Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Wednesday, October 14, 2009

Mallahan and McGinn: the Culture Plans

Posted by on Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 4:21 PM

When the mayor's race began, neither candidate had an arts platform. The city was forced to speculate about what Joe Mallahan and Mike McGinn were thinking. How would they deal with music clubs and noise complaints? Would they give the city's arts offices more muscle? Did they understand that bolstering a city's culture attracts thinkers and businesses, makes money, and improves life overall?

"No, they didn't," says David Brown, executive director of Pacific Northwest Ballet (which just won a Stranger Genius Award). "Culture was conspicuously absent from the early conversations." So the culture constituency began making noise, publicly and privately, arguing that it mattered and could leverage money and votes (like the city's 21,000 professional arts workers). They asked that cultural stewardship get a seat at the table.

The candidates responded: McGinn released a five-point culture platform in late September, and Mallahan released his four-point plan last week. "Eventually," Brown says, "they told us what we wanted to hear."

2095469768_0b47258134.jpg
  • joiseyshowaa on Flickr

The Mallahan plan: 1. Support the city's Office of Arts & Cultural Affairs (OACA) and the Office of Film + Music (refuting a wave of negative press after Mallahan—allegedly—suggested cutting OACA). 2. Deal with the noise wars between residential developers and the preexisting nightclubs they're building around. 3. Replace the viaduct with a traffic tunnel to, uh, prevent traffic jams (an irrelevant potshot at McGinn's transportation platform). 4. Involve artists in designing infrastructure projects; push for incentives and zoning amendments so developers will preserve/build arts spaces along with their condos.

The McGinn plan: 1. Protect the OACA budget and lift it when the economy permits. 2. Increase arts investment from the city, including targeted capital infusions. 3. Designate cultural districts and push incentives for developers to preserve/build arts spaces. (More specifically, support recommendations from the Cultural Overlay District Advisory Committee, or CODAC, a group of arts and housing folks from Liz Dunn to Michael Seiwerath to Pat Graney—people worth listening to.) 4. Include arts and music education in Families and Education Levy proposals. 5. Do more research. That sounds boring, but we don't fully understand how arts funding improves the city's life and economy. The more we know, the better the policy.

Their platforms are similar, but McGinn's is more grounded and specific, and it shows familiarity with the work the culture constituency has already done. And it doesn't mention the tunnel, though Mallahan is now adopting that albatross as his own.

(Another viaduct proposal: If and when it goes, keep a portion for open-air concerts—sitting up top at sunset would be fantastic.)

The fact that the candidates launched these platforms at all shows they're paying attention. That alone is a small victory.

 

Comments (13) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
Baconcat 1
If and when it goes


Gregoire said 2012. Oops, I mean 2016. Oops, that's the closing, she means 2018. Oops, that's when other work can begin.

Expect an open waterfront between 2020 and 2024, barring delays.
Posted by Baconcat on October 14, 2009 at 4:23 PM
COMTE 2
So, here's something I haven't heard addressed vis-a-vis the tunnel proposal:

I headed down Aurora this afternoon to drop off some bulk mail at the Post Office receiving facility at the south end of Boeing Field. When I got to about Valley St. Aurora came to a complete standstill. Southbound traffic crept at a pace so slow my speedometer barely registered. 35 minutes later I finally came to the source of the backup: a single stalled vehicle in the far right-hand lane, just north of the 1st Ave S. exit, "protected" by two SPD units. This one vehicle, not even blocking one full lane of traffic, completely monkey-wrenched the transit of hundreds, if not a thousand or more vehicles over the viaduct.

What, pray-tell, do the wise and all-knowing ones pushing for a tunnel think will happen whenever a car gets stuck half-way down a hollow tube with no means of extracting the vehicle, because the thing is clogged with cars, making it impossible for a tow-truck to get to it, which, by any reasonable estimate is liable to happen on average of once a week or so? And that's not even a worst-case scenario; what if it's a real accident? With injuries? Taking up all the lanes?

If this thing had emergency access, or a couple of on/off ramps that could be shut down or traffic redirected, then I suppose this wouldn't be so much of an issue, but with no way to get into or out of it except at either end, this sort of situation is likely to occur with annoying frequency.

And once you're stuck inside, there won't be a damned thing you'll be able to do until the obstruction is eventually unclogged and traffic is able to move freely again.

Just something to think about...
Posted by COMTE http://www.chriscomte.com on October 14, 2009 at 4:55 PM
3
So the culture constituency began making noise


I just wanted to point out, because Brendan is too much of a gentleman to do it himself, that the culture constituency started making noise in large part because Brendan used Slog and his column to prod them to do so, and the public nature of that prodding forced the candidates to respond.

So thank you, Brendan. Way to use your powers for good.
Posted by Holly Arsenault on October 14, 2009 at 4:59 PM
CBSeattle 4
You could put them both on the spot by asking them questions in Electionland. I've had a good time on that thing and actually know who the candidates for city council are this year. Sure you get some boilerplate answers, but you can really tell a lot about their positions/personality by reading their answers. Even the differences between people who on the face of it seem like they have the same values. Interesting. (http://electionland.thestranger.com).
Posted by CBSeattle http://www.yousaidit.com on October 14, 2009 at 5:17 PM
Will in Seattle 5
Just think, once the Billionaires Tunnel is built, people in Ballard, West Seattle, and Magnolia will have no way to get downtown in under an hour.

Not to mention the reduction in freight capacity to 40 percent of what it would be with a rebuilt viaduct option or 50 percent of what it would be with a surface plus transit option.

Let alone the non-existence of transit and HOV lanes in the Billionaires Tunnel, or the 24/7/365 power usage for fans and lighting that will require us to build another coal-burning power plant (we have two here and they show up in US News & World Report as medium pollution risks).
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on October 14, 2009 at 5:18 PM
Will in Seattle 6
But I'm sure Mallahan will convince Bill Gates and Paul Allen to put up some nice art at the entrance to the Billionaires Tunnel - heck, maybe they'll export those jobs to some nice artist overseas ...
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on October 14, 2009 at 5:19 PM
7
COMTE, I'm happy to keep this primarily a culture discussion, but to your point - the reason there will be fewer overall lanes in the tunnel than are currently present on the viaduct is for wider shoulders to remove stalled/crashed vehicles and keep traffic moving.

as an avid show-goer, I'm happy both candidates have recognized (even if by pressure) the importance of the arts scene in this city. I appreciate McGinn's specific mentions of targeted capital & money in the levies, though I'd love to hear more about how 'cultural districts' are supposed to work. I really like Mallahan mentioning that the incessant back-and-forth between existing nightclubs and residential developers (and subsequent overuse of noise complaint filings by residents) needs to be fixed.
Posted by serotonein on October 14, 2009 at 5:22 PM
gloomy gus 8
That's a good point, Holly @3. Brendan made the case really well that the "culture constituency" needed to start goading these unworldly boneheads into competing for culture-lovers' votes.

It makes the race more well-rounded, not all just pet issues and efficiency-drivin'. Forcing them to cobble together platforms, however vague, also betters the odds that cultural interests can stay players once somebody's in office, if they commit enough scarce resources to continued lobbying.
Posted by gloomy gus on October 14, 2009 at 5:48 PM
9
Not to diminish Brendan's contribution but the Arts Leadership Lab, CODA Panel, and WSAA (Washington State Arts Alliance) have been working to influence policy for just under 2 years for ALL and CODA, and for over 30 years for the WSAA. Of course I am not complaining that Brendan has been making a push on SLOG and in his columns for the arts and culture to be addressed by city council.
Posted by andre on October 14, 2009 at 6:29 PM
COMTE 10
@7, while I appreciate your effort to stay on-tpic, I still have to ask: ever put a kink in a garden hose? The water doesn't leave a convenient gap around the inside circumference to ease the flow. Expecting several hundred vehicles stuck underground to adhere to the notion of keeping emergency lanes open', even under threat of citation, is woefully naive; those lanes are going to get used and clogged up about as fast as you can say, "OMFG! I,M STCK IN A HOLE IN THE FUCKING GROUND AND THERE'S ONLY ONE WAY OUT!"

Posted by COMTE http://www.chriscomte.com on October 14, 2009 at 6:36 PM
11
Brendan:

You give Mallahan's arts platform too much credit. It's a vague statement of principles, and it's inherently unaccountable. "Hey, you cut the budget! You said you would support it!" "I did, I could have cut it worse."

McGinn's platform is just plainly better.
Posted by TValley on October 15, 2009 at 9:36 AM
Reality Check 12
yeah I mean thanks! We have sooooo much $$$ in the upcoming budget to spend on the Arts and Culture! You never hear in this time of overflowing cash in the coffers about the need to slash budgets in those silly optional departments like the Sheriff's office, Road Dept, or transit! I mean really... when was the last time you heard of King County and Seattle needing to ask their staff to go on work furloughs?

We have tons of cash to go waste ! Yaayyyyy! Seattle is rich!

Nor is there any measures on the ballot to ask for more funding from the wealthier property owners either is there? Right?

I don't think I missed anything?

Who else has great ideas on how to spend all this excess $$$$

Anyone else have good ideas during these awesome economic times???
Posted by Reality Check http://www.nraila.org on October 15, 2009 at 1:15 PM
d rock 13
that photo is totally on jessie israel's website.
Posted by d rock http://www.13th-Grade.COM on October 15, 2009 at 1:38 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy