Slog

News & Arts

The Stranger Suggests

Critics' Best Bets
Music Arts & Food


Line Out

Music & the City
at Night

Friday, October 9, 2009

Mayoral Candidates Politicize Search for Police Chief

Posted by on Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 11:05 AM

Standing on the corner 23rd Avenue East and East Union Street in front of the vacant Philly Cheese Steak restaurant—feet from a bullet hole through the aluminum window frame and where the owner was murdered two years ago—mayoral candidate Mike McGinn chastised challenger Joe Mallahan for delaying the search for a new police chief.

"We need to start now," said McGinn. A trend in youth and gun violence makes the search urgent, he said. "Now is not the time to wait."

Mayor Greg Nickels, who has appointed a 24-member search committee, had asked both candidates if he should proceed with the search for a new police chief after losing in the primary election. McGinn recommended that the search continue, but Mallahan asked the mayor's office to postpone the selection of a new police chief, allowing the next mayor to undertake the process when he is elected. Nickels's office deferred to Mallahan.

"I think that's a mistake," McGinn said. Finding and appointing a new chief could take four to six months after a new mayor is elected, and delaying the search prevents a new police chief from starting new anti-crime initiatives, McGinn said. The position has been currently held since by an interim appointee, John Diaz, since former chief Gil Kerlikowske left to serve as Obama's Drug Czar in May. McGinn believes that early portions of the search process would be unaffected under any mayor.

What harm would occur if the search were to proceed during the election? "I don’t know that there would be great harm," says Mallahan spokeswoman Charla Neuman. Mallahan doesn't have any problem with the members already chosen by Nickels, she says, "Joe just wanted the opportunity to add one or two more people if it would add to the quality of the search."

"A search process like this is not a political process--it's a community process," McGinn said. "By choosing to delay it, [Mallahan] is injecting politics into the the search."

But the Mallahan camp argues that it would be a political issue if the search continues.

"Joe did not want this to become a political issue during the campaign for candidates to play games with, just as McGinn is doing today," says Neuman. "McGinn should be ashamed, actually." She adds, "He doesn't have platform of his own, so he is trying to turn public safety into a political issue."

When I asked McGinn what public-safety initiatives would be delayed if we postpone the selection of a chief, he referred to his public safety platform, released in mid-September.

 

Comments (22) RSS

Oldest First Unregistered On Registered On Add a comment
gloomy gus 1
McGinn called a press conference at a photogenic streetcorner to accuse his opponent of politicizing? Awe. some.
Posted by gloomy gus on October 9, 2009 at 11:06 AM
2
McGinn supporters see Central District News - the comments are swinging anti...
Posted by CD nut on October 9, 2009 at 11:08 AM
3
Well, now McGinn knows how to get to 23rd and Union
Posted by 23rd and subtle on October 9, 2009 at 11:11 AM
4
Charla/Mallahan accusing McGinn of not having a platform is so brazenly dishonest and hypocritical it's hard to know where to start. S/he has policies on very little, most of them have closely mirrored policies McGinn has already released, AND s/he changes them at the whim of "the establishment." Most recent example - the Burke-Gilman, which Mallahan opposes. Shameful.
Posted by i'd call it Rovian but Rove is at least smart on October 9, 2009 at 11:12 AM
Will in Seattle 5
Only weaklings wait.

McGinn, once more, has taken the strong, decisive leadership role that our city needs.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on October 9, 2009 at 11:22 AM
Will in Seattle 6
(by the way, he has an office in the SE end, so he passes there when he bikes sometimes)
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on October 9, 2009 at 11:22 AM
7
Will: McGinn's office called and asked you to stop supporting him. It's killing his campaign.
Posted by bigyaz on October 9, 2009 at 11:49 AM
Will in Seattle 8
I love you too, bigyaz. How's that tunnel working out for you?

Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on October 9, 2009 at 11:50 AM
gloomy gus 9
@7 I love you.
Posted by gloomy gus on October 9, 2009 at 11:51 AM
Dominic Holden 10
@ 7) What's your problem now, bigyaz? You troll me every day (man, you've got a lot of free time)--and your points almost always take the form of an ad hominem attack. I get it, you're a big ol' conservative and I'm a big ol' liberal. But here's a post that makes the points raised by both sides. But still, you nag, nag, nag. If you have nothing to say about the content of my writing--but you're just strangely obsessed with my posts--why even comment?
Posted by Dominic Holden on October 9, 2009 at 12:07 PM
gloomy gus 11
Jeez, @10, granted bigyaz is a giant flaming dorkball troll, but at least this thread marks the first time he's aimed his bile only at Will--in a way that made me giggle!--instead of upright citizens like you or Baconcat. Or did I miss something?
Posted by gloomy gus on October 9, 2009 at 12:26 PM
Dominic Holden 12
@ 11) You're right... his bile was aimed at Will, not me. I think I'm just at my wit's end with this troll.
Posted by Dominic Holden on October 9, 2009 at 12:29 PM
seandr 13
"McGinn should be ashamed, actually... he is trying to turn public safety into a political issue."

Public safety IS a political issue in a mayoral election. It's certainly one of issues that will influence my vote.

Some of the quotes these local campaign "spokespersons" make are so vapid, it's embarassing.
Posted by seandr on October 9, 2009 at 12:35 PM
gloomy gus 14
@12, at times like that just remember, most of us commenters are pencil-dicked balding underemployed crabapples with mayonnaise breath and untreated external hemorrhoids.
Posted by gloomy gus on October 9, 2009 at 12:47 PM
15
@10: As pointed out, it was a jab (and not a particularly vicious one) at Will.

Actually, I'm no conservative, much more libertarian. But my standard point (and sorry if it gets repetitious) is that you can write with a point of view without totally misrepresenting the other side of the issue. When you were just writing about legalizing pot it didn't matter. But now they're letting you write about serious stuff like elections, and your amateurishness is all too obvious.

If you feel strongly McGinn is a better candidate, why do you feel the need to belittle and mischaracterize Mallahan? Why not lay the facts out there honestly, state your opinion and let us decide from there?

It's interesting that you get so worked up about right-wing pundits and commentators. You employ many of the same tactics in your crusade.
Posted by bigyaz on October 9, 2009 at 1:01 PM
Reality Check 16
@10 I applaud the fairly written piece. Seriously I do....

And you won't believe this... but I agree with McGinn on this issue. There is no reason to delay finding a new chief. It will take long enough as it is with a 24 person search committee.

It makes no sense, as a Police Chief has to go thru so many hoops/hurdles to get into that position, that neither candidate will have any significant final decision pull on who is ultimately chosen.

McGinn is still politicizing this issue though, and for his campaign to claim otherwise is ridiculous.

We need a new chief from outside the region though. Someone outside of the current SPD officer's guild.

Happy Friday Dom.
Posted by Reality Check http://www.nraila.org on October 9, 2009 at 1:19 PM
17
does DOJ look for a new law enforcement officer before the election of a new pres?

no

starting this process only to get a Chief that is not aligned with the new mayor is a waste of time.
Posted by dacoach on October 9, 2009 at 1:39 PM
18
I'm beginning to think we're royally fucked in this city with this election. Maybe we should beg Ed Murray to run, or physically remove Steinbrueck from Harvard and force him to become mayor?
Posted by paulwashere on October 9, 2009 at 1:54 PM
19
I'm beginning to think we're royally fucked in this city with this election. Maybe we should beg Ed Murray to run, or physically remove Steinbrueck from Harvard and force him to become mayor?
Posted by paulwashere on October 9, 2009 at 1:54 PM
Will in Seattle 20
I would like to publicly announce that I stand behind Baconcat and all other proud San Antonians.

That said, people who want Greg to win need to seriously realize we kicked him out for a reason - actually, a lot of them.
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on October 9, 2009 at 2:38 PM
Will in Seattle 21
besides Peter Steinbreuck is busy being an investigative journalist right now ...
Posted by Will in Seattle http://www.facebook.com/WillSeattle on October 9, 2009 at 2:39 PM
ralph 22
I'll vote for McGinn if he makes my dad police chief.
Posted by ralph on October 9, 2009 at 4:48 PM

Add a comment

Advertisement
 

All contents © Index Newspapers, LLC
1535 11th Ave (Third Floor), Seattle, WA 98122
Contact Info | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Takedown Policy