Via the New York Times:
In a San Francisco courtroom two weeks ago, a prominent lawyer opposed to same-sex marriage made a concession that could mark a turning point in the legal wars over the purpose and meaning of marriage.The lawyer, Charles J. Cooper, has studied the matter deeply, and his erudite briefs are steeped in history. He cannot have been blindsided by the question Judge Vaughn R. Walker asked him: What would be the harm of permitting gay men and lesbians to marry?
“Your honor, my answer is: I don’t know,” Mr. Cooper said. “I don’t know.”
Although it's not at all clear that this is in fact good news for the gay rights movement—as the article says, many people have said this lawsuit is "the wrong claim in the wrong court in the wrong state at the wrong time"—it reminds me of something.
Back in 2004, after the U.S. census counted cohabitating same-sex couples for the first time, I set out to test another part of the argument that collapsed in that San Francisco court room two weeks ago.
The census had found gay couples living in almost every single county in the United States. Which, to extend the conservative argument to its logical conclusion, would mean that those few counties with zero gay couples causing harm to the culture would be... utopias, right?
Wrong. Of course. But The Stranger sent me to gay-couple-free counties in deepest Texas, the panhandle of Oklahoma, and eastern Colorado just to be sure. The story is HERE.
1
4
Comments (6) RSS