Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Tuesday, October 13, 2009

Into the Bladeless Future

Posted by on Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 11:12 AM

6a6d92ea-b74a-11de-9812-00144feab49a-1.jpg

Available for sale in the US and Australia starting today: Dyson's bladeless electric fan.

Take it away, Financial Times:

The Dyson Air Multiplier fan uses advancements in airflow engineering instead of traditional blades to ‘multiply’ air 15 times and push out 119 gallons of smooth and uninterrupted air every second. As a result, Dyson claims the bladeless fan, which works by forcing a jet of air out of a narrow circular slit and then over an aerofoil-shaped blade, is at least as efficient as its bladed counterpart, more comfortable and much safer.....The Dyson Air Multiplier will be available in two sizes, a 10-inch model costing $300 and a 12-inch model costing $330.

Having recently experienced the elegant effectiveness of the Dyson Airblade hand dryer, I look forward to sometime being in the same room with a Dyson Air Multiplier fan. (It MULTIPLIES AIR!)

But if futuristic doo-dads aren't your thing, maybe I can interest you in some auctioned wads of dead celebrity hair?

 

Comments (18) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
FreudianShrimp 1
Any day now Dyson can expect a lawsuit from Oprah claiming trademark infringement.
Posted by FreudianShrimp on October 13, 2009 at 11:18 AM
rob! 2
A lot of kids who heard about blowjobs third-hand in the schoolyard are going to be very disappointed... but un-maimed.
Posted by rob! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QZBdUceCL5U on October 13, 2009 at 11:29 AM
3
It's got a motor. What is the motor turning if not a blade? It seems the blade is just in the base. I could be wrong, but I strongly suspect bullshit.
Posted by charlie2001 on October 13, 2009 at 11:30 AM
Max Solomon 4
at $300 for a house fan, it should double as a vaporizer.
Posted by Max Solomon on October 13, 2009 at 11:31 AM
5
it doesn't say the motor doesn't have blades...
Posted by Postum on October 13, 2009 at 11:37 AM
6
"Dyson claims the bladeless fan, which works by forcing a jet of air out of a narrow circular slit and then over an aerofoil-shaped blade"

I could be mistaken, but I'm pretty sure that an "aerofoil-shaped blade" qualifies as a blade, since it's in the goddamn name.

Bad naming convention aside...sounds cool (no pun intended).
Posted by j.lee on October 13, 2009 at 11:38 AM
7
whoops, motor may have blades, just not the fan assembly.

anyway, Dyson is awesome!
Posted by Postum on October 13, 2009 at 11:38 AM
COMTE 8
Dang, based on the headline I was hoping this had something to do with shaving.

I mean, nowadays we've got triple-tracks (an idea once thought so ludicrous it was the subject of "Saturday Night Live"'s very first commercial parody), quad-tracks, even five-bladed razors, so the idea of someone going completely in the other direction by developing a blade-less razor had me excited for a moment.
Posted by COMTE http://www.chriscomte.com on October 13, 2009 at 11:45 AM
Jessica 9
The airblade hand-dryer is the best reason to go to the Sodo Costco.
Posted by Jessica on October 13, 2009 at 12:05 PM
Jaymz 10
Tried the airblade hand dryer for the first time yesterday at the Convention Center - impressive, but putting my hands down in there caused me to flash on those schlocky horror movies that come out this time of year: Maybe real blades will chop my hands off!
Posted by Jaymz on October 13, 2009 at 12:08 PM
Carollani 11
Dyson is to appliances what Apple is to computers. I freaking LOVE Dyson and I was very intrigued by their intentionally vague emailing telling me that they had a new product they were unveiling. My Dyson vacuum is the best I've ever had, and the Dyson airblade is my favorite kind of hand dryer. I can't wait to actually see this thing in real life!
Posted by Carollani http://twitter.com/carollani on October 13, 2009 at 12:21 PM
mmennonno 12
Dyson should stick with chickens.
Posted by mmennonno http://mennonnosapiens.com on October 13, 2009 at 12:21 PM
Beetlecat 13
@11: including the over-priceyness.... :)
Posted by Beetlecat on October 13, 2009 at 12:29 PM
w7ngman 14
How is that more comfortable? And more safe? Are a significant number of people taking the covers off of their fans?
Posted by w7ngman http://userscripts.org/users/89370 on October 13, 2009 at 12:38 PM
15
what a bunch of haters itt
Posted by Swearengen on October 13, 2009 at 12:53 PM
16
I understand how it works but I still don't know what the fuck they mean by "multiplying" the air.
Posted by The CHZA on October 13, 2009 at 2:22 PM
brian 17
Unless you're already deaf it's going to need to be about 400x quieter than the airblade hand dryers.
Posted by brian on October 13, 2009 at 3:24 PM
The Amazing Jim 18
$300.00 is a bit steep for a fan, but I do love my vacuum!
Posted by The Amazing Jim http://www.facebook.com/home.php?#/profile.php?id=100000076496291&ref=profile on October 13, 2009 at 3:43 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy