Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Wednesday, November 18, 2009

You Look Good Enough to Eat

Posted by on Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 12:51 PM

Over at h+ magazine's blog, it's "Eight Ways In-Vitro Meat will Change Our Lives," about how meat grown in a lab instead of on the hoof will liberate us all. Among the eight ways: no more animal-to-human plagues, former ranch land given over to waving fields of hemp, fewer greenhouse gasses due to the end of all those animal emissions, and...

6: Exotic & Kinky Cuisine.

In-Vitro Meat will be fashioned from any creature, not just domestics that were affordable to farm. Yes, ANY ANIMAL, even rare beasts like snow leopard, or Komodo Dragon. We will want to taste them all. Some researchers believe we will also be able to create IVM using the DNA of extinct beasts — obviously, "DinoBurgers" will be served at every six-year-old boy's birthday party.

Humans are animals, so every hipster will try Cannibalism. Perhaps we'll just eat people we don't like, as author Iain M. Banks predicted in his short story, "The State of the Art" with diners feasting on "Stewed Idi Amin." But I imagine passionate lovers literally eating each other, growing sausages from their co-mingled tissues overnight in tabletop appliances similar to bread-making machines. And of course, masturbatory gourmands will simply gobble their own meat.

Now it is time for lunch.

 

Comments (39) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
Super Jesse 1
I've been saying this shit for years, much to the horror of those around me. True americans prefer bald eagle burgers.
Posted by Super Jesse on November 18, 2009 at 12:57 PM
Fnarf 2
Um, no. The species is just one of hundreds of factors that go into making meat delicious. How, for just one example, is muscle tissue going to be exercised so that it's not mush?
Posted by Fnarf http://www.facebook.com/fnarf on November 18, 2009 at 1:01 PM
3
kinda like veal, Fnarf?
Posted by UNPAID COMMENTER on November 18, 2009 at 1:08 PM
4
But seriously, this guy had me until he completely jumped the rails and started proposing cannabilism. I began to suspect he was an undercover vegan operative right around the time he started suggesting lovers would eat sausage made from they're combined meat. yuck.
Posted by UNPAID COMMENTER on November 18, 2009 at 1:10 PM
5
And, of course, there will be "designer meat" for gourmands unsatisfied with what naturally evolved DNA can put on the plate.

Anyone for fishken? or beeork? The gene pool is the limit...
Posted by Edward on November 18, 2009 at 1:13 PM
6
So what about the energy inputs and greenhouse gases involved with growing meat in a lab? Does electricity grow on trees?
Posted by keshmeshi on November 18, 2009 at 1:14 PM
7
I would love to consume Björk, Edward.
Posted by paulus on November 18, 2009 at 1:16 PM
8
* their
Posted by UNPAID COMMENTER on November 18, 2009 at 1:17 PM
Matt from Denver 9
The best steak is tenderloin, and tenderloin is the least exercised muscle. Coincidence? Nope. It's also one of the reasons animals are slaughtered at very young ages - their more tender overall than older animals.
Posted by Matt from Denver on November 18, 2009 at 1:22 PM
10
I just want them to make human milk widely available as a beverage. It's delicious and nutritious.
Posted by dwight moody on November 18, 2009 at 1:24 PM
cedarthvader 11
I just threw up in my mouth.
Posted by cedarthvader http://open.salon.com/blog/cedar_burnett on November 18, 2009 at 1:28 PM
TVDinner 12
My bowels are screaming in terror.
Posted by TVDinner http:// on November 18, 2009 at 1:32 PM
Greg 13
Excuse me, I have to go and vomit.
Posted by Greg on November 18, 2009 at 1:34 PM
14
Wow, Fnarf. When was the last time you went hunting and ate an animal that was "exercised"? You do realize that cages are a prerequisite for growing animal meat today (even local and organic), right?

#6: The greenhouse gases would be completely negligible if they decreased animal consumption. All the power plants in the world PLUS all the cars in the world PLUS all the airplanes in the world don't contribute as much to global warming as growing livestock for meat.

http://bit.ly/livestockwarming
Posted by how do i donate on November 18, 2009 at 1:41 PM
15
revolting
Posted by myr on November 18, 2009 at 1:42 PM
Urgutha Forka 16
Animals will still fart regardless of whether we eat them or not.

In fact, if nobody's eating them, there will be more of them emitting greenhouse-gas inducing farts.
Posted by Urgutha Forka on November 18, 2009 at 1:43 PM
Julie in Eugene 17
I would think one of the biggest markets for this would be chicken... think of all the chicken nugget-type products (in the grocery store and in fast food places) where the meat is pressed into a particular shape. It resembles meat almost not at all, and a switch to lab-grown meat would probably not even be noticed.

I doubt Filet Mignon at Smith & Wollensky is ever going to be replaced with lab meat, but think of all the mass-produced shit out there where price is more important than taste and texture.
Posted by Julie in Eugene on November 18, 2009 at 1:45 PM
danindowntown 18
@ 14 "You do realize that cages are a prerequisite for growing animal meat today (even local and organic), right?" No I don't realize that to be the case but I do recognize that as a generalization and as one of the weak-tea arguments that vegans (from a culture rich enough to support a vegan lifestyle) routinely make when trying to convince others that their pedantry is just.

I routinely buy free-range (I have even been to their farm and seen the animals grazing freely) beef, pork and chicken from a local producer in the Skagit Valley and the meat it tender. If you guy local and organic you can still get tender cuts of meat from animals not "grown" in cages. Some of the cuts will be tough, which is what nature intends, and those cuts can be braised to make tender.

FAIL
Posted by danindowntown on November 18, 2009 at 1:49 PM
Julie in Eugene 19
Also, this is kind of a neat technology to think about, in terms of what would change if it ever becomes viable for mass production. Especially for beef. Whose livelihoods would be affected (ranchers, slaughterhouses, corn farmers)? What would we do with all that land that's used to grow feed corn and raise cows now? Even beyond how the environment would be impacted, this is interesting stuff.
Posted by Julie in Eugene on November 18, 2009 at 1:55 PM
20
I bet a cow makes meat more efficiently than a laboratory. Meat needs a circulatory system to grow, nutrients that would have to come from somewhere (plants perhaps?) that would have to be processed and purified, the meat would need to be sterile, not an easy task...etc etc
Posted by SlimPickens on November 18, 2009 at 2:11 PM
Baconcat 21
Gosh, I sure don't regret giving up meat at this rate.
Posted by Baconcat on November 18, 2009 at 2:14 PM
Will in Seattle 22
If they took all the hipsters who want to do this and let them loose on a cannibal island, the world would be a far better place.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on November 18, 2009 at 2:55 PM
Breklor 23
@20: Only part of the cow - less than half by weight, I suspect, but don't quote me - is edible meat. A big chunk of the cow's energy input goes toward growing the non-meat parts - bones, skin, the yuckier internal organs, etc. And another big chunk goes toward moving the cow around, breathing, etc. Once we've overcome the initial engineering challenges so that vat-growing meat becomes routine, I expect it will require less raw materials per pound of meat. Nutrient-wise, I bet a glucose solution with trace minerals will do the job.

As for sterility, have you read Fast Food Nation? Vat meat has no bowels. 'Nuff said.
Posted by Breklor on November 18, 2009 at 2:57 PM
24
This is a little too Oryx and Crake for me. ChickiNobs, anyone?
Posted by seattleeco on November 18, 2009 at 2:58 PM
Gitai 25
Meh. Warren Ellis wrote about this shit in Transmetropolitan years and years ago.
Posted by Gitai on November 18, 2009 at 3:05 PM
COMTE 26
@25:

As did Frederik Pohl & CM Kornbluth more than 50 years ago...
Posted by COMTE http://www.chriscomte.com on November 18, 2009 at 3:20 PM
More, I Say! 27
@18, Ok, I'm not trying to defend trolls OR vegans, but a lot of cultures and religious groups adhere to strict vegan diets on a lot smaller budget than your average American meat-eater. Hindu folks, for an example. Lentils and rice are waaaaay cheaper than meat! http://rudenessgirl.blogspot.com/2009/11…
Posted by More, I Say! on November 18, 2009 at 3:37 PM
More, I Say! 28
Also, I move we just put Will on the cannibal island.
Posted by More, I Say! on November 18, 2009 at 3:38 PM
Fnarf 29
@9, since when is the best steak tenderloin? Tenderloin has no flavor. The best steak is rib eye or t-bone or Porterhouse. The best cut of beef is brisket, when properly prepared.

Diet: @23 suggests glucose with trace minerals. But diet is a HUGE part of what makes meat taste good. Part of the reason American factory beef tastes like shit is the steady diet of corn, as opposed to grass. Now you're going to grow it on glucose? You're going to make garbage, not food.
Posted by Fnarf http://www.facebook.com/fnarf on November 18, 2009 at 4:33 PM
COMTE 30
@29:

Thing is, most people who think McDonald's puts out a decent 'burger will never know the difference anyway.
Posted by COMTE http://www.chriscomte.com on November 18, 2009 at 4:42 PM
danindowntown 31
@ 27 I am glad you aren't defending trolls or vegans, both of which should be regarded as utterly indefensible.

I can't pretend to be an expert on Hindus or their diets but I don't believe that many are vegan, especially as we define vegans in this country. I do believe that many are vegetarians that consume large amounts of paneer and that even more avoid the consumption of beef.

A cogent argument can be made that Americans should eat less meat and should definitely be more concerned about how our food (both meat and non-meat) is raised/farmed but surely the pedantic, self-righteous, and insufferable vegan "lifestyle" is not the answer.

Posted by danindowntown on November 18, 2009 at 4:50 PM
leek 32
If they can ever make vat meat tasty and somewhat sustainable, I will be one happy consumer. I love the taste of meat, and I would eat a much healthier diet if I weren't always using carbs and dairy to replace the meat I avoid on moral grounds.

Posted by leek on November 18, 2009 at 4:53 PM
Lily Fluffbottom 33
If this really happens, I'm going to kill myself. I don't want to live in a world where my sun has dinoburgers for his birthday.
Posted by Lily Fluffbottom on November 18, 2009 at 5:06 PM
Irena 34
Julie in Eugene, I agree with you completely. Fnarf, you can still have your T-bone, but for the vast quantities of frozen and canned meat consumed in America, nobody would even know the difference.

I find it odd that so many are disgusted by this, but are seemingly okay with the present model of factory farms, which are thoroughly disgusting and morally reprehensible.
Posted by Irena on November 18, 2009 at 5:53 PM
Cochise. 35
On July 10th 2001 I received my first order of porterhouse manbeef ($59.97/lb).

http://web.archive.org/web/2001120421012…

Delicious. I will never forgive the feds for shutting them down.
Posted by Cochise. on November 18, 2009 at 6:18 PM
36
Now, genetic cannibalism is one thing, but there's no way in heck I'm going to eat something that could be considered my offspring... sausage from a concoction of mine and my lover's bodily fluids, indeed! Whatever happened to good old-fashioned oral sex?
Posted by iflurry http://newsflurry.livejournal.com/ on November 18, 2009 at 7:56 PM
Timmytee 37
@31: For a second I read your first paragraph as, "defending trolls or vegans, both of which should be regarded as utterly INDIGESTIBLE." LOL.
Posted by Timmytee on November 19, 2009 at 5:17 AM
Matt from Denver 38
@ Fnarf (if you see this at this point), since ALWAYS. You wrap it in bacon to give it flavor. If you've never done this you've never lived.
Posted by Matt from Denver on November 19, 2009 at 5:46 AM
39
So given this...whatever...We can assume that it is not a remote possibility that we could actually dine on stewed corrupt politicians with a side dish of trashy celebrities' salad made fresh every day sometime in the not-so-distant future. Heck, even if this were possible I wouldn't dare feed on such people lest I want to kill myself.
Posted by myohmy on November 24, 2009 at 7:37 AM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy