Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Monday, October 12, 2009

Gregoire Will Stand Up to Eyman, Except When She Won't

Posted by on Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 12:32 PM

Governor Christine Gregoire comes out swinging against Tim Eyman's latest initiative at recent lefty breakfest meeting:

In a brief, fiery Thursday speech to a crowd of 800 conservationists, Gov. Chris Gregoire declared that the state "won't come out of this recession" if voters pass Initiative 1033 in November.

The Tim Eyman-sponsored initiative, which imposes rigid restrictions on growth of government income, would "devastate the state of Washington," Gregoire told Washington Conservation Voters' "Breakfast of Champions."

"I will not stand by. I will not be silent ... Look at California. They can't function because they have been 'initiatiated' to death," Gregoire said.

It's pretty easy for politicians from all over the state to slam Tim Eyman's initiatives before they are passed. What can be difficult to find is a politician with the backbone to continue fighting these initiatives after they're passed. Initiative 747, which severely restricted property taxes, was ruled unconstitutional in 2007, but it was Gregoire who came to the rescue. A special session of the legislature was called, and it was yet again enshrined into law.

So, it's true, she will "not stand by"—instead she'll work overtime to make sure Eyman's unconstitutional initiatives are rewritten into law. And she will "not be silent"—she'll kick and scream until voters are duped by another one of his for-profit campaigns, and then she'll be silent.

 

Comments (9) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
w7ngman 1
What?
Posted by w7ngman http://userscripts.org/users/89370 on October 12, 2009 at 1:14 PM
Chip 2
You should be less slanted here: I-747 was only declared unconstitutional due to the fact that its impact was misrepresented to voters, not due to the content of the initiative itself. It was thrown out more or less on a technicality; it's petty (and dishonest) to describe using the legislature to pass I-747's cuts as "rewriting" an unconstitutional amendment.
Posted by Chip on October 12, 2009 at 1:22 PM
Max Solomon 3
@2: still, the legislature was under no obligation to make it law.
Posted by Max Solomon on October 12, 2009 at 1:57 PM
Will in Seattle 4
Very true, @3.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on October 12, 2009 at 2:01 PM
Chip 5
@2: Oh, totally. The legislature (and especially Democratic governor) shouldn't have caved to the anti-government interests - but that doesn't call for Fox News style name-calling and fact distortion.
Posted by Chip on October 12, 2009 at 2:09 PM
Chip 6
@3. Really.
Posted by Chip on October 12, 2009 at 2:10 PM
7
Fuck Gregoire. That's why I voted for Rossi. At least he's honest about his positions.
Posted by Max J on October 12, 2009 at 2:19 PM
8
She doesn't care about initiatives when they fuck local governments, but when Timmy starts coming after the state, that's when she gets scared.
Posted by lorax on October 12, 2009 at 2:25 PM
Will in Seattle 9
@7 - lol.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on October 12, 2009 at 2:48 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy