Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Monday, November 2, 2009

The Senators

Posted by on Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 8:40 AM

The good senator:

the final days of the competition for the second line, which ended with Wednesday's announcement that Boeing had picked Charleston, S.C., convinced [Sen. Patty Murray] that Boeing hadn't seriously pursued Everett as an option, said her spokeswoman, Alex Glass.

As a result, Murray — a Democratic member of the Senate's defense-appropriations subcommittee and longtime champion of Boeing's causes in Congress — will narrow her support of the company.

While this year, for example, she lobbied hard for Senate votes to get extra funding for California-built C-17s, in the future she'll do that only when it benefits Washington state workers, Glass said.

The very bad senator:

"I think that a lot of people may think that the public option is free," said Lieberman, one of the Senate's big spenders, in a suddenly frugal mood. "It's not. It's going to cost the taxpayers and people that have health insurance now, and if it doesn't, it's going to add terribly to our national debt."

This from a senator who, as much as anyone, helped run up the national debt since 9/11 by pushing to raise the military budget to its highest level since World War II. It is a budget inflated by enormous expenditures on high-tech weaponry irrelevant to combating terror, such as the $2-billion-a-piece submarines—produced in his home state of Connecticut—that he claimed were needed to combat Al Qaeda, a landlocked enemy holed up in caves. The same week that he and others in Congress passed a $680-billion defense bill larded with pork of the sort he has always supported, Lieberman is worried about the impact of a very limited public option on the debt.

Really, Lieberman is a lost cause. He is only going to get worse. The older he grows, the nastier he becomes.

 

Comments (3) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
"good senator"

"This year she lobbied hard for Senate votes to get extra funding for California-built C-17s.
In the future she'll do that only when it benefits Washington state workers, Glass said."

Is the C-17 bad for America and was Murray supporting it because she is a Boeing Whore
or
Is the C-17 important for America but she will no longer support it because she is a vindictave Whore?

just exactly what flavor of WHORE is the BITCH?

Posted by answer: She is a Stupid Whore on November 2, 2009 at 9:02 AM
2
Lieberman's not just a lost cause -- he is that, of course, and more. He's getting so convoluted that pretty soon we'll be able to petition to have him put away.
Posted by Calpete on November 2, 2009 at 9:29 AM
elenchos 3
What's "good" about lobbying for weapons only when it benefits workers in one state? Doesn't it matter whether we need the weapons or not? Wouldn't it be cheaper to only build the weapons we need and use the rest of the money for something else? You could just not build the unnecessary planes and send the workers a check, if nothing else. And if we do need the planes, how could she not support them just because they're not built in Washington?
Posted by elenchos on November 2, 2009 at 9:35 AM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy