Slog

News & Arts

Line Out

Music & Nightlife

Monday, November 9, 2009

Needle Exchanges: Everywhere But Where We Want Them

Posted by Dominic Holden on Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 1:30 PM

The NYT has a good piece today about a the federal government's Trojan Horse bill to fund needle exchanges. The smart part? Congress is ready to lift a ban on federal funding for needle exchanges, which reduce disease transmission and put drug users in contact with drug-addiction counselors. This is a key mechanism in slowing the spread of HIV in America. The stupid part?

[T]he bill would also ban federally financed exchanges from being within 1,000 feet of a school, park, library, college, video arcade or any place children might gather — a provision that would apply to a majority of the country’s approximately 200 exchanges.

“This 1,000-foot rule is simply instituting the ban in a different form,” said Rebecca Haag, executive director of the AIDS Action Council, an advocacy group based in Washington. “Clearly the intent of this rule is to nullify the lifting of the ban.”

Under a separate bill, all exchanges in Washington within the 1,000-foot perimeter would be barred from receiving city money as well as federal money.

“Let’s protect these kids,” said Representative Jack Kingston, Republican of Georgia, who introduced the Washington bill. “They don’t need to be playing kickball in the playground and seeing people lined up for needle exchange.”

Hey, Kingston, in cities, everything is within 1,000 feet of "a school, park, library, college, video arcade or any place children might gather." In fact, everything is within zero feet of where something might happen. Obviously, kids don't need to be seeing drug users while they play kickball. But cities do need to contain rampant HIV and hepatitis rates among drug users. And that means needle exchanges in the city. The middle part of the city. Like near kickball fields and buses and trains. You don't want the drug users to drive somewhere to get the needles, right? I mean, junkies behind the wheel is probably a bad idea... If needle exchanges aren't accessible, people won't go to them. And if they don't go to them, then HIV rates in a city rise, and that's not very good for those kids playing kickball when they grow up.

Seattle used to have a needle exchange on 2nd Avenue and Pike Street, which was within 1,000 feet of children. Was it unsightly? Yes—junkies are generally crusty and gross. Could children walking to the Pike Place Market see it? Yes. But were they harmed by it? No—don't be ridiculous.

But we've already seen seen a preview of what would happen to our needle exchange, which is now in Belltown, if a 1,000-foot rule were applied in Seattle. It would leave downtown and find another location—like SODO. Even there, the Seattle Mariners tried to use the city's 800-foot rule to stop a strip club from opening near Safeco Field. They said kids go there. The strip club had a good lawyer and the Mariners lost, after nearly a year of legal proceedings. But needle exchanges don't have loads of cash and cadres of attorneys. And challenging them every time some puritanical business or homeowner wants to push needle exchange out of their neighborhood because a child might be there is a death sentence.

Share via

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Newsvine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Email
 

Comments (14) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
LaRiiiiM0RrrHAwtiiii696969 1
IS THIS SUPPOSED TO BE HELPFUL?

THANX FOR THE DRAWING SPACE LAST WEEK, AND FUNNY STUFF ON COVERS. GO TEAM!
Posted by LaRiiiiM0RrrHAwtiiii696969 http://balkin.blogspot.com/ on November 9, 2009 at 1:33 PM
2
College? Sounds like someone's extending the definition of "child" a little too broadly.
Posted by keshmeshi on November 9, 2009 at 1:36 PM
3
1000 feet probably doesn't sound too far to people from the 'burbs or the country.
Posted by dwight moody on November 9, 2009 at 1:43 PM
Super Jesse 4
I want them to pass a law that does this the other way around. No school, park, library, college, video arcade or any place children might gather can be within 1,000 feet of a bar, hookah lounge, needle exchange, porn shop, or other adult establishment. Sounds crazy right? Where would we put the schools and parks and stuff?

God those rules are so fucking stupid. Somewhere in the world there's probably a kindergarten, sex offender half way house, porno theatre, and a bar all on the same block that disproves this retarded logic.
Posted by Super Jesse http://www.jessevohs.com/ on November 9, 2009 at 1:53 PM
5
And what about parks that have already been taken over by addicts? Is there ever a child within 1,000 feet of that park behind the courthouse?
Posted by keshmeshi on November 9, 2009 at 2:08 PM
Max Solomon 6
@5: if there is, it's not my child. as far as i can tell, EVERY park downtown has been take over by addicts.
Posted by Max Solomon on November 9, 2009 at 2:15 PM
7
The Capitol Hill exchange site is directly across the street from Seattle University and has been since 1992 or 93.

The U District site is across the street from the University of Washington and is in a building that HOUSES a day care facility.

If this actually passes, the consequence is that the ban would still be effectively in place for the vast majority of US syringe exchanges. The exchanges in NYC would have to relocate to the middle of the East or Harlem Rivers in order to use federal funds.
Posted by gnossos on November 9, 2009 at 2:30 PM
Doctor Memory 8
Actually, if we want to permanently solve the problem of heroin addiction, we should require that needle exchanges be held in elementary school playgrounds. Trust me, nothing is as effective an inoculation against the supposed glamour of heroin use as meeting some actual junkies at a formative age.
Posted by Doctor Memory http://blahg.blank.org on November 9, 2009 at 2:37 PM
9
@ doctor memory, i was thinking the same thing!
also, last year, didn't some kids at a local elementary school find a used hypodermic needle and stab each other with it while they were playing doctor?
if there was a close needle exchange...
Posted by darlingash on November 9, 2009 at 2:52 PM
Will in Seattle 10
Obviously we need to put needle exchanges in rural areas and near industrial parks.

... thinking this is going to be fun as the druggies won't travel into Seattle from the burbs anymore.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on November 9, 2009 at 2:52 PM
11
@ 8&9 - My thoughts exactly. Yeah, seeing crusty, nasty druggies lined up for a needle exchange is an unpleasant sight. If little kids see it, it's gonna do more to turn them away from hard drugs than the whole 80's worth of Nancy's "Just Say No" fluff.

Seriously, since when do conservatives have problems with aversion methods using discomfort and fear? It's like their bread and butter. "Don't have sex or you'll be a slut and have to have the baby because you can't get an abortion!" "Don't be gay 'cuz then you'll get AIDS and die!" "Follow Jayzus or you'll spend an eternity burning in hell!"
Posted by xian on November 9, 2009 at 3:06 PM
Fnarf 12
I agree on the deterrent factor, but for most people, even in Seattle, the best place for a needle exchange is always going to be "in some other city".
Posted by Fnarf http://www.facebook.com/fnarf on November 9, 2009 at 3:10 PM
13
while many SEP clients are 'crusty', some drive nice cars and
wear nicer clothes than i do. some have on a work uniform and work at any car shop, restaurant that
folks might frequent. there are many, many functional addicts that
are living just like everyone else, they just need heroin to survive the day. their brain is re-wired to believe they need it. not booze, cigarettes, pot or coffee; they
got hooked on something, for a gazillion complicated reasons, a little more harmful to themselves and the general population. i have volunteered at a syringe exchange for many years and when my daughter turned about 8 or 9 i explained what i was doing. we have great conversations about drugs and above anything she is seeing compassion in my efforts. i don't want her to be afraid of her fellow humans.
Posted by olygirl on November 10, 2009 at 7:42 AM
14
Now you know how the sex offender residency and work place restrictions are affecting those on the registry, even though a huge percentage of those on the registry are convicted of crimes having nothing to do with children. And guess what state is notorious for the most draconian restrictions of sex offenders.....Georgia! Funny how these self proclaimed moralist, red neck, hillbilly, stump broke, un-forgiving, right wing star bats can spread their unrepentant morality throughout the country to make everyone suffer, and hide behind the "Christian" banner.

Fear and loathing in the USA; Sex Offender laws, Drug laws, Sexual Orientation laws, the toxic mix of hysteria, ignorance and Old Testament religious fundamentalism. This nation is quickly abandoning nobility and embracing retribution, exchanging freedom for a tenuous and false sense of security. All being lead blindly by politicians pandering to the hysterical and uninformed through the sensationalist media just to get elected? Intriguing, especially since Jesus said: “But I tell you that it will be more bearable for Sodom on the Day of Judgment than for you.”
Posted by VDog on November 10, 2009 at 10:43 AM

Add a comment

 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use