"Greenhouse gases." Wow. To me a greenhouse is a nice place where you go and look at nice flowers. They have climeate control inside so it keeps it the right temprature. I don't know what gasses they have inside greenhouses, but they must be nice, because a greenhouse is a nice place.

So this term sucks and fails to inform people what's going on.

I also recently learned that those graphics of sun rays bouncing off the earth and "hitting" a wall of shield up in the atmosphere, which contains the sun rays, is also false. Seems like what really happens in the co2 fills the atmosphere and it absorbs heat more like a blanket than a wall, so what's going on is we are changing our atmosphere into a heat blanket and heating up the earth causing climate change.

Maybe people would get what's going on more if we didn't call it greenhouse gases. If we called the nazi death chambers showers because they had showers in them it also would not convery the bad thing that happened. Why would we pick words that distort and fail to explain?

"os see it makes it LIKE a greenhouse because a green hosue warms up so but in this case that's bad unlike a greenhouse which is a case in which warmth is good" is a pretty convoluted thing to have to make people "get." Those comparisons and double reverse ironies never work in communicating to the public, though graduate degreed people just love that stuff.

Can we call it "overloading the atmosphere with carbon monoxide and dioxide" at least that sounds like something bad and harmful ?