been replaced by "for lease" signs and nail salons.

"a brand platform and message foundation". My nutsack just retracted in horror. I'm sorry, but "brand positioning" is something that evil does; nothing of value in human history has ever been "brand positioned". Sounds perfect for the completely invisible and useless Chamber of Commerce.

I assume there will be banners hanging from the light poles soon? Inclusive, diverse faux-Victorian light poles, one hopes.
Posted by Fnarf http://www.facebook.com/fnarf on December 2, 2009 at 11:31 AM
Geni 48
Do.Not.Like.
Posted by Geni on December 2, 2009 at 11:33 AM
49
So whatever happened to that metronatural branding campaign from a few years back?
Posted by wiggly on December 2, 2009 at 11:37 AM
DavidG 50
@12 - Ditto. BELLEVUE? They outsourced Capitol Hill's image to BELLEVUE? What, they couldn't find enough designers on the Hill?
Posted by DavidG http://portableshrines.com on December 2, 2009 at 11:37 AM
DOUG. 51
According to their website, Ellen Forney sits on the Chamber's Board of Directors. Perhaps she could've been consulted...
Posted by DOUG. http://www.dougsvotersguide.com on December 2, 2009 at 11:45 AM
Aaron Huffman 52
Seriously, CHCC? I hope you got that shit cheap.
Posted by Aaron Huffman on December 2, 2009 at 11:50 AM
treacle 53
Frenetic.
Posted by treacle on December 2, 2009 at 11:58 AM
54
Must have been a pro-bono job.
Posted by Westside forever on December 2, 2009 at 12:11 PM
Fnarf 55
Logos don't matter.
Posted by Fnarf http://www.facebook.com/fnarf on December 2, 2009 at 12:13 PM
56
Makes me angry.
Posted by dwight moody on December 2, 2009 at 12:16 PM
57
There are some of the best designers in the country on Capitol Hill, so of course they looked to some lame-ass brand consultancy in Bellevue for this.
Posted by 311_TruthMovement on December 2, 2009 at 12:18 PM
Enigma 58
I haven't read through all the comments, cause I wanted to add my first impression without other input. But I quite like it. With the layering of the words it reminds me of the varying levels of the hill topography. The feel of the logo evokes Urban to me. It actually kind of feels like a t.v. show logo, something that would feature hipsters in a soap opera like dynamic. Because of the nature of the hill, I would of course add in some anarchists, urban ag people, and the gays to add flavor.
Posted by Enigma http://approvereferendum71.org/ on December 2, 2009 at 12:21 PM
59
As a designer, I'm all for designers not being pigeonholed by the aesthetics of their previous work, but really, a place that did work for banks and boring ass corporate clients? http://www.kitebrandstudio.com/work.html If they were looking for something energetic, diverse, and dynamic, then a boutique design studio could have done something much more interesting instead of a branding firm. But branding firms are really good at presenting estimates in response to briefs that make themselves look super professional and capable of handling everything, even though they usually just sell a lot of talk and deliver sub-par design.
Posted by 311_TruthMovement on December 2, 2009 at 12:25 PM
Will in Seattle 60
@58 ... uh, are you on drugs?

at best it's Meh.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on December 2, 2009 at 12:36 PM
Fnarf 61
@59, you're confusing "Capitol Hill" the neighborhood with the Capitol Hill Chamber of Commerce. Banks and corporate clients? That's exactly fitting for the C of C. And, of course, banks and corporate clients are the only people who give a shit about "branding strategies" in the first place. This "Capitol Hill" and your Capitol Hill, and mine, are unrelated things.
Posted by Fnarf http://www.facebook.com/fnarf on December 2, 2009 at 12:44 PM
62
It's obvious that they spent more time and effort on the press release trying to justify the logo than on the actual design of the logo itself.

