Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Thursday, October 15, 2009

Stupid Fucking Credulous Hack of the Day: The Whole Seattle Times

Posted by on Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 10:19 AM

Picture_2.png

The marketing department at the Seattle Art Museum must be psyched: The Seattle Times just picked up SAM's Michelangelo publicity strategy and played it back as the splashy feature on the front page!

The unbylined caption/"story" beneath the headline and photo reads, "[A]s a fun twist on the Seattle exhibit, SAM is placing a dozen 18-inch-tall copies of 'Little David' and his cart around the area. The museum is encouraging people who find them to take pictures of themselves with the cart and sculpture around town..."

Front-page culture news!

 

Comments (29) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
Steven Bradford 1
This known as a placement. It's hardly worthy of commenting on, other than, yep, this is how it works. Always has.
Posted by Steven Bradford http://www.seanet.com/~bradford/ on October 15, 2009 at 10:26 AM
boxofbirds 2
Ugh, I'm surprised they didn't have local artists and business decorate the little david's and place them around town and auction them off at the end for charity.
Posted by boxofbirds on October 15, 2009 at 10:31 AM
Baconcat 3
And now you're promoting the ad! YAAAAAAAAAAAY!
Posted by Baconcat on October 15, 2009 at 10:38 AM
4
At least it's not fiberglass pigs or horses blocking up the sidewalks.
Posted by Westside forever on October 15, 2009 at 10:38 AM
5
Always has? Steven Bradford, the contemporary daily newspaper attitude toward culture (particularly its treatment of culture as a sidecar to celebrity/gossip coverage and approached in much the same way), is hardly an incontrovertible natural fact. It's something that has developed in the last 20 years alongside various forces, including...the demise of the contemporary daily newspaper.
Posted by Jen Graves on October 15, 2009 at 10:39 AM
baconpussy 6
@3: You are coming perilously close to criticism...
Posted by baconpussy on October 15, 2009 at 10:39 AM
7
Baconcat, now you're promoting my promoting!
Posted by Jen Graves on October 15, 2009 at 10:39 AM
CripKev 8
Meh ...

And speaking of marketing, isn't the Stranger at risk of diminishing the Stupid Fucking Credulous Hack® Brand by applying it here ??
Posted by CripKev on October 15, 2009 at 10:42 AM
Steven Bradford 9
Publicity is publicity. That's how its worked for the smart museums (and the smart institutions and companies) for much more than 20 years. Publicists and reporters and editors work together to get the word out. Often the story and pictures are pretty much handed to them on a silver platter, wrapped in a bow, by the smart publicists.

Yawn

I've only been reading newspapers for 45 years, so I don't know, maybe you're right.
Posted by Steven Bradford http://www.seanet.com/~bradford/ on October 15, 2009 at 10:44 AM
10
I may be biased as I work for the Times (not in the newsroom), but... "stupid fucking credulous hack" seems like it should at least be reserved for circumstances in which a reporter or media outlet makes a choice that is directly against the public's interest or masks the "real story" they should be trying to tell. It's really going to be used for THIS? A local newspaper advancing a local museum's marketing plan?

Posted by Cake on October 15, 2009 at 10:49 AM
pissy mcslogbot 11
"The museum is encouraging people who find them to take pictures of themselves with the cart and sculpture around town..."

gee, that sounds like one of them wacky fun flesh mob intrenety things the kids are doing.

Jinkies, a clue!!! Velma.
Posted by pissy mcslogbot on October 15, 2009 at 10:49 AM
Rhett Oracle 12
And if the Stranger gets involved in this "little David" promo, one may be certain that a feature on "comparative penises" won't be far behind. Or is SAM going to Vaticanize the statuettes ŕ la the sexless Oscars?
Posted by Rhett Oracle on October 15, 2009 at 10:50 AM
13
@8,

That presumes it had any value in the first place.
Posted by keshmeshi on October 15, 2009 at 10:56 AM
very bad homo 14
Why do you hate art?
Posted by very bad homo on October 15, 2009 at 10:56 AM
Heather 15
Speaking of stupid fucking assholes:

http://www.nbcnewyork.com/blogs/the-thre…
Posted by Heather on October 15, 2009 at 11:13 AM
Will in Seattle 16
How come they never put them in Fremont or Ballard - we're in Seattle too, SAM.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on October 15, 2009 at 11:17 AM
17
Not to point out the obvious here but any encouragement in promoting visual arts shouldn't be criticized. This exhibit of Michelangelo makes his work accessible to young people. And it's not as if every person in Seattle has the financial means to see the real David in Florence, Italy.

If you want to criticize someone, go after the local gallery owners that are too afraid to present work that isn't saleable. Hell, I've seen better shows in St. Petersburg, Florida.
Posted by James E on October 15, 2009 at 11:39 AM
NumberOne 18
@ 10 & 17, I agree with both of your points. There seems to obviously be other agendas at work here.
Posted by NumberOne on October 15, 2009 at 11:44 AM
19
stfu and gbtw
Posted by jns on October 15, 2009 at 12:11 PM
20
I don't get the bitterness about this. What is your point, Jen?
Posted by Get Real on October 15, 2009 at 12:14 PM
Fifty-Two-Eighty 21
Hmm. The only "stupid fucking credulous hack" I see around here is Jen. But then, that's nothing out of the ordinary.
Posted by Fifty-Two-Eighty http://www.nra.org on October 15, 2009 at 12:27 PM
Rotten666 22
Yeah, what a bunch of assholes for pointing out the exhibit at Seattle's premier cultural venue. And having a little fun with it. Why can't even be cool and serious like the gang at the stranger?
Posted by Rotten666 on October 15, 2009 at 12:29 PM
23
So Seattle's premiere museum is promoting a big new exhibit, and the daily newspaper runs a picture and mini-story about it on the front page.

Yes, that is positively shocking and absolutely the lowest form of journalism.

Weak stuff, Jen.
Posted by bigyaz on October 15, 2009 at 1:01 PM
24
You're right: a promotion of a promotion is good work.
Posted by Jen Graves on October 15, 2009 at 1:13 PM
25
What's the problem, Jen? It seems like a nice mention for the museum, an interesting activity for readers, and a pretty picture for the front page. For 50 cents, that isn't a bad value from a minor daily paper.
Posted by Limey Rick on October 15, 2009 at 1:47 PM
26
No one said it's Pulitzer stuff, Jen. It's just letting people know about something going on in the city. Jesus.
Posted by bigyaz on October 15, 2009 at 1:55 PM
27
God forbid the Seattle Times employ a writer who promotes himself endlessly (Savage), other writers who wet their pants about appearing on KUOW (Sanders) or promote their own porno show (Hump).

what hypocrites.
Posted by Journalism police on October 15, 2009 at 6:39 PM
emor 28
All I know is that it's spectacularly stupid for the Times to run this as their most important story of the day, considering they are the primary newspaper serving several million people. Of course, I think that about five times a week.
Posted by emor on October 15, 2009 at 10:13 PM
29
Doesn't anyone remember the Leonardo da Vinci show that the Henry Gallery put on years ago under the salesmanship of its head salesman Harvey West? It was based on a single painting (unconvincingly) deemed to be a Leonardo in breathless prose by a U of W art history faculty member, Joanne Snow Smith. The show was greatly enlarged by all sorts of related minor material.

That was the low ebb of museum hucksterism.

These, at least, are actually by Michelangelo.
Posted by Memorykeeper on October 26, 2009 at 11:54 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy