Slog

News & Arts

Line Out

Music & Nightlife

Wednesday, November 4, 2009

What He Said 3

Posted by Dan Savage on Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 12:44 PM

David Mixner:

President Obama standing on the sidelines in Maine and Washington was appalling. The failure of our national organizations and leaders to demand his involvement was equally appalling. The outrageous act of the Democratic National Committee sending an email into Maine asking Maine Democrats to call into "NEW JERSEY" instead of to support the fight against bigotry was unbelievable. No one gets to sit on the sidelines in an epic battle against apartheid and no one gets a free pass. If you want our support, you have to earn it. We are way beyond where we will accept a little bit in 2009, some in 2010 and maybe more in the second term. Does anyone think after yesterday election results and the upcoming 2010 election, Obama has the ability to repeal "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" and "DOMA" next year? Does anyone really believe we haven't already missed a historic opportunity in the first 10 months of this year? Only a courageous fighting President and Congress can now help turn us this around and that we have not seen so far. Enough.

Share via

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Newsvine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Email
 

Comments (28) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
There is a fine line between bi-partisan and spineless. They've obviously shown us they're the latter.
Posted by UNPAID COMMENTER on November 4, 2009 at 12:52 PM
2
Apartheid? Really?
Posted by lotosesser on November 4, 2009 at 12:54 PM
3
Mixner also blamed the result on "non-white" voters.

Maine is something like 97% white.

I don't disagree that the DNC should have taken a bigger role, but frankly, Obama's efforts in VA and NJ seem to have inspired more of the teabagger vote to come out than the the cool lefty progressive vote, and I don't see any evidence that further involvement from him personally would have helped in maine--his popularity isn't necessarily transferable.

Nate Silver essentially concurs. http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2009/11/w…
Posted by Kevin Erickson on November 4, 2009 at 12:58 PM
4
Obama's presence did a whole lot of nothing in the VA governor's race.
I completely understand LGBT frustration with the Obama administration, it's justified, but I don't see any clear evidence that his involvement would have helped in Maine. Unless you're just looking for a symbolic gesture?
Posted by youllwinintheend on November 4, 2009 at 1:00 PM
Will in Seattle 5
Kevin's right.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on November 4, 2009 at 1:00 PM
6
Does anyone really believe that the missed opportunity isn't intentional?
Posted by CHROMY on November 4, 2009 at 1:01 PM
7
nothing like a good bitch slapping at the ballot box to get all the hysterical pissy queers screaming...
Posted by Caterwailing on November 4, 2009 at 1:01 PM
J-Haxx 8
These were State issues guys. Obama also can't ditch DOMA, Congress has to. Now from what I understand he can flush "Don't Ask Don't Tell," so if you want to bust his chops over something lets work on that.
Posted by J-Haxx http://defyaugury.livejournal.com on November 4, 2009 at 1:02 PM
Confluence 9
Obama pulled a step-back-wait-and-see move. It's like he quietly checked the pulse of the nation with Maine, to see if he has the political capital TO do something big on gay rights. Problem is, he now realizes he doesn't have the support of the majority of Americans. So he's gonna be veeeeeeery careful, even *more* careful now with his next move. He's gotta pick his battles very, very judiciously to keep his credibility with the majority of Americans.
Posted by Confluence on November 4, 2009 at 1:03 PM
10
you outspent the other side 2-1 in Maine and still lost.
And blame Obama?
The lesson Obama will take away is that public support for Gay Marriage is NOT there.
He will (not) act accordingly.

