I've been asked to put special emphasis on the "visual" qualities of the debate, since Hutchison and Constantine could not be more visually different. She is utterly televisual, which makes me think of David Foster Wallace's essay on television (downloadable here):
How can we be made so willingly to acquiesce for hours daily to the illusion that the people on the TV don't know they're being looked at, to the fantasy that we're transcending privacy and feeding on unself-conscious human activity? There might be lots of reasons why these unrealities are so swallowable, but the big one is that the performers behind the two layers of glass are—varying degrees of Thespian talent aside—absolute geniuses at seeming unwatched. Now, seeming unwatched in front of a TV camera is a genuine art. Take a look at how civilians act when a TV camera is pointed at them: they simply spaz out, or else go all rigor mortis. Even PR people and politicians are, camera-wise, civilians.
But not Hutchison, the former TV anchor. She is not a TV civilian.
Hutchison and Constantine are not quite as televisually different as the classic examples when it comes to political debate: Kennedy and Nixon. But they're divided nonetheless.
And yet during the last debate, Hutchison was the one to break a sweat. Will she do it again??
We shall see how they perform. (We already know who to vote for: "Only you can help prevent another Sarah Palin." And just as another reminder: YES on 71, NO on 1033.)
1
2
4
8
13
Comments (13) RSS