Is the subject of a profile in the NYT... travel section? The article doesn't say much about Seattle theater except that it exists, it includes/ed people like Bart Sher, Kurt Beattie, et al.
Also: "Offbeat delights abound."
In the "offbeat" category:
Teatro ZinZanni, for instance, offers a five-course meal and a European-style cirque act, sometimes with aerial performing in the relatively small space. Another entertaining staple is “The Twilight Zone: Live!,” a long-running stage re-enactment of episodes from the Rod Serling series, at Theater Schmeater.
Is it an insult to have a city's theater scene profiled in a travel section, by a writer who doesn't show much curiosity about it? Or is it a compliment? Does it signal that the scene is of interest to the generalist, not just the specialist?
More fundamentally: Does it even fucking matter?
UPDATE!
I'm taking the "fucking" out of the last sentence because it made the question sound more petulant than I feel. And now commenters (and several email correspondents) are all: "You're a sneering dumb irresponsible jerk who's all threatened by the NYT travel writer." And I don't feel threatened or sneering or jerky about it.
I'm guessing the "fucking" caused the confusion. (As the fucking sometimes does.)
1
2
3
4
9
10
13
Comments (13) RSS