The "Missed Historic Opportunity" was for the Gays to win a state and show Obama that support DOES exist.

see how that works?
Posted by Cold Hard Facts of Life on November 4, 2009 at 1:05 PM
11
10 ps

Do you really think Obama gives a shit about queer outrage and disapproval and disappointment by now?
After 10 months of constant bitching he is numb to that noise...
Posted by Wilma on November 4, 2009 at 1:07 PM
12
The DNC doesn't give a flying fuck. Since I donated to them last year (gobama), I got a survey from them last week asking me to rate issues on importance. Of 16 listed, LGBT rights was not listed. Education, race relations, fucking North Korea - but no gay rights. They don't care.
Posted by kersy on November 4, 2009 at 1:09 PM
13
I haven't heard anything from Mixner in awhile. Good guy, good point. He was a friend of Clinton's, so he knows how we got DOMA and Don't Ask Don't Tell.
Posted by Gary Zinter on November 4, 2009 at 1:13 PM
Cato the Younger Younger 14
I've said it before on Slog and will say it again. I will NEVER vote for a Democrat on the national level again. Those votes of mine will go to the Green Party at this point.

God help you if Washington becomes a swing state.
Posted by Cato the Younger Younger on November 4, 2009 at 1:14 PM
15
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cg…

Coming, January 2010.
This will be pretty interesting, and, hopefully, put an end to all this religious referendum bullshit once and for all.
Posted by chic65 on November 4, 2009 at 1:15 PM
Max Solomon 16
the president has to lead, not bleed. gay marriage needs to marinate a few more years so otherwise rational old straight people get used to the idea - like 2014. that's the calculation in the white house i bet.

Posted by Max Solomon on November 4, 2009 at 1:16 PM
17
14: Have fun remaining powerless then dumbass.
Posted by Lobsterboy on November 4, 2009 at 1:48 PM
18
In ten years, gays will have the right to marry in all 50 states of the USA (or all that don't secede to found their own third world white trash nation). In the meantime, certainly hold Obama's feet to the fire, etc... but low information Americablog-esque hysteria doesn't help.
Posted by Judith on November 4, 2009 at 1:52 PM
schmacky 19
Kevin @3 FTW...everything else that's been said here is comparitively superfluous.
Posted by schmacky on November 4, 2009 at 1:59 PM
Will in Seattle 20
@8 has a good point, but I agree with schmacky on the win.

You want a win? concentrate on DADT and have him order the armed forces top brass to implement it in 72 hours.

Or resign.

It's one of the powers of the Commander in Chief - they serve at his pleasure, not the other way around. The only correct response to an order like that is "Sir! Yes Sir!"
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on November 4, 2009 at 2:38 PM
21
Obama has the inverse of the Midas touch right now -- book your tickets to the Chicago Olympics if you don't believe me.
Posted by Deeds Corzine on November 4, 2009 at 2:51 PM
22
Reality check: Obama is not going to rescue gay rights. Gay rights activists have to do that, by bending public opinion.

What you did by voting for Obama is ensure that the federal government wouldn't actively *oppose* your efforts, which is what would have happened if McCain had won.
Posted by Orv on November 4, 2009 at 3:25 PM
23
3.

Mixner also blamed the result on "non-white" voters.


Can you please show where he said this? I don't see it stated anywhere in the article.
Posted by jade on November 4, 2009 at 3:45 PM
Fenrox 24
So Obama might end up being more of a Franklin Pierce and less of an Abraham Lincon, or if you will a Dwight Eisenhower instead of a John Kennedy. It happens. I mean Pierce could have abolished slavery, Eisenhower could have created the Voting Rights Act, BUT THEY DIDN'T, on to the next Prez.
Posted by Fenrox on November 4, 2009 at 3:47 PM
Fenrox 25
True dat Orv!
Posted by Fenrox on November 4, 2009 at 3:48 PM
Mike in MO 26
ok, here's my question: If we all do as Mixner says, who do we back? 14's suggestion? Create a microscopic 4th party? I'm sorry, but this is our system. Do we want to weaken the Democratic Party?

Sorry I don't have anything constructive to say, but these calls for dumping the Dems is understandable but misguided.

fuck
Posted by Mike in MO on November 4, 2009 at 4:33 PM
Mike in MO 27
these calls ARE understandable but misguided. ugh
Posted by Mike in MO on November 4, 2009 at 4:35 PM
Posted by Kevin Erickson on November 4, 2009 at 7:21 PM

Add a comment

 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use