Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Thursday, November 19, 2009

Grant Cogswell on Watching Mike McGinn Break the Seattle Machine

Posted by on Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 6:28 AM

mcginngreen.jpg

It begins:

When you've fought every day for 10 years to turn a map you and a friend drew at a kitchen table into a $2 billion transit agency, and volunteered and done strategy for two winning underdog city council campaigns, and then run for city council yourself and nearly made it—to say nothing of half a dozen city and county ballot initiatives you've run, the first of which was called the region's biggest political upheaval of the decade on the cover of the Sunday New York Times—and in the end you lost most of your battles against WaMu or Paul Allen or the state or the Seahawks or the Mariners and had the gain sucked out of those battles you won, you know a couple things, or more precisely one thing: You know that the fix is usually in.

And you get pretty good at calling races...

Skipping ahead a few paragraphs:

It was painful to watch McGinn campaigning, because his agenda was exactly the one I fronted when I ran for city council in 2001 (plus consultants and savvy calculation). I hung back at the McGinn event [I helped organize], moved chairs, dimmed the lights when asked, ate sitting down, drank heavily. The candidate and I found ourselves going for the red beans and rice at the same time—we had never met before—and he recognized me, grinned broadly, and shook my hand. He said, "You've been through all this" or "You kind of laid the template for this" or "You helped us get here"—I would like to remember what exactly, but I could barely concentrate on what he was saying. I kept thinking about energy and idealism and hope and young hearts being thrown against this immovable thing. Wasted time. I could barely speak. He was nice. He was going to lose.

But there were things going on that I did not see.

The essay also touches on Seattle in the 1990s, the death of the monorail, Seattle's faux-environmentalism, how power is structured in this city, Richard Conlin's "deck-chair-rearranging legislation," grassroots democracy, Facebook, the unlikely new insiders at City Hall, and more. The whole thing is HERE.

 

Comments (11) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
JF 1
all right, who's going to make the first joke about going up against the Seahawks/Mariners and not being able to win?
Posted by JF on November 19, 2009 at 7:37 AM
2
While I understand his frustration with people who don't walk the green talk, Grant ought to move to the Midwest for awhile...here in Chicago, environmentalism is far, far behind Seattle. Seattle's only faux-environmental from a very high standard -- which isn't to say the city can't and shouldn't do more...but when you live somewhere that doesn't offer consistent recycling programs to residents and where garbage sort of litters the streets whenever it's windy, you start appreciating what the Northwest has accomplished a heckuva lot more.
Posted by seattleeco on November 19, 2009 at 7:38 AM
Will in Seattle 3
Would the first Seattle-hater to leave the town please turn off the headlights in their SUV?

Thanks.

Oh, and stop talking on your cell phone while they key's in the ignition - it's illegal in this state.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on November 19, 2009 at 8:44 AM
Baconcat 4
@3: Will, you've obviously never attempted to cross Pike at Boren. It feels like you can't make that left toward I-5 without yammering away on your phone.

Someone's going to get hit there.
Posted by Baconcat on November 19, 2009 at 8:51 AM
The Striking Viking 5
I find myself once again coming to the defense of a family friend, Richard Conlin...a lot of people make a big deal out of his "killing the monorail" etc., but as a civil engineer i can guarantee that a monorail system is very impractical to implement in a city such as seattle, as they rely on a tire-drive system which are poor at climbing much of any incline especially when the track gets wet. He simply listened to the engineers and understood that particular plan would not be a good one for seattle instead of doing a crowd-pleasing approval.

I know this is not the focus of the article, and i know seattle could do a lot more for environmentalism, but you can blame voters for shooting down just as many environmentally inspired measures as the seattle city council.
Posted by The Striking Viking on November 19, 2009 at 9:43 AM
Oh Hi. 6
The second to last paragraph in the article says it all. Nice to hear that others have the same dream.
Posted by Oh Hi. on November 19, 2009 at 9:46 AM
Will in Seattle 7
@4 - don't care. still illegal.

don't like it ... then move.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on November 19, 2009 at 10:23 AM
8

Is Grant Cogswell writing about himself or about Mike McGinn? The author's Clintonian ego gets in the way of his analysis.
Posted by edmundburke on November 19, 2009 at 11:20 AM
9
The Striking Viking @5: I find myself once again coming to the defense of a family friend, Richard Conlin...a lot of people make a big deal out of his "killing the monorail" etc.,

Tell you what, Striking Viking, Richard Conlin has a great opportunity now to prove that he's not just a mass transit poser. McGinn wants to bring westside light rail to a vote within his term. Same corridor as the Green Line, but superior technology as you and Conlin would have it. Let's see if he does everything he can to make this happen and make it the best line it can be.

I'm not holding my breath. Richard Conlin has always struck me as someone who wouldn't go out on a limb even if the limb was insured by Lloyd's of London. Let's face it, words like "leadership" and "courage" and "vision" don't exactly spring to mind when you think of Richard Conlin. And those are qualities that are absolutely necessary for any politician who's going to champion the idea of getting taxpayers to pay for an ambitious, new mass transit line.

Just look at Conlin (and the whole council's) "visionary" work on the SLU streetcar. It took a particular combination of cowardice and cluelessness to take a mode--streetcars--that already represents a low-impact, on-the-cheap, pareve compromise and find a way to do something half-ass even by streetcar standards.
Posted by cressona on November 19, 2009 at 12:48 PM
10
"but as a civil engineer i can guarantee that a monorail system is very impractical to implement in a city such as seattle, as they rely on a tire-drive system which are poor at climbing much of any incline"

Right steel on steel is so much better at climbing hills - idiot
Posted by check it on November 20, 2009 at 8:30 AM
The Striking Viking 11
@9, I do plan on talking to Richard about the light rail advocacy, and i promise he is responsive to voter feedback (most of the bicycle infrastructure - sharrows, bike lanes etc - that have gone up in the last few years were largely his doing after getting a lot of feed back from constituents). Sure it would be great if he, and the rest of SCC, did everything we wanted them to do without asking, but sometimes they need some suggestion.

@10, take some transportation technology classes, then we'll talk. It's not a simple matter of friction, but that wouldn't matter to you, would it?
Posted by The Striking Viking on November 20, 2009 at 11:18 AM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy