Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Tuesday, October 27, 2009

And The Questions, They Were Answered...

Posted by on Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 2:16 PM

Post by news intern Garrett McCulloch

obrien_rosencrantz_small.jpg

Guess what's going on in Electionland. City council candidates Mike O'Brien and Robert Rosencrantz are answering questions: Your questions. Questions like these:

Q: Streetcar lines can be built in a fraction of the time and cost of new light rail stations, and can be directly controlled by the city, unlike Metro or Sound Transit bus service. Will you be a leader in expanding Seattle's streetcar network?

O'Brien: "I like streetcars, as I like all investment in public transportation, because it gives people better alternatives and allows us to deciding our city for people, not just cars...Your point about the city controlling a streetcar line is a good one. ... Seattle's transit needs are underfunded and having some independent transit investment dollars would be a good thing. City control of transit, however, is not limited to streetcar technology." [Shorter O'Brien: Bring 'em on.]

Rosencrantz: "I am a big fan of building out our transit infrastructure, whether or not there are rails in the ground. I did not support the South Lake Union Trolley because I was concerned it would wind up diverting revenues away from other mass transit...As our City becomes denser, our transportation priorities must shift towards alternatives to the car. This will require comprehensive planning between all City departments as well as with County and State agencies. Whether or not a formal regional transportation authority exists elected officials must act as if it does." [Shorter Rosencrantz: Buses, buses, buses, buses.]

Q: What will you do to ensure there will be a high level of sustained funding for pedestrian improvements over the next decade...?

O'Brien: "The city must make sidewalks a real priority - not simply something to talk about at election time. I support maintaining the employee head tax, which provides about $4 million dollars a year that can go toward pedestrian improvements. My opponent supports repealing this tax, so I am not sure what his plan is to fund sidewalks." [Shorter O'Brien: Use our designated tax fund.]

Rosencrantz: One of my top three campaign priorities is returning power to neighborhoods. The example I use of how I would accomplish this is to have decisions regarding installation of parking meters in neighborhood business districts made by the neighborhoods themselves and not by City Hall. If the neighborhood business district takes parking meters, my plan would have the neighborhood keeping some portion of the revenue from those parking meters to allow them to shape their neighborhood identity consistent with their own vision, not something imposed by central planning. [Shorter Rosencrantz: Make NIMBY groups tax drivers.]

They'll be answering for almost another hour, so stop by and watch it unfold.

 

Comments (7) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
1
Fascinating. Does Rosencrantz think that parking revenue earned in ALL neighborhoods--including downtown--should stay in those neighborhoods?

Didn't think so.
Posted by lorax on October 27, 2009 at 2:41 PM
Will in Seattle 2
No, he wants it sent to Eyman so he can build a stately pleasure palace, lorax.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on October 27, 2009 at 3:03 PM
Fnarf 3
I'm getting really weary of hearing about sidewalks. The neighborhoods that lack sidewalks are not magically going to be transformed into walkable pedestrian districts just because you put some concrete down. These neighborhoods are Seattle's most car-dependent, and they will remain so no matter how many sidewalks you build for them. Maybe it would be nice, but it would also be nice if money attached to strings labeled "pedestrian improvements" went instead to projects and places that actually HAVE PEDESTRIANS.
Posted by Fnarf http://www.facebook.com/fnarf on October 27, 2009 at 3:08 PM
4
Shorter what? The questions, they were mostly unanswered. These people are asking to be elected to work for us. In most cases, their responses to our questions involved a lengthy, rambling, statement that is likely to please those on one side of the issue at hand without committing themselves to displeasing the other side. An implication of support for something is nothing but slimeball politics.

Can we please not act like these people have answered our questions until our questions are actually answered?
Posted by Phil M http://twitter.com/pmocek on October 27, 2009 at 3:23 PM
Joe Szilagyi 5
I keep wondering how hard it is for them to write answers ahead of time, and then just copy/paste them like any sane person would do.

Are they or their staff actually sitting down and not writing these out till the event starts?
Posted by Joe Szilagyi http://www.joeszilagyi.com on October 27, 2009 at 3:48 PM
Will in Seattle 6
That's because you HAVE sidewalks, Fnarf.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on October 27, 2009 at 4:42 PM
7
So now if you live in a neighborhood, and if you voice the subversive notion that the people who live there ought to have some share in the decision-making process that would AFFECT that neighborhood, some twerp intern at the Stranger will call you a NIMBY -- the "new urbanist" cult's N-Word.

Because only young, hip, vibrant new urbanist hipsters know jack shit about city neighborhoods. The people who live there and are so unhip as to own cars? To the gulags with 'em.

Fnarf @ 3:

Some of these neighborhoods might have pedestrians if they had sidewalks for people to walk on. DUH!
Posted by ivan on October 28, 2009 at 4:53 AM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy