"I know that the whole Bryan Denson pot article is really old news by now," writes Slog tipper Bill, "but thought I would drop a line to say that NPR/KPLU had a story this morning on the exact same topic that was more properly done. If you read the web version it says it’s the 'full' article. It’s not. You have to actually listen to the audio to hear Dale Rogers interview two people on the pro-pot side. Since I don’t read Bryan Denson, I won’t waste my time sending it to him to say: 'See, this is how it’s done.' Much more fun to send it to you to say thank you for calling a crap story a crap story."
"What's the opposite of a Stupid Fucking Credulous Hack?" asks Slog tipper Andrew. "Because Tom Banse's report on public land marijuana farms does what you are always, ah, encouraging reporters to do: checks in with the other side, questions the utility of the whole prohibition thing. Here's the link. They teased it on the radio by framing the whole report as "Do these raids even work?"
I'm riding light rail to the airport right now and can't listen to Banse's story. But Sloggers are invited to listen. And if Tom Banse got it right—if he was fair, if he was balanced, if he wasn't phoning in yet another drug-war-propaganda story dressed up in the drag of journalism—you can show Tom some love and shower him with praise by emailing him here (and CC me).
For the record: Back in June Banse's colleague Anna King was named Stupid Fucking Credulous Hack of the Day for her "reporting" on a grow-op bust. That SFCH lead famously lead to this dustup and, of course, the usual handwringing from the sensitivos who think I'm too mean. But as Dom and I pointed out when we launched SFCH, we tried nice. We tried polite. We tried reason. None of it worked. Nice didn't seem to get the attention of any of the reporters covering grow-op busts. SFCH on other hand...
11
12
Comments (13) RSS