Slog

News & Arts

Line Out

Music & Nightlife

Thursday, November 12, 2009

The Stranger Unsuggests: Sorry About Literary Death Match

Posted by Paul Constant on Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 12:35 PM

Dear everyone who took my advice and came out to Literary Death Match last night: I'm sorry.

There are two major problems with complaining about how readings are boring affairs, as host Todd Zuniga did last night at the opening of the second Seattle Literary Death Match at the Re-Bar. The first is that it's not true: I've been to five or six great readings in the last month alone, readings that were just as entertaining as the same amount of time spent at, say a good movie or a fun rock show. The second is that if you're going to talk about how boring and lame readings are, you have to be sure to put on an event that isn't lame and boring.

The full apology, which includes a response from LDM organizers, the truth about why monkeys on TV wear diapers, and information about how to get your $10 back from me if you attended this event, is after the jump.

The first problem with Literary Death Match last night was Zuniga. He opened with a joke about Ken Griffey Jr. that fell flat, he followed by bumbling over the rules for a few minutes, he fucked up the pronunciation of nearly every performer's name, and he never connected with the audience, choosing to arm himself with a slight air of condescension rather than actually preparing for his duties as a host.

The second problem with Literary Death Match is the format: Two readers read pieces, and judges determine a winner. This repeats in the second round. Then the two winners are forced to compete in a un-literary game to determine the winner of LDM. At the first Literary Death Match, the winners were blindfolded and had to stab a map of the United States as close to Nebraska as they could. Last night's Literary Death Match featured a bean bag toss.

There were some good things about LDM : Judge Maria Semple opened with a hilarious story about writing for Suddenly Susan. (In a last-minute deadline crunch, she wrote a scene in which a monkey erupted from a closet wearing a diaper. The audience learned that monkeys wear diapers on television to hide their enormous erections, and we also learned that Kathy Griffin brought her dog in to the set for the express purpose of agitating the monkey.)

Stacey Levine's story, which she adapted from an old children's book called I Like Birds, was all about paternal anxieties and soulless simulacrums. It was funny, fascinating, and clever. (Watching Levine refuse to take part in the lame, forced hilarity of the bean bag toss showdown was a high point for me, too.)

Eventual LDM winner (by default) Kelleen Conway Blanchard told a very funny story from the point of view of a clueless rocker dude having a fight with his girlfriend. It included more metaphors for female genitalia—a "tiny water slide," "nature's pockets," a "pink waterfall"—than a standard edition of The Vagina Monologues.

But at least one of the readers was painfully boring—he clearly didn't know what kind of room he was reading for—and there were so many humorless, awkward pauses that the Re-Bar at times took on a funereal vibe. I'm sure I didn't do enough as a judge to liven up the festivities, and I apologize for that.

People who attended the first LDM in Seattle say it ran smoothly and was entertaining. I asked Zuniga what he felt about the event, and he replied by e-mail:

Last night was a strange show. It was the 59th we've ever done, and for this one, something was just odd about it—the lighting, maybe? I know my hosting was, at best, C-. It's the second we've done here, and the first was too under-attended (only 40 showed up) to justify the second, but we went forward, and I'm glad we did (Stacey Levine's masterful reading is justification enough). For me, my goal with Opium and the Literary Death Match is to move literature into a pop-culture atmosphere, to restore books and reading to a place alongside Mad Men and the next Pixar film. And while some people will liked what they saw last night, and some people didn't, the $10 people shelled out directly impacts the publication of Opium Magazine—we're $2400 short of paying for Opium9 (with nine days of fundraising to go!), and this event put us a middle-sized step closer. And in the process, they got a few blips of entertainment, were in a room with other book-loving nerds.

We work so hard (everyone is busy, everyone's busting their humps, I realize) to make the Literary Death Match and Opium special. To take it beyond what people typically think of a literary magazine, or a literary event. Sometimes that's going to hit so hard it makes you want to run to a bookstore and buy the entire place up. Other times it's going to make you say: fuck, I could've gotten another drink and a half for that ten bucks! To me, that cost is worth the risk—from our standpoint, and from the people who come, hoping and expecting.

None of this would have been such a crime if it didn't cost ten dollars, but that exorbitant cover charge makes the whole thing Unsuggest-worthy. I apologize to everyone who came. I wish I could refund everybody's money, but I can't. So here's what I'm going to do: I will give $10 and a personal apology to the first three people who come to the Genius Awards party on Friday and tell me what they thought of the event. I'll give a personal apology to everyone else. And, yes, I can guarantee that the Genius Awards will be a good time.

Thanks for your kind attention,
Paul Bobby

Share via

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Newsvine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Email
 

Comments (13) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
elenchos 1
Calm down, Paul. Sometimes shows don't turn out so well. It happens. What, are you Woody Allen now?
Posted by elenchos on November 12, 2009 at 12:59 PM
2
That's too bad. But Maria Semple is flamin' awesome anyway.
Posted by gloomy gus on November 12, 2009 at 1:18 PM
3
it's ten freakin dollars. maybe the show was a bust, and maybe some people felt like paying ANYTHING for what they got was offensive. But the highlights you mentioned sound like at least $10 worth of entertainment right there.
Posted by genevieve on November 12, 2009 at 1:20 PM
stinkbug 4
Paul, what are the good readings you've recently been to? What makes for a good reading in your opinion? Has there recently been another installment of an author reviewing their reading (I guess I haven't been paying attention)?
Posted by stinkbug on November 12, 2009 at 1:30 PM
5
It does sorta stand to reason that the most popular piece in this kind of setting was written by the playwright. Kelleen's stuff is funny on its own, but it definitely benefits from being read aloud by her. Kinda the same way that poetry slams favor poets with performance chops over other writers whose work might look better on the page.
Posted by Books Aren't Movies on November 12, 2009 at 2:24 PM
6
Don't be a douche, Paul. BFD.
Posted by frankbooth5 on November 12, 2009 at 2:28 PM
7
Interesting. The LDMs are always packed and exciting in SF, NYC, London, LA, Denver, Chicago, pretty much everywhere BUT Seattle.
Posted by Andrew O. Dugas on November 13, 2009 at 9:03 AM
8
I don't think you should stop here. I think in fact you should pay 3 people ten dollars retroactively for every lackluster social engagement you have ever been to. You might in fact pay 3 people for everytime you disappointed your mother as a child. Pay 3 other people in the name of your high school english teacher who lost that exhuberance for life, that joy to move people forward, or for Kevin Spacey's recent utter lack in foresight of film choices.
It could be a brilliant little fund.
The Paul Constant $30 Fund for Remedying Disappointment.
You could really cheer the world up, make it spin a little more efficiently, improve the economy, get a hug.
Posted by J. Williams on November 13, 2009 at 9:37 AM
9
Exorbitant cover charge? People pay 12 dollars to see movies like Paul Blart Mall Cop. Enough said.
Posted by Nelson22 on November 13, 2009 at 10:21 AM
10
It just seems silly to complain -- in the headline, no less -- about an event that was the equivalent of two beers (including tip). Your article itself is fair -- and actually seems to praise the Literary Death Match more than anything else. I guess my thing is: If the host bothered you, somehow, why not send an email to him saying so? I just don't understand panning the event because 1 of the 4 readers was boring and you were irritated by someone's demeanor.

Last night's Literary Death Match here in Portland was fun. Zia McCabe was very drunk, and the readings were pretty dirty -- but it was a good time, overall. I guess that Opium Magazine should be praised for trying to do something a little unusual. I, myself, have been to dozens of readings where, if I didn't have to be there because one of the readers was a friend, I would have rather had my teeth extracted. Most people (non-writers) don't go to readings because they don't think of them as fun. Which is sad.
Posted by pauls2 on November 13, 2009 at 12:43 PM
11
It just seems silly to complain -- in the headline, no less -- about an event that was the equivalent of two beers (including tip). Your article itself is fair -- and actually seems to praise the Literary Death Match more than anything else. I guess my thing is: If the host bothered you, somehow, why not send an email to him saying so? I just don't understand panning the event because 1 of the 4 readers was boring and you were irritated by someone's demeanor.

Last night's Literary Death Match here in Portland was fun. Zia McCabe was very drunk, and the readings were pretty dirty -- but it was a good time, overall. I guess that Opium Magazine should be praised for trying to do something a little unusual. I, myself, have been to dozens of readings where, if I didn't have to be there because one of the readers was a friend, I would have rather had my teeth extracted. Most people (non-writers) don't go to readings because they don't think of them as fun. Which is sad.
Posted by pauls2 on November 13, 2009 at 12:43 PM
12
I think this is a clever way to promote LDM. Now it's controversial! I predict a 20% higher turnout next time based on this SLOG entry alone.
Posted by Shya http://www.shyascanlon.com on November 13, 2009 at 1:32 PM
13
Is SLAM not pop culture/competitive enough for them? Trying to muscle in on that action, or something else?
Posted by shy girl on November 13, 2009 at 4:51 PM

Add a comment

 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use