A well designed logo or identity should need no explanation.
Posted by Any Capitol Hill Designer Can Do Better on December 2, 2009 at 1:06 PM
Reverse Polarity 63
How about:

6. Clusterfuck
Posted by Reverse Polarity on December 2, 2009 at 1:16 PM
64
Jittery. Nervous. That's how it makes me feel.
Posted by cineaste on December 2, 2009 at 1:18 PM
65
Wow. I am a designer at studio in Seattle. All of us the designers here agreed (and we ALL live on Capitol Hill!) this logo result is similar to our first ever type exploration freshman year of design school. Or, if any of you have a hard time relating to a project such as that, it's kinda like the first time you got drunk at college (experimental!) and projectile vomited all over the place.
Posted by I think it's time to move to Ballard. on December 2, 2009 at 1:24 PM
Annag 66
What the hell are we going to need a logo for anyways?
Also, there's a really good documentary called 'Helvetica' that discusses the origin of the font and how almost every single corporation or uncreative designer uses it because it means nothing and doesn't convey any message so they use it to try and not portray any meaning because they don't have the ability to come up with anything unique.
Posted by Annag on December 2, 2009 at 1:33 PM
67
saw this a month ago - somewhere - as prototype and was horrified

the C. Hill Chamber has all the Sound Transit money to "mitigate" ... hence this crap

it has the feel a very heavy tweaking - bad jitters - and ugly green of no NW forest - shit all around

why the Bellevue firm - who is sucking who, always the answer

Posted by Choir Boy No More on December 2, 2009 at 1:37 PM
68
Setting aside frustration that they wouldn't use a designer from the Hill:

On a formal typography level this is not a good logo – the letterspacing is bad. It's like when that dude left a bone in his dish on Top Chef – he was just automatically removed from consideration.

I also think the typeface looks cheap and vaguely suburban (@66: that's not Helvetica). But I actually think the cluster of letters is moving in a good direction – it just needs to be finessed, a lot. If it was made into a more solidified shape it could be a container, to be filled with photos, patterns, etc.

As it is, @20 with the win.
Posted by Strath http://pacific-standard.blogspot.com on December 2, 2009 at 1:38 PM
69
I believe the typeface is Gotham, which in all caps is beautiful – the type designers Hoefler & Frere-Jones walked around Manhattan and took photos of classic old signs for a few years, and then constructed the caps based on their research. I love Gotham but I don't think it would be right for Capitol Hill, really, and especially in lowercase, which has always looked cheapo to me compared to similar lowercase sans-serifs. Alright... that's enough obsessing.
Posted by Strath http://pacific-standard.blogspot.com on December 2, 2009 at 1:52 PM
70
Did they actually PAY for this???
Posted by SuperSteve on December 2, 2009 at 1:54 PM
71
Makes me feel like someone put a roofie in my drink.
Posted by datajunkie on December 2, 2009 at 1:59 PM
72
The font weight is too thin to be read at distance--which is how all those folks will be reading it in signs. The ascenders and descenders on the font itself tend to get lost in the green, and the "ill" in "hill" turns into a fuzzy mess from a distance. The white from the negative space is going to make reading the letters even harder. The green shape doesn't read as ANYTHING...just a splotchy mess. The white negative space that dips down to touch that last L in "hill" doesn't even align with the L, so it doesn't look clever, it looks like an accident, and that little jigjog is driving me crazy.

I KNOW there's an art college at the end of Broadway, and lots of graphic designers live in the area. Surely, this wasn't the best option? Sometimes it's better to say, "This isn't what we want," and pay a killfee and walk away.
Posted by PixelFish on December 2, 2009 at 2:01 PM
73
If capitol hill is a new brand, what were we calling it before?
Posted by NapoleonXIV on December 2, 2009 at 2:13 PM
74
@73: the neighborhood around the Comet.

If only we'd had a logo....
Posted by Strath http://pacific-standard.blogspot.com on December 2, 2009 at 2:18 PM
Carollani 75
It's a good logo that does what it set out to do.

Why are there so many haters? Do you ever ask yourself why your first reaction is a negative one?
Posted by Carollani http://twitter.com/carollani on December 2, 2009 at 2:23 PM
76
Because it looks like a giant pile of caterpillar puke?
Posted by NapoleonXIV on December 2, 2009 at 2:30 PM
TVDinner 77
Very eighties.
Posted by TVDinner http:// on December 2, 2009 at 2:34 PM
78
Hi, Carollani: I put a lot of my technical and aesthetic complaints in my comment. I should also add that the logo itself is very generic. If you changed the words "capitol hill" to something else, would you still get the feeling that this logo conveyed the energy of a unique, whimsical, and diverse neighbourhood? Not really. It's a single colour logo, which gives it a rather flat feel and doesn't evoke diversity at all. This is messy--not energetic. The typography is sloppy. Try squinting at the logo--the shapes don't really convey The Hill. Letterforms beging to get lost. Technically, this logo is a very low-grade effort. Message-wise, it's generic.
Posted by PixelFish on December 2, 2009 at 2:35 PM
79
It looks like the logo for a lame condo building with those faux balconies, i.e. the ones that are just sliding doors opening to the void with a shitty railing keeping you from falling out. These are the same ones with underground parking lots that piss off the Stranger writers.

They should put "q." before the name because it looks techie or some shit, it introduces no phonetic change and putting "i." before words is so 2001.
Posted by Reg on December 2, 2009 at 2:43 PM
80
This is so fucking awesome!!!! Finally I will be proud to tell people I live on Capitol Hill! They will be all like "Oh you mean the place with that kick ass logo?!" and then I'll be all like "Hell yes!"
Posted by SeattleSeven on December 2, 2009 at 2:50 PM
81
I actually like this logo, although it does look like something nickelodeon put out to appeal to teenagers in 1996.

also, I live in bellevue. what is wrong with us??
Posted by Stubble on December 2, 2009 at 3:17 PM
82
I hate it, and the person who designed it is a FUCKTARD!! I bet the office this was designed in features glass bricks, dunno why I think this, it's just a hunch. I think I would have preferred Times New Roman 12pt font on an itty bitty sign held up by toothpicks. hrmph.
Posted by Hummingbird on December 2, 2009 at 3:35 PM
Fnarf 83
@72, you're never going to be reading it on signs. The C of C is going to make up some weak-ass pole banners, like they've got in lots of other neighborhoods, and hang them from light poles. They are going to look stupid, and forced, and like what they are: a failed attempt to apply marketing-school bullshit to something real, i.e., a neighborhood. See @28 -- remember the West Edge? I think those banners are still up. No one has ever looked at them.

There will also be some web page banners, advertising the same sort of worthless crap the C of C has been doing under their own logo. There will probably be pamphlets made. Maybe you'll see them if you spend the rest of your life scanning those tourist-attraction racks in hotels and on ferries.

There is absolutely nothing, nothing, nothing about Capitol Hill or any other neighborhood anywhere in the world that branding can speak to. Sometimes this kind of marketroid-speak can help sell real estate, by creating new neighborhood names to avoid associations with old ones (SoDo, anyone?) but Capitol Hill already has an identity -- zero percent of which is the result of marketers, designers, brand positioners, or anyone else of their ilk.

This is what Chambers of Commerce do: piss away money on brain-dead marketing schemes. And your local businesses get to pay out the ass for the privilege.
Posted by Fnarf http://www.facebook.com/fnarf on December 2, 2009 at 3:40 PM
84
did someone write capitol hill in a pool of vomit?

would have looked dated in 1995!!!!!!!!!!

the chcc is as out of touch with the community as it
is with good design.

far beyond lame!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by mysterycat on December 2, 2009 at 4:00 PM
balderdash 85
Bored.
Posted by balderdash http://introverse.blogspot.com on December 2, 2009 at 4:05 PM
86
This is, to coin a phrase, super bad.
Posted by halfmad on December 2, 2009 at 4:16 PM
87
@83: That was the sort of signage I was thinking of actually--the pole banners. And I still maintain that it doesn't read well for people driving by in cars, cabs, or buses.

Still maintain it's too generic to provide "branding" and doesn't reflect Cap Hill at all.

Posted by PixelFish on December 2, 2009 at 4:30 PM
88
I don't like the font, the color, or the design.
Posted by mitten on December 2, 2009 at 4:58 PM
Gus 89
I dunno, it looks kind of Belltown to me. The diversity of identically colored, pretentious, lowercase letters, the ugly color...
Posted by Gus on December 2, 2009 at 5:09 PM
90
it should just be spelled out in lines of coke. or just a picture of coke. people will know where theyre talking about.
Posted by hate city on December 2, 2009 at 5:28 PM
Anc 91
Needs more cowbell.

And rainbows.

Yes, cowbell and rainbows and that would be a kickass sign.
Posted by Anc on December 2, 2009 at 6:12 PM
WALKMAN 92
i like nothing about it
Posted by WALKMAN http://cbabc.com/hooker on December 2, 2009 at 6:34 PM
WALKMAN 93
i like nothing about it
Posted by WALKMAN http://cbabc.com/hooker on December 2, 2009 at 6:34 PM
dollface 94
i feel like i'm in a gameboy while someone good is playing alleyway. on a really high level.
Posted by dollface http://www.protovietic.wordpress.com on December 2, 2009 at 6:53 PM
95
Having seen design by a municipal committee before ("Can't you put some snow on that mountain? It doesn't look exactly like Rainier, it's missing a bump, it should be blue, right? Can we have a couple more trees?" ad nauseum), I would hate to be the design firm who got this assignment, no matter where they live.

Definitely a case of be-careful-what-you-wish-for. I would love to have been a fly on the wall and have seen the directions as they were presented, so I could compare them to the end product.

Yeah, it's not a great logo. But as others have pointed out, does Capitol Hill really need one? If so, Squire Park/Cherry Hill is next in line. Ooh baby, I can hardly wait!
Posted by glad I'm not a designer on December 2, 2009 at 7:02 PM
96
@59: I think they've pigeon-holed themselves. Most of the work on their site is very same-y.
Posted by FeralTurnip on December 2, 2009 at 7:43 PM
97
#81... HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Posted by okayokay on December 2, 2009 at 8:10 PM
98
this looks like something a first semester design student would do, in 1977.
Posted by johnny ranger on December 2, 2009 at 8:51 PM
99
I don't quite get all these negative comments.
I feel like the logo is a good representation of the energy, the edgy, and the irreverent qualities that are so much part of Capitol Hill.
Posted by kingofthehill on December 2, 2009 at 9:33 PM
100
This logo sucks. It's certainly the work of a lazy firm with lazy ideas.
Posted by not an uptight design snob on December 2, 2009 at 9:58 PM
101
this is terrible, i think there should be a "please redesign option" in the poll.
SERIOUSLY.

REDO! REDO!

Or the Chamber of Commerce should just get their money back and consult some actual talent in SEATTLE. Like, Dumb Eyes (www.dumbeyes.com), who office is coincidentally in Capitol hill...

OY VEY!
Posted by heureux17 on December 2, 2009 at 10:50 PM
102
#80 WINS

#54, pro-bono is probably right, but no excuse.
Posted by nod in ham on December 2, 2009 at 11:11 PM
103
Is'nt all that ink (paint etc.) kind of expensive? Why can't they just use a tasteful script and a happy face. You know, chic but not pretentious.
Posted by dani girl on December 2, 2009 at 11:54 PM
104
Strong case for Ad Agency != Design Firm. Most ad agencies buy stock photography and put text on top of it and design logos like this.

I hate to be a hater, but there's not much to like.
Posted by marcelebrate on December 3, 2009 at 12:48 AM
105
Oh, I forgot:

Is that a captcha?
Posted by marcelebrate on December 3, 2009 at 12:50 AM
106
The press release is way more exciting than the logo. The simplicity of the concept meant that it needed to be executed really, really, really well. Unfortunately... FAIL.

Posted by Manthony on December 3, 2009 at 2:09 AM
107
Yuck.
Posted by mammal on December 3, 2009 at 6:33 AM
108
nope. have a capitol hill firm design it. wtf? Bellevue?
Posted by abdominal pain on December 3, 2009 at 7:03 AM
109
cluttered.

I live the Hill. This logo does NOT speak to me.
Posted by Dod on December 3, 2009 at 7:07 AM
Sir Vic 110
My impression is that it is the graphic from a 1978 ABC sitcom, or possibly from a roller rink's marketing flyer from about the same time frame. I just can't shake the visual of the phrase "Capitol Hill" popping up once on the screen, then as the cheesy music & announcer start up, the phrase is repeatedly layered to the point it ends up looking like it does now.

It evokes thoughts of platform shoes, perms & disco.

Perfect!
Posted by Sir Vic on December 3, 2009 at 9:40 AM
translinguistic other 111
Whoa, 110 comments and I get to be the first one to say...heh heh...more like CRAPITOL Hill!
Posted by translinguistic other on December 3, 2009 at 10:07 AM
112
lolz
Posted by awful on December 3, 2009 at 11:26 AM
113
Eh, I have a two year old so I see stuff like this a lot. Not bad as far as that style goes.

And it is so much easier to be a critic than a designer. Fun!
Posted by PA Native on December 3, 2009 at 11:53 AM
114
crayon drawing
Posted by sars on December 3, 2009 at 12:03 PM
115
Think of it as an reflected image of Broadway. It reminds me of all the building they are doing on Broadway right now and what the hill will look like in the future.

It also looks like a logo for the one of the "fake" Starbucks that are sneaking into our hip urban neighborhoods.
Posted by superstarlibrarian on December 3, 2009 at 12:11 PM
tammy 116
thank you superstarlibrarian for your enlightening comment, i agree. i hate the fake starbucks almost as much as i hate this logo, which is saying a lot.

i just really hope chcc's staff are reading these comments...
Posted by tammy on December 3, 2009 at 12:23 PM
117
"And it is so much easier to be a critic than a designer. Fun! "

if by "designer" you mean "someone with the competency to type two words, copy them, change the color and paste them about 50 times," it's not much easier!
Posted by photoshop n00b on December 3, 2009 at 12:26 PM
118
Nobody gives a crap about capitol hill or the douchey poseurs that flock there. Nobody but self-absorbed graphic designers that moved to seattle from some suburban shit-box give a crap about this "typographic" garbage anyway.
Posted by capitol hill blows and so does the Stranger on December 3, 2009 at 12:46 PM
JF 119
Makes me proud to have grown up in Bellevue. Suck it. Suck it long and suck it hard.
Posted by JF on December 3, 2009 at 1:31 PM
120
So it took them maybe 30 minutes to build the logo and, what... 2 weeks to come up with the accompanying bullshit explanation?
Posted by tkm on December 3, 2009 at 2:31 PM
Rev.Smith 121
@3 FTW.
voted other. = as in, shaky cam for cap hill? Vision problem? Too many long island iced teas at charlies? The view of the logo sign once the rail tunnelling and jackhammers start??
Not in love with it. It's a gawddamn scribble. And why is the last "L" not contained like the rest? (Is it trying to move away ...from the Brix?) And the Street-Sign Green™. How...civic. Plus, where's the hill? The scribble could have at least been in a hill-shaped??
Please do over.
Oh, and Mary?
"...said Mary Weisnewski, principal of Kite. “A brand must meaningfully connect to all of its stakeholders ...The final solution needed to reveal the thread that pulls them all together"

The "Final Solution" is perhaps not the best choice of words to apply, in pitching say, symbolic marketing, to a neighborhood known for pink triangles, two decent bagel/lox joints and the Temple De Hirsch Sinai*. Might wanna do yer homework there, kiddo.

@12/@19 /@29 honorable mention.

@120: did you just describe the Seattle Center Makeover or the Viaduct Replacmeent Tunnel - can't tell which.

@119: ah, cute, look how the little one isn't getting any and isn't even trying to be subtle about it...
(not sure you should mention the word 'long' - in your case it just brings up certain shortcomings...)

*it's renton hill, but no one calls it that anymore. so It's capitol hill dammit.That's what the mike's on madison crowd used to call it.
Posted by Rev.Smith on December 4, 2009 at 4:29 AM
122
I mentor 1st year design students at a vocational college. I can safely say that any one of them would have produced a better logo than this. Glad to see money's been well spent!
Posted by mikem on December 4, 2009 at 8:28 AM
123
@91 - I totally agree. In fact, I think it should say "Capitol Hill: More Cowbell." And the cowbell could have a rainbow flag hanging off it and it would be Purrfect. But as it is, I think I hate it even more than I hate Fake Starbucks (which in turn I hate even more than I hate Starbucks), all of which is to say that I really fucking hate it.
Posted by jen on December 4, 2009 at 7:24 PM
Violet_DaGrinder 124
@122

Yeah, I have a decade-old certificate in multimedia design from a random community college, and I could make this logo in approximately 10 minutes, pre-coffee.

I could make a BETTER logo than that in the following 10 minutes.

In summary: fuck Bellevue.
Posted by Violet_DaGrinder http://www.imeem.com/jukeboxmusic51/music/y1malqpG/prince-the-new-power-generation-featuring-eric-leeds-on-f/ on December 4, 2009 at 7:51 PM
Violet_DaGrinder 125
I'm including in that 10-minute estimate the time it would take me to figure out the new version of Photoshop, or whatever Adobe is calling it these days.
Posted by Violet_DaGrinder http://www.imeem.com/jukeboxmusic51/music/y1malqpG/prince-the-new-power-generation-featuring-eric-leeds-on-f/ on December 4, 2009 at 7:55 PM
126
Lame!
Posted by dakati on December 5, 2009 at 2:45 AM
127
Great logo. You guys wouldn't like a Picasso if you'd see one, so entrenched you are in your snobby hypercriticism. Get a life.
Posted by Ernie82 on June 14, 2010 at 9:57 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy