Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Monday, November 16, 2009

Celebrate the Gerrymandering

Posted by on Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 5:46 PM

37_dist.gif
It's time to redraw Washington's (already gerrymandered) legislative districts:

This political art-and-science, much beloved by government and election techno-geeks, is called “redistricting.” Every 10 years, the Constitution requires that our districts be redrawn so they’re of basically equal population — nine U.S. House districts and 49 legislative districts. [...]

The new website describes how a voter-approved, bipartisan commission will do the actual work. Short version: The four legislative caucuses each names a citizen commissioner and the four appoint a non-voting member as chair, such as a law prof or geographer/demographer. Neither side can “jam” the other, since the maps must be approved by at least three of the four voting members. The governor gets no vote and the Legislature must accept the plan up-or-down, with very little room for moving any of the lines.

Even though this commission has good guiding principles—e.g., "Districts should be convenient, contiguous (share a common land border or transportation route), and compact"—the damage is done. This deadlocked little committee can't fix a district that's already been gerrymandered to all hell. I live in the 37th Legislative District (click image to enlarge), which is anything but "convenient, contiguous ... and compact." Granted, there are worse examples of gerrymandering.

PS — There's a re-districting board game!

 

Comments (21) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
Renton Mike 1
I still remember talking about how gerrymandering was banned in social studies.
Posted by Renton Mike on November 16, 2009 at 5:51 PM
2
I remember how the poll tax was banned too, but here we are.
Posted by Laws shmaws on November 16, 2009 at 6:01 PM
3
In Utah, the 3 US House districts are drawn so that each one takes a piece of Salt Lake City and then includes a large rural area.
Posted by Utahn on November 16, 2009 at 6:06 PM
4
"how the poll tax was banned too, but here we are."

Alright, I'll take the victimologist's bait...what poll tax?
Posted by Donald Bradmans on November 16, 2009 at 6:24 PM
Fnarf 5
I think Texas has managed to jam virtually all of its Democrats into a single district that takes in 50% +1 of Austin and a narrow finger of land that runs all the way down to the border to take in 50% + 1 of the various Hispanic communities there.
Posted by Fnarf http://www.facebook.com/fnarf on November 16, 2009 at 6:26 PM
Cook 6
washington state is one of the best apportioned states, due to our bipartisan redistricting commission. even if some districts aren't perfect, by all regards they are the most fair in the country.

@4, i think the poll tax comment was in regards to placing a stamp on a mail-in ballot, which i agree is an unnecessary burden on the voter.

the old school website: http://www.redistricting.wa.gov/
Posted by Cook on November 16, 2009 at 6:44 PM
7
#4: Stamps, the reason Joe Mallahan started voting and turnout increased in rich zip codes (they have extra money) whereas turnout decreased in poorer zip codes (no disposable cash for a book of stamps).
Posted by Laws shmaws on November 16, 2009 at 6:47 PM
8
I don't know, Dominic. 37 is bounded by clear borders on three sides, and the north reaches a little further than what may be most convenient to accommodate population and/or policy interests.
Posted by roma on November 16, 2009 at 7:04 PM
baconpussy 9
8: Yeah, I was thinking "Where's the problem?" I thought there were gonna be all sorts of precinct tumors on it.
Posted by baconpussy on November 16, 2009 at 7:13 PM
Lose-Lose 10
You're complaining about the 37th?!? What's the problem? It's contiguous, shares several bus routes and is even homogeneously diverse. The 11th is a much better example of gerrymandered nightmares (tried taking a bus from renton to south park?) but yes, Washington isn't a gerrymanderist's dream. Best to cite Tom DeLay and the Texas gerrymandered massacre of 2002 or whenever it was.
Posted by Lose-Lose on November 16, 2009 at 7:13 PM
josh 11
It is definitely contiguous and somewhat more compact than its neighboring districts.
Posted by josh http://www.sciencevsromance.net on November 16, 2009 at 7:15 PM
Dominic Holden 12
@ 10 ) Agreed, the 11th and 47th are worse--not as bad as some in Texas--but I don't live in those.
Posted by Dominic Holden on November 16, 2009 at 7:20 PM
Curmudgeon 13
Nothing to see here. Move along.
Posted by Curmudgeon on November 16, 2009 at 7:27 PM
14
A 44 cent stamp? What's that, 10% of the price of a can of Nightrain?

You could also walk to any neighborhood vote drop box unless you're a totally lazy fuck.

Face it, the reason the poor don't vote is cuz they're too busy with the Playstations and shinning their rims to be bothered.
Posted by Donald Bradmans on November 16, 2009 at 7:34 PM
mcFly 15
its pretty rad that they have a self-aware boardgame on the state website. That's fun.
Posted by mcFly on November 16, 2009 at 8:14 PM
16
Huge topic here if someone really wants to get into it. Fact is the two parties negotiate, in private thank you very much, to divide up the state into the maximum number of one-party districts, roughly evenly divided between the two parties. And then the rest of the state gets divided into more closely-matched "swing" districts that ultimately determine the partisan outcomes in each house of the Legislature.

A more public-spirited goal would be to attempt to maximize the number of such swing districts, but as long as the process is totally controlled by the two parties, that will never happen.
Posted by Citizen R on November 16, 2009 at 8:21 PM
17
http://www.centrists.org/pages/2004/07/7…

How Iowa deals with gerrymandering.
Posted by guy on November 17, 2009 at 6:10 AM
Baconcat 18
Some choice Texas districts:

TX-20: File:TX20_109.gif">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:TX20_1… -- West Side, along I-35 and up to the NE side, all pretty poor neighborhoods. Has elected democrats with at least 2/3rds of the vote for the past few years.

TX-10: File:TX10_109.gif">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:TX10_1… -- Attempts to scoop up GOP-leaning farmers and oil fields, but has seen a consistent slide toward electing democrats in the past 8 years.

TX-22: File:TX22_109.gif">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:TX22_1… -- expected to be scraped of hispanics and black people again in 2010. Primarily Republicans.
Posted by Baconcat on November 17, 2009 at 8:26 AM
19
The gerrymandering of the last 20 years should be filed along with the vast array of 'little' problems at KC elections.
Posted by D. Tooley on November 17, 2009 at 9:57 AM
Posted by RonK, Seattle on November 17, 2009 at 5:26 PM
21
... Bad for Democrats.
Posted by RonK, Seattle on November 17, 2009 at 5:26 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy